An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

While We Talk Truth Commissions, Others Target Bush Torture Lawyers in Criminal Probe

A few weeks ago, Patrick Leahy, six-term Democratic Senator from Vermont, a former prosecutor and the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee wrote an article in TIME titled “The Case for a Truth Commission.”

In it, the Senator discusses the abuses during the Bush administration years—such as the scandal at Abu Ghraib, the disclosure of torture memos and the revelations about the warrantless surveillance of Americans.

Leahy then asks, “So what is to be done about the abuses of the Bush years?”

He discusses two possibilities:

1. Doing nothing, “and a few Senators even tried to make Attorney General Eric Holder promise in his confirmation hearings to launch no prosecutions for Bush-era lawbreaking”

2. Prosecuting Bush administration officials, as “others say that even if it takes many years and divides the country and distracts from the urgent priority of fixing the economy, we must prosecute Bush Administration officials to lay down a marker.”

Leahy then discusses another option, one which he prefers: “[A] middle ground whose overarching goal is to find the truth: we need to get to the bottom of what happened–and why–to make sure it never happens again.”

How? Again, Leahy:

One path to that goal is to appoint a truth-finding panel. We could develop and authorize a person or group of people universally recognized as fair-minded and without an ax to grind. Their straightforward mission would be to find the truth. People would be invited to come forward and share their knowledge and experiences, not for purposes of constructing criminal indictments but to assemble the facts. If needed, such a process could involve subpoena powers and even the authority to obtain immunity from prosecution in order to get to the whole truth.

And,

In the meantime, Congress will work with the Obama Administration to fix those parts of our government that went off course. But to repair the damage of the past eight years and restore America’s reputation and standing in the world, we should not simply turn the page without being able first to read it. A recent USA Today/Gallup poll showed that more than 60% of Americans agree that investigating the failed national-security policies of the past eight years should be considered.

In a letter to TIME (not published), I expressed my views on this issue:

I have to reluctantly agree with Senator Leahy that we should take the middle road “to find the truth.” Not because I believe, as the Senator does, that this will “make sure it never happens again,” because when justice is not served bad things will certainly happen again. I agree with him because I am a realist and, sadly, this “middle ground” may be the best we can hope for in our “political democracy.”

But while we are contemplating what should be done about the Bush era abuses, it appears that other countries are past the “contemplation” stage.

At least, according to an article, “Bush Torture Lawyers Targeted in Criminal Probe,” appearing today in Harper’s Magazine.

Harper’s reports:

One of America’s NATO allies—which supported the Bush Administration’s war on terror by committing its troops to the struggle–has now opened formal criminal inquiries looking into the Bush team’s legacy of torture. The action parallels a criminal probe into allegations of torture involving the American CIA that was opened this week in the United Kingdom

And,

Spain’s national newspapers, El País and Público reported that the Spanish national security court has opened a criminal probe focusing on Bush Administration lawyers who pioneered the descent into torture at the prison in Guantánamo. The criminal complaint can be examined here. Público identifies the targets as University of California law professor John Yoo, former Department of Defense general counsel William J. Haynes II (now a lawyer working for Chevron), former vice presidential chief-of-staff David Addington, former attorney general and White House counsel Alberto Gonzales, former Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee, now a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and former Undersecretary of Defense Doug Feith.

To read more about these surprising developments, please click here.

  • daveinboca
    This Spanish court has become a 21st c. version of the Inquisition a rebours. The leftist "judges" have been chasing former leaders in Europe to extradite them and tried to try Pinochet while he was in a hospital bed in London.

    The left has discovered that judicial tyranny is another avenue to advance its agenda via crooked judges, the kind Leahy does his best to appoint.
  • DdW
    This "nice" guy, Pinochet, was responsible for the murder, torture or disappearance of over 3,000 innocent men, women and children in Chile. (Remember Saddam Hussein? Wasn't something like this one of the alleged reasons we invaded Iraq?). Among these innocent victims, were 79 Spanish citizens. That's how Spain was able to bring Pinochet to justice.

    On October 16th, 1998, a Spanish judge, Baltasar Garzón, requested General Pinochet's extradition to Spain for egregious human-rights crimes committed by a military junta led by General Pinochet, who later became Chile's head of state, following the brutal coup of 11 September 1973 that brought the junta to power deposing and killing the democratically elected President of Chile Salvador Allende. Over 3,000 people would die in the aftermath of the coup among them scores of foreigners residing in Chile. The warrant issued for the arrest of Pinochet regarded the murder, torture, or disappearance of 79 Spanish citizens. In the absence of appropriate redress at home, the relatives of thousands of people who had been tortured, murdered or forcibly "disappeared" in Chile during the Pinochet era had submitted complaints to Spanish and other European state courts which provided for universal jurisdiction under national law. The day after the extradiction request, General Pinochet was arrested on a Spanish provisional warrant for the murder of those 79 Spanish citizens in Chile under his political responsability. Five days later, Pinochet was served with a second provisional arrest warrant from the Spanish investigating judges Baltasar Garzón and Manuel García Castellón, charging him with systematic torture, murder, illegal detention, and forced disappearances.

    It is now this same tough dude, Judge Baltasar Garzón, who is involved in the investigation of Bush's alleged co-conspirators. Garzón is Europe’s best known counterterrorism magistrate, responsible for hundreds of cases targeting the activities of ETA and related Basque terrorist organizations



    By the way, he also spearheaded the successful investigation of Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist organizations operating in the Maghreb region, including Spanish enclaves in Morocco.

    Inquisition, you say?



    Si se puede, hombre!
  • AustinRoth
    Dorian -

    I am surprised you do not see the dangerous slipperly slope. While I disagree with the concept of international courts going after Bush and Cheney, at least the logic has some soundness to it. If we stand by and allow those same courts to start diving down the food chain, so to speak, then we are allowing the creation of a new Nuremberg War Trails, but without a direct charter. What is a very possible progression? Why, to start arresting and putting on trial Military officers for any civilian deaths. I wish I had more time to more fully flesh this line of thought out, but the gist is obvious. Is this path, not just the initial players involved, one you support?
  • DdW
    Thanks for your comments AR.

    My first reaction, also without fleshing it out, is : Yes, go after the big fish, too! That's what we should have done with the Abu Ghraib "scandals." Instead we went after some poor low-ranking troops. Yes, go for the real culprits, the ones who gave the orders; the ones who knew about it and closed their eyes.

    Furthermore, why do we have to rely on foreign countries to do our dirty work?? Why can't we do it ourselves?

    Finally, talking about a "slippery slope," I believe an even more slippery, and dangerous, slope is to let those who corrupted our Constitution, violated our laws and our justice system, get off scot-free.
  • HemmD
    Little fish lead to the big fish. Why try Watergate plumbers? Why track down concentration guards? The International court may not be the preferred venue, but at least somebody is trying to enforce the rule of law.

    It is shameful that the US has allowed these breaches in law to go unpunished. I mean, we are a nation of laws, aren't we?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC