An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Palau ‘Honored’ To Take Chinese Detainees

I can’t wait to hear the reaction of Republicans that the remote Pacific island nation of Palau is “honored and proud” to resettle about 17 Chinese Muslims now held as “non-combatants” at the Guantanamo Bay prison.

“Palau’s accommodation to accept the temporary resettlement of these detainees is a humanitarian gesture intended to help them be freed of any further unnecessary incarceration and to restart their lives in as normal a fashion as possible,” President Johnson Toribiong said.

Toribiong’s unilateral announcement came a day after U.S. marshals flew another Guantanamo detainee to New York City where he appeared in federal court and pleaded not guilty to 286 murder and conspiracy charges in the bombings of U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya.

Republicans claim the American people do not want trials and incarcerations of alleged terrorists in the United States for fear they will either escape, the trials will reveal classified information threatening our national security or released on the streets if found innocent of the charges.

Actually, the pending release of the 17 Chinese and trial of Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, a Tanzanian held at Guantanamo since 2006, are the easiest decisions by the Obama administration on what to do with the remaining 218 prisoners at Guantanamo. Obama has pledged to close the prison by January 2010 but has failed to determine how to adjudicate the most dangerous. Until such a plan is forthcoming, Congressional Democrats have joined with Republicans to withhold funding for the base closure.

A federal judge last year ordered the Uighur Chinese detainees released into the United States after the Pentagon determined they were not “enemy combatants.” But an appeals court halted the order, and they have been in legal limbo ever since.

Anonymous government sources said Palau will be compensated with $200 million and its treaty with the U.S. for self-defense will be renegotiated later this year. Palau, made up of eight main islands plus more than 250 islets with an estimated 20,000 population, is best known for diving and tourism and is located some 500 miles east of the Philippines in the Pacific Ocean.

The government refused to send the Uighur detainees to China for fear they would be tortured or killed because of the group’s uprising in western Chinese provinces.

Meanwhile, Ghailani was a strategic choice for the Obama administration to demonstrate that the federal courts — as opposed to the Guantanamo military tribunals — can be relied on to bring to justice those suspected of heinous acts against the United States.

“The Justice Department has a long history of securely detaining and successfully prosecuting terror suspects through the criminal justice system, and we will bring that experience to bear in seeking justice in this case,” Atty. Gen. Eric Holder said.

U.S. prisons now hold 216 terrorism suspects or convicts, including Omar Abdel Rahman, serving a life sentence for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and Zacarias Moussaoui, convicted of plotting with the Sept. 11 hijackers.

Human rights groups that have been sharply critical of U.S. detention policy at Guantanamo praised the transfer of Ghailani. “This is an important step in restoring the United States’ observance of the rule of law, but there is still a long way to go,” said Virginia Sloan, president of the Constitution Project, an alliance of rights advocates.

House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said in a statement: “This is the first step in the Democrats’ plan to import terrorists into America.”

The Republicans are right on one thing. Obama’s campaign pledge to close Guantanamo was based on naivety for underestimating the legal entanglements created by the Bush administration.
Cross posted on The Remmers Report M

  • jwest
    “Palau’s accommodation to accept the temporary resettlement of these detainees is a humanitarian gesture….”

    I’m sure the $200 million didn’t enter into their decision. Apparently, Jerry, you were pretty sure also, since you conveniently left that out of your article.

    Is the reason for exclusion of this fact that you didn’t think the money mattered to the government of Palau? Did you believe your readers wouldn’t understand the article if you made it too complex with big numbers?

    Why is it that leftist articles always seem to leave out key pieces of information that would lead a reader to question the conclusions of the author?

    I would hope that in the future you might trust your readers with all the facts rather than assume everyone is a useful idiot.
  • jkremmers
    Check the link. At this early stage, facts you seek are not in evidence.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    This article does, in fact, say the following:
    Anonymous government sources said Palau will be compensated with $200 million and its treaty with the U.S. for self-defense will be renegotiated later this year.
  • jwest
    In the spirit of comity and to help our President, I herby offer to temporarily resettle some detainees in my basement.

    I will need $200 million, but that in no way influences my humanitarian offer.

    Working together for Hope and Change.
  • DLS
    J. West -- we have the solution to the terrorist-incarceration problem right here at home, on the US mainland. It even can appeal to the anti-progress anti-nuclear dirtbags, if only we can muzzle troublemaker Harry Reid (who is up to no good along with Nancy Pelosi in Congress, as usual, on any given day, as a rule).

    We should create a new super-super-maximum security facility and house the terrorists at Yucca Mountain.

    That should shut the idiots up once and for all. (But it won't...)
  • jwest is deathly afraid of even releasing presumptively innocent people from our prisons. One might inquire as to how he would feel if he were wrongly imprisoned. Would he gladly accept never being released despite the lack of evidence? Would he gladly submit to "enhanced interrogation techniques"?
  • DLS
    By the way, Chris WWW, you specifically are _not_ an anti-progress, anti-nuclear dirtbag. (Your main quibble, or at least the key fact you use to veto nuclear ventures, is rational -- it's with the huge costs up front to get the reactors built, and up and running.) Were more people that sane rather than demonizing what's not PC...

    I'd actually like someday to see Guantanamo not only emptied of prisoners (released if innocent, relocated to the USA or executed if they did something wrong against our forces), but Guantanamo completely evacuated and given (back) to Cuba along with an end to the embargo in an eventual change and thawing in Cuba policy.

    Obama has been accused of lies by omission or deceit in this manner in the past, but the speeches he has given recently have been quite good -- he does a great job at this task. What I find interesting is that he seems in his speeches to do what few lefties do, try making logical, compelling arguments and explanations for his positions (or the federal government's position) on things. This was true for example not only for his speech on Guantanamo prisoners and related issues (hyped mercilessly as part of a "duel" with Cheney -- amusingly, both speakers admonished the left-wing Dems who want to crucify Bush and Cheney to this day) but also with his speech in Cairo about the USA and the Middle East. He does more, better explaining in his speeches lately than his press spokesman does in the press briefings.
  • Jess_newsy
    I'm sure in negotiations with all the other countries there was money involved and none of them offered to take in the ex-detainees. SO this really was a humanitarian effort. And it shows Palau isn't scared of China.
    http://tinyurl.com/l2p8se
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC