An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

GOP Moderate Picked For China Ambassador

Huntsman_c.u._796736.pngAbout a month ago John McCain was asked on one of those political talk shows who he thought were viable Republican presidential candidates in 2012.

The first name mentioned was Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman.

My first reaction was “who is that guy?” I filed the name in the back of my mind as a to-do list to check out some day. Utah is not exactly the news capital of the universe.

President Barack Obama beat me to the punch. The president Saturday nominated Huntsman as U.S. Ambassador to China.

In reading his bio, Huntsman speaks Mandarin Chinese (a top priority to my way of thinking), and served as ambassador to Singapore under President George H.W. Bush and as a deputy U.S. trade representative and U.S. trade ambassador under President George W. Bush.

He is a popular two-term governor in a state dominated by The Church Of Latter Day Saints where he has developed a reputation for his moderate brand of political governing.

In short, he is my kind of Republican. Obama must share that opinion and without being too sinister effectively removes Huntsman as a rival in the 2012 presidential race should the Senate ratify the appointment. Okay, it may be sinister from a political viewpoint but that does not detract from the qualifications the Utah governor brings to the diplomatic table.

Huntsman, 49, learned Mandarin from his days as a Mormon missionary in Taiwan, and is regarded for his experience in trade matters between the two nations and as an environmentalist.

He signed an initiative that would set a regional cap-and-trade effort to reduce global warming. And in a 2006 speech at Shanghai Normal University, Huntsman spoke of the need for China and the U.S. to work together to protect the environment.

“The United States and China must be good examples and stewards of the Earth. We must match economic progress with environmental stewardship. The effects of industrialization are felt worldwide,” Huntsman said then.

As governor, Huntsman quietly negotiated the loosening of the state’s rigid liquor laws in an effort to attract more tourism to the state.

Huntsman made headlines recently for encouraging the Republican Party to swing in a more moderate direction if it wanted to bounce back from the 2008 elections. He favors civil unions for gay couples although he supported a 2004 state constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage.

These positions have drawn the ire of Republican conservatives.

Before becoming governor in 2005, Huntsman made millions serving as chairman and chief executive of his family chemical company.

If confirmed by the Senate, Huntsman will succeed Clark Randt as U.S. ambassador to China.

Utah Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert would become governor until a special election in 2010.

Unless there’s something creepy in his portfolio, Huntsman seems a good choice. But politics being what they are, I’m standing by to hear the expected mumbling by conservative Republicans complaining he’s too moderate, moderate Republicans grumbling because they lost another piece of presidential timber, other Republicans complaining the appointment is a diabolical plot and some party loyalist Democrats bitching it should have been one of theirs.
Cross posted on The Remmers Report

  • StockBoySF
    He's a Republican moderate- he would not have survived the GOP primary if he were to run for prez.

    Besides, why does this take him out of the running for prez in four (or three) years? He has the creds as a guv, and this post- to China, hugely important, only gives him additional experience. And if he does run as prez he can link himself to the popular Obama (if Obama stays popular).
  • jchem
    SB: "He's a Republican moderate- he would not have survived the GOP primary if he were to run for prez."

    C'mon StockBoy, who did the Republicans just run for president? I know they are in their own special version of AA, but I think some of the folks on that side of the aisle can say that they tried moderating and they lost anyway. Hence all of the ideological purity tests going on now.

    To the post at hand, I share the same question you do. Why would this stint as ambassador take Gov Huntsman out of the 2012 cycle? It seems to me that this would polish his credentials more than anything else he could do at the moment.
  • PJBFan
    This was a brilliant, and definitely behind-saving move by Obama. He removed one of the most effective choices the GOP has for President, if only he could get past the evangelicals in the primary. This was to keep Huntsman from being the best available candidate to beat Obama in the 2012 Race.
  • superdestroyer
    Huntsman is not comptent enough to be President. The Gov. is too stupid to realize that open borders and unlimited immigration leads to higher taxes, bigger government, and less freedom. If Huntsman wants to have the size and scope of government requried to support open borders and unlimited immigraiton, then he is definitely not a conservative by any means.

    Maybe after being in China for a few years, he will understand what happens to a government in a country that must support unsustainable population growth.
  • TonyP4
    Never use our yardstick on human right on a developing country like China.

    American contributes more pollution per capita than China esp. some pollution is caused by manufacturing for global consumers.

    We can build carriers powered by two nuclear generators and China cannot build helicopters. What a joke!
  • StockBoySF
    jchem, "C'mon StockBoy, who did the Republicans just run for president? I know they are in their own special version of AA, but I think some of the folks on that side of the aisle can say that they tried moderating and they lost anyway. Hence all of the ideological purity tests going on now."

    Well, the purging of the GOP of its moderate members began before the election... witness the demonization of moderate Republicans like Colin Powell who came out in support of Obama. As far as running McCain.... The others were running more to the right of McCain and they scared a lot of people. If a conservative Republican could not win the Republican primary, then there was no way a conservative Republican would have won the general election. It's not as though there was a "Group of Twelve" Republicans who sat around some table and debated the merits of running a moderate or right winger and decided to go with a moderate. The Republicans themselves voted for McCain in the primary season. And many of the "more moderate than McCain" Republicans switched parties in the primary and voted for Obama.

    The purity tests are only more evident now. In the past a Republican had to actually DO something to "betray" the Republican Party (such as support a candidate of another party). Now the Republican leaders are saying (essentially), "We don't want you at our table unless you are willing to accept all our positions, no exceptions." Now the GOP is in effect thought police. The GOP tells you what to believe and if you don't then you're out.

    Though I DO get that many Republicans think that they need to "get back to basics." Unfortunately they run for office saying one thing and then do something completely the opposite once they are in office... they have zero credibility left. And their "leaders" right now are just entertainment... metaphorically and literally.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC