I think the future of the Republican Party lies in the states. It will be the governors leading the way. There is one governor out there that I do think represents the future of the GOP if party leaders are wise enough to listen.
No, I am not talking about Bobby Jindal.
I am talking about Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, who is a conservative that actually lives and works outside the conservative cocoon. From an interview in Politico, here is his take on the stimulus:
It’s easy to criticize the bill and if you don’t like it, you don’t have to take the money. It’s pretty simple.
I guess in hindsight we can all say that there were some fundamental flaws with it. It probably wasn’t large enough and, number two, there probably wasn’t enough stimulus effect. For example, a payroll tax exemption or maybe even a cut in the corporate tax…for small and medium-sized businesses for three years, for example.
We will take the money…I’m not sure it’s the stimulus money that will necessarily allow the economy to recover…It will help to fortify our budgets, frankly, to ensure that there isn’t as much backsliding in the areas of education and healthcare, for example. But economic recovery must be earned. And it will be earned by entrepreneurs and it will be earned by small businesses.
His take on free trade and the “Buy American” rhetoric coming from the Democrats:
That’s shades of Smoot-Hawley, 1931…When America closes its doors, so does everybody else. We are the primary engine of growth in the world and we are the only beacon of free trade left, and open markets.
His views on the current state of the GOP:
…we will be irrelevant as a party until we become the party of solutions and until we become the party of preeminence.
Huntsman has come out in favor of civil unions for same-sex couples and is very pro-environment.
Huntsman hits all the right notes for a vibrant 21-century conservatism: seeing government as a needed part of society but not the end all and be all, believing in entrepreneurship and free trade and supporting the environment and the right for all Americans to live in freedom.
Listen to Jindal’s speech this morning, what I heard was a conservatism of the past- where government was seen as an impediment. As David Brooks has said, people want the government to do something during these tense times, so the argument between liberals and conservatives has to be how government can help and how much of a role should it have.
Rush can have Jindal, my heart is with Huntsman.
Sanity in (at least for me) a completely unexpected place – Utah!? He seems, oddly enough given the current state of our political affairs, a real “loyal opposition” candidate for the Republicans to run with. Given his sensible, sale-able position, the Limbaughs and Hannitys of the party will quickly deem him an apostate, label him a RINO, and in short order, attempt to run him outta' town on a rail (tarred and feathered).
Utah will not be the savoirs of the Republican Party. Upper middle class coastal whites hate Mormons with a passion (See the reactions to Mitt Romney). He is an example of why the Republicans will not make a comeback. As soon as someone claiming to be a conservatgive is put in charge of some portion of the government, those so-called Republicans want it to grow.
Maybe if Gov. Huntsman could provide examples of where he cut government spending, he would have some credbility but I doubt that would be able ot. After eight years of the incompetence and stupidity of the Bush Administration, one would think at compassionate conservatism would have zero credibility. But since it is the left that is promoting it, we can obviously see that there is nothing conservative about it.