An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama Unveils Road Map for Afghanistan

Joe Gandelman has pretty much covered the waterfront on this one.

So here is only one more perspective, from the New York Times.

Basically, President Obama outlined plans to further increase the presence of American forces in Afghanistan (4,000 more troops to train Afghan security forces on top of the 17,000 extra combat troops that he already has ordered to Afghanistan); increase aid to Pakistan to the tune of $1.5 billion every year over the next five years; and setting benchmarks to measure progress in fighting Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

On those benchmarks, according to the New York Times

Although the administration is still developing the specific benchmarks for Afghanistan and Pakistan, officials said they would be the most explicit demands ever presented to the governments in Kabul and Islamabad. In effect, Mr. Obama would be insisting that two fractured countries plagued by ancient tribal rivalries and modern geopolitical hostility find ways to work together and transform their societies.

The $1.5 billion a year in aid to Pakistan would be used for strengthening its democratic institutions there and for basic infrastructure improvements such as building roads and schools.

Prominent Democrats expressed support for the President’s plans.

Reaction from Republicans was also favorable.

Republican Senator Olympia J. Snowe of Maine said:

“Today, the president presented Congress and the American people with an honest assessment of our strategic position in Afghanistan and underscored that America’s core mission must be redefined.” But added, that increased American aid must be “carefully targeted,” and that the Pakistan and Afghanistan must be pressured to do their part.

Interestingly, perhaps ominously, The Times adds:

All told, the 21,000 additional American troops that Mr. Obama will have authorized almost precisely matches the original number of additional troops that President George W. Bush sent to Iraq two years ago, bringing the overall American deployment in Afghanistan to about 60,000. But Mr. Obama avoids calling it a “surge” and resisted sending the full reinforcements initially sought by commanders.

The Times offers some more words of caution.

To read the full report, please go to the New York Times’ “Obama Unveils Afghan Plan to Add Troops and Set Goals.”

  • Skaredykatt
    I was watching a clip yesterday of Obama's speech about Terrorism and it looks as if they plagerized GWB's speeches on terrorism. They were showing what Bush said in a speech and then showing what Obama said. They were mirror images of each other. The antiwar was protesting in the streets over Bush. Today they are worshipping Obama.

    The problem for me is that Bush was genuine, sincere and he was passionate about the speech he was giving. Obama had a look of disdain on his face, had no emotion and looked as if someone were holding a gun to his head while giving this speech.

    Why not just pull out Obama. You know you want too. It would save us lots of money, more young men and womens lives and we can return to fighting terrorists the old way.

    Scream bloddy murder when they blow stuff up. Its cheaper building new embassies a couple times a year.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC