An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Bush Hecklers Leave a Stain on Obama Inauguration

It’s not a stretch to say that ex-President Bush has carried himself with the utmost dignity in his final two months in office – going beyond what previous outgoing administrations have done for the new guy. From expediting security checks for now-President Obama’s nominees to giving him national security briefings in Chicago, the Bush team gave the new administration everything it needed to hit the ground running. So far, no reports of the letter “H” missing from the White House keyboards either. You’d think Number 43 could get some respect on his way out of office.

Not on the National Mall, from what I saw and heard from others.

I walked across the Memorial Bridge to the Mall from Arlington to see the inauguration, and was running late. Listening to the NPR broadcast from the Mall, I heard loud boos following the introduction of Bush and some Republican leaders as they approached the platform. Loud enough to be very apparent on my headphones, and for the New York Times live-blogger to notice, though I can’t say how widespread it was.

Getting to the other side of the bridge, I noticed a giant inflatable statue, but didn’t bother to look more closely, as Obama was a few minutes into his speech and I didn’t want to miss it. The rest of the ceremony was fine, mostly memorable from my perch at the Reflecting Pool for the brisk commerce that was still going in merchandise bearing Obama’s visage (and especially his family’s). As I headed back to the bridge, I noticed a crowd forming around that inflatable statue. It was George W. Bush in a Saddam Hussein-in-the-town-square pose, and a group of yucksters “tore” it down and threw stuff at the statue (no shoes, oddly enough). Talk about an apt comparison, huh? It wasn’t lighthearted – it was just mean-spirited. Apparently there was another inflatable Bush statue dressed in a flight suit up the road that other sore winners had their way with. Heckling also followed the ex-president as his helicopter to Andrews Air Force Base took off, the Times reported. (You can see photos of the inflatable Bush and mostly crowd shots in my Flickr set.)

Meeting up later with friends who were much closer to the West Lawn, I learned of some drunken heckling, this time of George H.W. Bush and Barbara, calling her a “racist grandmother” and yelling “Go back to Houston!” Not the respect that an ex-First Family deserves.

Why does this bother me so much? Protesters have always dogged leaders. You could say this heckling was rather mild, although I’m sure that the 25,000 cops in town and Secret Service roaming through the crowd tamped down expectations of what people could get away with.

Here’s the thing. It’s hard to think of a recent president leaving office more unpopular than Bush did. Two wars, financial crisis, and some of the more interesting debates about the breadth of executive power we may see for a while. Yet this is a man who had no blueprint for what to do after September 11, which like it or not, is still the foremost thought in the mind of any official tasked with protecting this country. You can argue with what Bush did, whether Iraq was a good move or at least will turn out to be a relatively successful country in a region brooding with oil money and disaffected young men. But clearly he was operating out of his convictions about what a leader should be doing, and those decisions in some way clinched him a second term. His oft-quoted examples were Churchill and Truman, leaders during extremely difficult and controversial times of war who left office with a “Kick Me” sign on their backs. Surely this is a man who risked everything to do what he thought was right, to protect the American people – to take his oath of office seriously, and as a side effect took some bad advice from people with their own agenda. I’ve long thought Bush’s biggest problem was his excessive loyalty to officials who should have been shuffling along. But let’s not forget the context in which he governed.

The treatment of the outgoing 43 by the incoming 44’s biggest fans has made me almost nostalgic for the painfully earnest media coverage of the past few weeks, highlighting the “historic” nature of the inauguration to no end, perhaps because pundits and anchors have nothing original to say (shocking). The endless paeans to our non-ideological president led to believe that maybe, just maybe, Obama’s candidacy had summoned the “better angels of our nature” for a wide swath of America. From what I saw and heard today, I guess that was premature.

  • D. E.Rodriguez
    "It’s not a stretch to say that ex-President Bush has carried himself with the utmost dignity in his final two months in office."

    He may have done so---part of his legacy re-frabrication efforts---but how about the preceding seven years and ten months!
  • StockBoySF
    I could have done without the hecklers- how petty and low class. But let's be glad we live in a country where we can express our feelings.
  • aba23
    It is a shame when people are disrespectful. You know what's really a shame? When a president is. We have endured 8 years of an administration that has utterly failed to show respect for the governed. A great many Americans feel like they have been at best ignored, at worst lied to, and nearly always sneered at. (Dare not to protest the decider, lest you be pronounced in league with the enemy. For christ's sake, they actually said this.) Bush effectively ignored half the country while his staff and cabinet members endeavored to undermine their very representation as their primary order of business. This exaggerated politicization of the White House demeaned the office of the president beneath anything we've seen in over 30 years. So, yeah, people heckled the poor man--bad on them. As for Bush, the best I can say about him is that he never had any business being anywhere near a public office.
  • georgereilly
    What gets me is that people talk about the last 8 years as if Bush was in their living room every day. The real issue is that Congress and the Legislative branch did the work. Bush is a convenient target because he is a national figure. The real changes are at the local level, check how your state legislature has changed taxes as have the congress. Bush is a convenient scapegoat for national issues. Unlike in the UK where the Prime Minister, through the majority of Parliament, can change the country's laws very quickly Bush can only set the tone, at best, for changing the country. Shortly after the Dunblane massacre in the UK, assault weapons were banned (full stop). In the US, we have had several events as bad or worse than Dunblane and still assault weapons can be purchased. Bush had, at best, an indirect role in people's lives. That the public dislike him is more a measure of the media hyping the issues rather than the public taking a hard look at their own government, their own community and their own lives to understand how the nation works and what it achieves. Bush did not create the financial crisis, it was Americans who were greedy and without moral scruples. Look at Barry Bonds and Mark Macgwire as examples from the sports world.

    Bush asked for a change in the culture on 20 September 2001 and the country did not respond. Moreover, he tried to change the culture in 2005/2006 when he sought to reform the social security system because he was trying to restore the long term economic vitality of the country but the public did not want to sacrifice today for tomorrow. Now that Obama is in in charge, perhaps they will head Bush's call to change the country's culture.

    In 6 years, I am certain that Obama's popularity will decrease but he will not have had to respond to a 11 september attack, fight two wars, and handle a finacial crisis without power. If his actions meet his campaign rhetoric then we have a chance. I fear that as a Chicago politicians we are going to have Chicago politics on a grand scale as porkbarrel projects abound. The country was not ready to change in the deepest crisis, 20 September 2001, and why should it change now when the one person asking them to eat their vegetables has left. Once Obama has to tell the public to eat their vegetables and there is no dessert, his popularity will slip. Alas, he, or rather his advisers, wil not do the right thing and they will start doling out the welfare sweets.
  • Kathryn
    As someone who is thrilled to see the last of George Bush, I must share the disappointment in the booing and heckling. One of the reasons I so strongly support President Obama is because I agree that we have to get past this tit for tat view of politics. There are certainly ways to show displeasure towards the former administration, but yesterday's display lacks class.

    However, in the spirit of evenhandedness, I am also disappointed in Rush Limbaugh's hope for a failed presidency, even if a failed presidency leads to business's going under, wars spinning out of control or an attack on our soil. Limbaugh sees America as so imperfect he wishes for its destruction.
  • aba23
    georgereilly is right when he refutes the notion a president is responsible for everything that happens on his watch, but I think he understates the power that the office provides to someone who can provide true leadership. Perhaps the way to deal with a stultifying Congress is to not shut them out but to engage them; at times, maybe sometimes it's necessary to sow the seeds of your agenda in the grassroots, appeal to the citizenry directly and encourage civic participation on the local level. I don't believe Bush was insincere in staking out policies he believed in (some of which made sense and would have had widespread benefits, like immigration reform, and some of which would have been catastrophic failures, like his approach to social security reform, which would have devastating effects in a market like the current one). In my opinion, his greatest failure was one of leadership, certainly with respect to reaching outside his party, but also in revitalizing his own. (By the way, Bush did not ask us to eat our vegetables--he requested that we go out and shop and look the other way while he frittered away nearly a trillion dollars on a war that, whatever its long-term outcome, failed to meet its short-term ones in stunning fashion.)
  • elrod
    Georgereilly,
    That's an odd point. For six of Bush's eight years, the Congress was under the control of the Republican Party, and was unusually pliant to the demands of President Bush.

    And talk about Bush asking us to eat our vegetables? Asking for a change of culture in September 2001? Bush asked for nothing. He promised tax cuts and asked people to go shopping.

    As for Social Security, the purpose was not to fix the system but to dismantle it and create a vast private Ponzi scheme that would create Republican voters out of young people.

    Not a single thing Bush did was done without thought of cynical politics. And the incompetence was the bitter fruit of a failed ideology that proved that government can't work.

    Good riddance to Bush and conservative Republicanism.
  • greenschemes
    Barak Obama ran on a 3000 dollar tax credit to create jobs. When asked about such a credit a leading Democratic Senator looked around rather suspiciously as if he was being followed and said "I dont know of anyone on the hill that supports that idea." Later Barak Obama admitted that it wont work and stopped asking for it. Of course this was AFTER the election.

    Who runs government? I can promise you it is not the President of the United States.
  • rbchilds
    Having lived and traveled throughout Europe and Southeast Asia the one thing that I have been very cognizance of is the Ugly American syndrome. I have seen Americans be very disrespectful of local traditions and customs in foreign countries, because of their higher than thou attitudes. Whether you liked Bush or not, the booing, hissing and shouts of profanity at Bush during the Obama inauguration was uncalled for. It's display is how the country is going, disrespectful, no class, shameless, inconsiderate moral values - or should I say no moral values. Not only was this moronic display leveled at Pres. Bush and VP Cheney, but their wives as well. Did these morally inept people ever think that this display was also disrespectful to Pres. Obama as well. On a day of historical significance, the Ugly American raised his head and showed the world just how far we have not come.
  • ravens
    Just goes to show the mentality of those that voted for BO. What an embarrassment to the U.S. and what it says about our people.
  • mlhradio
    Does Bush deserve the people's respect, if he fails to show the least amount of respect to the people? For eight years he has shown nothing but utter contempt towards the American public, so why should he expect anything different in return?

    Should the Iraqi people have shown respect when Hussein was pushed out of office? How about Nicolei Ceaucescu? Augusto Pinochet? Ferdinand Marcos? Francisco Franco?
  • Bush is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. He is responsible for the destruction of Iraq, and is in large part to blame for the destruction of New Orleans. He weakened environmental protections despite the international scientific consensus on global warming.

    Then there is the issue of torture and warrantless surveillance, crimes which Bush should be put on trial for committing.

    The truth is that the stain of yesterday was watching Obama and the rest of Washington congratulate themselves after playing no small role in the devastation of the last eight years. If these men and women aren't willing to prosecute those who admitted to crimes, like Bush and Cheney, then the least we can do is heckle them.
  • DLS
    The "impeach Bush" or "prosecute Bush" idiots were there at the Inauguration. In addition, the low-life scum were there and were discussed as "undignified" on lefty talk radio -- the low-life scum who saluted the Bushes as they left the White House by helicopter to begin their trip to Texas, saluting them with middle fingers. They were low-life scum. I was not surprised, though, that the two lefty talkers who were talking about it were saying it was undignified, then snickering like little children about it.

    Bush had far more class than the worst of the deranged, vicious people who have been attacking him.

    At least in the next few days we may observe an end to this as well as the most stupid, cultish, "event-driven" Obama-worship that's the worst of the idiotic manic behavior he has spawned among so much of the Herd.
  • Bush had far more class than the worst of the deranged, vicious people who have been attacking him.

    "Appearance" of class maybe, but not actual class. Like lipstick on a pig.

    If he had any real class, he would have apologized profusely to everyone, and promptly checked into The Hague.
  • splantyboy
    The treatment of Bush on his way out is indicative of the types of people who so fervently support the left...and who, with the help of a mainstream media contempt with reporting half truths, got a very left-leaning government elected. But for them it is not enough...now we must spit at him while he peacefully departs, steal a filibuster proof majority in the senate by conjuring up votes for a washed up comedian in MN. The Republicans NEVER had the kind of control the dems now have. For had they, Bush's initiatives to stop the financial meltdown in 2003 might have passed. But it was stonewalled by dems. The same dems that eliminated control of the repackaging of bad loans as investment vehicles back in the '90s. The same dems that practically coerced financial institutions into making loans to low income home owners (ie sub-prime loans), which precipitated the financial melt-down. And the same dems that swore Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were solvent as late as last July. What a joke. Those who have posted here do not seem to understand the facts...thanks in part to the media's lack of reporting. They also never bothered to focus on the humanitarian efforts of the now former president. Anyone here know about his aid to Africa? Again thanks to an “unbiased” media.
    So how did Bush violate your rights or disrespect you?...I see that quite a bit here...not only have you been free to express your opinions but Bush has really never defended himself against his detractors....and for that I blame him. He should have had a Carville like Billybob did.
    The legacy of Bush will not be summed up today. It will take a few years to grasp
    What I witnessed Monday was history. It is a great day when an American of African descent can become president. I can appreciate that as a conservative. I won’t shout that “he is not my president” for clearly he is and I do wish him the best of luck. Because, with the people we now have pulling the strings, he is going to need it.
  • splantyboy
    Wow! again to illustrate, these are the folks who got a left-wing govt elected.

    "Bush is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis." By this logic then (or lack there of) FDR was responsible for the deaths of millions of Germans and Japanese. It's like the people ignore the big white elephant in the room and focus on the carpet stain instead.

    "...large part to blame for the destruction of New Orleans"

    That is downright stupid. To summarize...a run down city controlled by a dem mayor in a corrupt state controlled by a dem governor choose not to prepare, in advance, their city (which is 20 ft below sea level 10 miles from the ocean in the middle of hurricane alley) from an approaching hurricane and it is Bush's fault??? Heck why not blame God for that matter? Bush offered assistance the night the hurricane struck and gov Blanco refused.

    "...despite the international scientific consensus on global warming"

    What concensus? There is not scientific concensus on Anthropogenic global warming. If fact more and more scientists (not environmentalists since they are not scientists) are comming out against it.

    "Then there is the issue of torture and warrantless surveillance, crimes which Bush should be put on trial for committing"

    Blah blah blah..I have heard this over and over like a broken record...what torture? (waterboarding is not torture...do you even know what it is?)

    If you think the last 8 years were devastating you had better put your seat belt on because a bad situation with mediocre leadership is rough. A bad situation with lousey leadership is far worse. Mark my words. The next decade will likely either see a depression and/or a major war that will make 4000 dead soldiers look like a picnic.
  • greenschemes
    The last 20 years our government has chosen to spend beyond its means. The feel good democrats will finish the job. this nation will be bankrupt in 4 years.
  • Bodhipaksa
    Yes, the heckling you describe is childish and rude. Perhaps when millions of people have lost jobs, houses, and health insurance they tend to resent their leaders, but still we should expect people to behave better.

    I believe Bush has actually had too much of a free ride, offered by you as well. You say we need to remember the "context" in which Bush governed. Rewind to day one and the context includes a budgetary surplus which he proceeded to squander. The context included outgoing security officials warning that Osama Bin Laden was the number one threat to the US - warnings he chose to ignore. The context included Bush being warned that OBL was "determined to strike within the US" and that he may fly planes into prominent buildings. Let's remember that, despite the boasts that he "kept America safe," Bush actually allowed 9/11 to happen. For some reason people are too polite or too unthinking to point this out. Bush created his own "context" which then becomes his excuse for a free ride.
  • SunflowerPipes
    This article reminds me that we have come so far in so little time. Obama is an inspiring leader and I was grateful to be present at his inauguration. I have seen a lot of comments stating that as Americans people should not have booed Bush. I think that they have forgotten what it means to be Americans. I practice dissent were I believe it is needed. There is no doubt that Bush has broken the law and betrayed the trust of the country on many occasions. Look no further than the justice department for evidence of this. I am enclosing a link to the footage I took of Bush being booed at Obama's innauguration. People look like they are just ready for Bush to go and I feel as they do. Bush Booed During Inauguration Link




    Cheers,
    Sunflower Pipes
  • rbchilds
    There is a time and place for such displays, the inauguration was not one of them. It was completely inappropriate behavior. Not a case of free speech or practicing dissent but a case of lack of common sense and bad manners. I didn't care for Bush's policies, the same that I didn't care for Clinton breaking the law, yes Clinton broke the law he committed perjury to a Federal Grand Jury. Liberals speak of Bush causing thousands of American Lives and even larger amounts of Iraqi lives, do they remember Vietnam. The Democrats premeditated a lie that killed 64000 american servicemen, untold numbers of south Vietnamese citizens, hundred of thousands of north vietnamese, untold numbers of viet cong. Then they had the audascity to have push for the early withdrawal, which caused even more South Vietnamese lives and MILLIONS of lives in Cambodia and Laos. I've been in the trenches and held an American solder bleeding to death, I've lived the results of a dysfuctional government. The differences are that Bush did what he believed was right for the country, which is what we as citizens elected him to do. In Vietnam the Democrats did it because of a premeditated lie. Bush received wrong intelligence, Johnson was duped by McNamara. Both made decisions based on the facts they had. No president believes that the people around him, would purposely mislead him. Did the liberals want to convict Johnson, McNamara or Truman. Yes Truman, he is the one that originally got us into Vietnam by financing the French. I pray that President Obama and the liberals don't prematurely leave Iraq and cause the aftermath we saw in SE Asia. I came home from SE Asia to liberals calling me a baby killer, spitting in my face, and permanent disgrace all because of war that liberals/Democrats started. The fact remains, there is a time and a place for this dialogue and the inauguration was not that place. On a day of such historic portions, these ugly americans raised their heads and disrespected all of America. I'm confident that their mothers didn't teach them this behavior. I was taught if you don't have something nice to say then keep your mouth shut, this was a time for that resolve. Anyone who thinks this was appropriate behavior, for an inauguration, should be taken behind the wood shed and have their rear tanned.
  • splantyboy
    rbchilds,

    Spoken like a true patriot! And you more than earned that right. There is a time and a place for debate. Inauguration day is not one of them. What I typically see in left wing activists are arrogant, ignorant, inexperienced youths filled with propoganda by their hippie throw back university professors, out spewing this garbage at the expense of their working mommies and daddies (probably hard working tax paying Republicans).

    God Bless my friend.
  • splantyboy
    ChrisWWW,

    So what is your point? If a few police officers run amok and cause problems we should prosecute the governor? Set your emotions aside for a moment and really think this one through.
  • splantyboy
    "Dare not to protest the decider, lest you be pronounced in league with the enemy..."

    Can you provide a date as to when this was uttered by the Bush administration? I bet not. He may have said something similar in regards to foreign countries that did not support the war on terror but that is a horse of a different color my friend. You, like most on this site, continue to perpetuate the urban legends, which ultimately serve no purpose, as history tries to put things in perspective. Shame on you!
  • splantyboy
    "There is no doubt that Bush has broken the law and betrayed the trust of the country on many occasions."

    What laws??? Here is your chance to practice some dissent.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC