An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Returning to the Silly Season

The parties are mostly over and maintenance crews are cleaning up the streets in Washington. Since we gave the politicians and their supporters a brief break for frivolity, it’s only fair that we be allowed a few moments to observe some of the silliness surrounding the day’s events.

Our first item comes from Amanda Carpenter over at Town Hall. For the record, I really like Amanda. We were just having some fun yesterday with her, in fact, during an interview on Ed Morrissey’s show. But her comments on the inauguration still deserve a mention in passing.

The utter lack of ooh-ing and ah-ing over Michelle Obama’s inauguration wear should tell you something. It was bad.

She’s worn beautiful things in the past. I tend to think saturated, jewel tones (royal purple, forest green, dark teal, deep orange) look great on her. That split-pea/yellow color she wore earlier today, however, is impossible for 95 percent of women to carry off. I’d say Michelle is included in that number. She sure does seem to like that chartreuse-y tone, though.The famous JCrew outfit she wrote on Jay Leno has the same color scheme.

If that particular hue becomes a crayola crayon, I think it should be named “sour sunshine.”

Really, Amanda? Of all the events of the day, our takeaway should be that the First Lady isn’t enough of a clothes horse? In her defense, Ms. Carpenter (assuming that is her name now, since she just got married) makes an effort to explain why this is important.

For all you men out there, understand clothes and makeup are like football for women. We can talk about it with anybody, it’s a good icebreaker, it’s always fun. We’ll be saying “What did you think of Michelle’s dress?” at the water coolers while you all are crying about your NFL team not making it to the Superbowl.

No. I’m sorry, but… no. It’s not the same thing. It’s not in the same ballpark. It’s not even in the same state. I suppose I don’t care if you want to criticize what Michelle Obama chooses to wear, but please do NOT try to compare it to football. The Superbowl is in less than two weeks, and it is an event of such magnitude that the election of Barack Obama as president is nearly as important. Try to keep that in mind when your husband returns home. Hey… I’m just trying to help here.

A second item comes to us from The Wall Street Journal. It seems that Bernie Madoff has claimed another victim, and this time it’s PETA.

The downfall of Bernard Madoff has claimed a far-flung, new victim: a plan by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals to lobby Barack Obama at the inaugural festivities to be a vegetarian.

The animal-welfare organization viewed Mr. Obama’s election as a turning point. So when PETA saw that Mr. Obama would win the election last summer, the group began looking for a way to get an audience with Mr. Obama.

Apparently their plans to “lobby” President Obama into becoming a vegan were thwarted because the scheme relied on some tickets won through an online auction. The provider fell victim to Madoff’s schemes and couldn’t deliver the tickets. Ah, what a cruel web we weave. If Barack Obama wants to ensure that I won’t support him in a single thing that he does for the next four years, he can knuckle under to PETA and start serving veggie burgers in the West Wing. Fortunately, I think our new president is more intelligent, pragmatic and has better taste in food than to fall for such nonsense. But I thought the story was odd enough to share with you today.

And last, while not really “silly” as such, I wanted to take a moment to address the spectators at the inauguration who chose to boo and heckle President Bush and Vice President Cheney. That was despicable and you should be ashamed. I was no fan of many of George W. Bush’s decisions and policies, and frankly I found Cheney to be offensive many times during his term in office. I’m also well aware that there are few limits on freedom of speech and the right to protest. But there’s a time and place for everything. Yesterday should have been a happy, joyous occasion for you if you supported President Obama’s bid for the White House. Using the opportunity to vent bile is simply lacks class and puts a blemish on what should have otherwise been a wonderful day for you.

  • Marlowecan
    An unbelievable post by Jazz . . . praising Football at the expense of Fashion. . . revealing a hitherto undiscovered Death Wish on his part.

    We can safely anticipate there won't be any posts from Jazz past the Superbowl.
    Will it be arsenic-laced chicken wings, or perhaps pizza? No, it will probably be in the beer...

    The first comment I heard about the whole extravaganza was when the First Ladies stepped out of the limousine.
    "Well, that's unfortunate."

    Laura Bush got better marks. I was surprised about that.
    I was informed what is apparently common knowledge about Tipper Gore aiding Hilary Clinton in dumping her wardrobe errors before entering the White House.
    Presumably someone will have a talk with Michelle Obama.

    I was very impressed with the ceremony yesterday (with the notable exception of the bloviating Warren)...and particularly with how Obama dealt with the Chief Justice's flub.
    There was no sense that Obama was visibly annoyed with having his moment marred. One could see Obama's moment of realization that Roberts had the line wrong, and then he smiled and went along.
    Class.

    In contrast, the hecklers were classless.
    Not unexpected, though.

    Bush's election in 2005 was marked, for me, by the British Guardian newspaper asking: "Where is John Wilkes Booth or Harvey Oswald when you need them?"
    As he was welcomed by his opponents, at winning a democratic election, with such grace and class . . . I suppose Bush should feel lucky his opponents only heckled his departure.
  • Silhouette
    Wow, "giving marks" for women based on how they're dressed...for sex-objectifying

    I hear they used to be into "giving marks" for black slaves based on how big the muscles of their buttocks were...for work potential...

    Oh my yes, what progress we've made as a nation..
  • Marlowecan
    Hahaha...Sil, it is a matter of aesthetics I think, more than sex-objectifying.

    It may just be socialization...but most straight women I know are lightning swift in their visual analyses of clothing and styles...most straight men I know are pretty thick.
    (Gay men and lesbians of my acquaintance fit into both camps...so who knows from gender?)

    I find that having female accompaniment when shopping for clothes saves immense time and anxiety.
    "Yes" or "No" are declared definitively and reassuringly.

    In re: your comment about "what progress we've made as a nation" perhaps Barbara Walters's comment - in Jazz's link - is enlightening:

    "Barbara Walters, who said on The View, the other day, "I think you can tell what the Administration is going to be like by what the First Lady wears."

    I thought this was utterly absurd when I read it, but I have since been put in my place: Mamie Eisenhower's hideously conservative confections...Jackie Kennedy's cool French style...Nancy Reagan's "Dynasty" gowns...

    Could it be true?

    Unlike Jazz....I hope to live past the Superbowl...so will say nada more.
  • roro80
    I liked the outfit, personally. Not what I would have chosen, to be sure, but as the ceremony went on, it grew on me. The fabric was gorgeous, and the cut worked well for her. The gloves weren't great, but eh, whatever.

    I don't personally mind the football/fashion comparison. Fashion is something that a small group of women are fully fanatic about, some really couldn't care less, but most women have at least a passing interest in the subject, enough to have an opinion.

    As to comparing the praise/criticism of the first lady's dress to slave buttocks, I'd say that's pretty insulting, all around.
  • CStanley
    I liked the outfit too (the one for the inaugural ceremony- her ball gown was pretty but not flattering to her, which is odd because she generally has a great physique for clothes.)

    And in Amanda Hall's defense, there have been tons of gushing articles on Michelle's fashion sense ever since Obama took the lead during campaign season, so it's not as though she suddenly decided to bring this up out of the blue to write something b*tchy .

    Plus, she's right about the sports analogy. I recall early in the Bush adminstration seeing Condi Rice several times greeting female heads of state and I'd have sworn they were complimenting each other's outfits. It seemed a bit odd at first, but I'm sure that the male equivalent of small talk goes on during those meet and greets all the time as well.
  • Silhouette
    Dark-skinned people look good in all manner of bright and unique colors. Put that color on me though and people would start projectile vomiting. ..lol.. It worked well for her. I think it was a fine color for January, the cold. It reminded me of certain tourmaline stones I've seen. It grew on me too.

    And I could care less what marks she got or what B. Walters said about fashion reflecting an administration. WTF?
  • I'm not a vegan or vegetarian, but I want to remind you that while PETA may = vegan, that doesn't mean vegan = PETA. :P I know several vegans and vegetarians that I assure you are not of the PETA type. One I'm pretty certain is some shade of libertarian.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC