An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Wall Street Journal/NBC News Poll: Americans Strongly Back Obama And His Stimulus Proposals

A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll finds that Americans strongly support President Elect Barack Obama — and that a whopping majority of Americans want Republicans to compromise rather than stand on principle and oppose his proposals…a number that includes a huge number of Republicans.

The percentage who approve the way he’s handling the transition: 71 percent — which indicates the bumps along the way have had virtually no impact on the perception of him and the support he enjoys across the nation.

Translated into cold, political terms, it means Obama is coming into office enjoying wide-ranging, bipartisan support and that GOPers who have given signs of getting ready to oppose him in Congress will be on shaky political ground, even within their own party’s rank and file if they stall or significantly dilute what he seeks:

Americans support the economic-stimulus plan being pushed by President-elect Barack Obama but worry the government will spend too much money and widen the budget deficit, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found.

Overall, the poll found strong public backing for the stimulus plan and its major planks, particularly proposals to spend more federal money to create jobs.

As Mr. Obama prepares to take office next week, he enjoys enormous good will and higher approval ratings than his predecessors enjoyed upon entering the White House.

The poll found that the handful of problems Mr. Obama’s transition has encountered have had little, if any, effect on his standing with the public. And even before the Illinois Democrat is sworn in as the nation’s first African-American president, the poll found a large increase in the number of Americans who view race relations positively.

According to the Wall Street Journal, most Americans remain gloomy — some would say “realistic” — about the prospect of 2009 as a year to end the recession. But otherwise the numbers show support for change:

Americans support the economic-stimulus plan being pushed by President-elect Barack Obama but worry the government will spend too much money and widen the budget deficit, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found.

Overall, the poll found strong public backing for the stimulus plan and its major planks, particularly proposals to spend more federal money to create jobs.

As Mr. Obama prepares to take office next week, he enjoys enormous good will and higher approval ratings than his predecessors enjoyed upon entering the White House.

The poll found that the handful of problems Mr. Obama’s transition has encountered have had little, if any, effect on his standing with the public. And even before the Illinois Democrat is sworn in as the nation’s first African-American president, the poll found a large increase in the number of Americans who view race relations positively.

…Less than a week before taking office, Mr. Obama himself also enjoys high ratings, with 71% approving of the way he is handling the transition.

Writes NBC’s Mark Murray:

Despite the Blagojevich mess, the ordeal over whether to seat Burris in the Senate, and Bill Richardson’s withdrawal as Commerce secretary, the American public continues to overwhelmingly approve of Obama’s transition, according to the latest NBC/WSJ poll.

This could prove less to be an indication that Obama will be a Teflon President then more a reaction to the tone of his transition: notably centrist and inclusive.

For instance, in the past 24 hours some progressives were upset because he dared to have dinner with conservative commentators. Was he getting ready to sell out? Does this mean he’d throw away all his campaign promises? But then it came out today that he has also met with liberal commentators.

In a sense, the practice of seriously reaching out that he’s showing in his transition goes back to Democratic and Republican presidents who sought to build a wide-ranging coalition to support their policies and to mend fences with their opponents so the debate was about policies and not over personalities and the whipping up of fury and passions. If a politician can build up a reservoir of good will, he or she is more likely to get the benefit of the doubt — and it looks like the public is giving Obama the benefit of the doubt over his transition-era toe stubs of his own and not his own making.

  • elrod
    Honestly, I didn't read many liberal bloggers upset over the dinner with conservatives. There was talk that liberals might end up worried. But I haven't seen any indication that they are.
  • DLS
    1. Those "conservatives" are DC establishment "conservatives" and there's no need to fear or loathe them, obviously.

    * * *

    2. I'd not be so hype-ridden about Obama but just rely on something like this, which is quite positive, which is understandable.

    http://people-press.org/report/483/confidence-i...


    3. Some on the Left are, as usual, ridiculous in their lack of realism. Michigan's governor here is notorious lately for this (the silliness about the industry-saving electric car and "green jobs" in the hundreds of thousands is sickening), as are the more stupid activists in this state (absolutely opposed to a new reactor at Fermi on "environmental" [sic] grounds; absolute opposition to _all_ new coal plants and wanting the state to be _forced_ to adopt alternative energy, which _will_ magically become practical and economical; how, they fail to explain).


    4. Loser-vote-buying populist schemes appealing to envy and other baser motives and instincts repel those of us brought up better, but there are economic grounds to be made for "bottom-loaded" economic policy decisions, as described here by Moody's. (States as well as the feds should take note, as Dems stand to buy votes everywhere as a result of such policies intended "temporarily" to combat the recession.)

    www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/assissing-...


    5. The anti-automobile, forced-public-collective-transport loonies won't like it (nor, say, the APTA unless public transit gets money thrown at it as well), but I thought of a classic loser-vote-buying move Obama could make that would improve the environment while helping our failed Detroit auto makers. In the past, it has been stated more than once that it would be cheaper to give new cars to people with older cars than to spend money on some environmental quality-related programs. Why doesn't Obama set up a "free car" or "car exchange" or "car buyback" [sic] program wherein people with older cars would receive in exchange a new car, ideally a GM, Ford, or Chrysler car, so as to help Detroit as well as improve air quality and buy votes? Start in the inner, old central cities and work outward beginning at the inner-ring suburbs, i.e., starting with traditional Dem voters and working outward into the suburbs where the Dems are fighting the GOP for nation-wide political supremacy. It improves air quality, with smaller vehicles reduces fuel consumption, buys votes, and (if all or at least half the vehicles are Detroit vehicles or purchased in bulk along with others for government use -- I already have discussed fleets for government as a Detroit sop) helps Detroit. Go ahead, Obama. Reward mainly Dem voters with new, "free" small Detroit cars.
  • casualobserver
    Americans support the economic-stimulus plan being pushed by President-elect Barack Obama but worry the government will spend too much money and widen the budget deficit, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found.

    Given the implied non-sequitur, those being polled must have an IQ of -5.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC