An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Senate Inches Toward Seating Illinois’ Burris: Obama’s Idea?

In what can only be described as a sort-of-slow-motion about face, the Senate is now showing signs that it’s going to seat Roland Burris to take over President Elect Barack Obama’s Senate spot after all.

And, according to one report, the suggestion (a political offer they couldn’t refuse?) came from the Obama team.

CBS reports:

Senate leaders began to clear the way for Roland Burris to take over President-elect Barack Obama’s vacant seat, saying they wanted the issue resolved quickly.

Burris met Wednesday with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Dick Durbin, a day after his paperwork was rejected at the opening of the 111th Congress.

They called the meeting ”positive” and indicated that the Senate would be open to seating Burris once legal hurdles are resolved and Burris clears the air over his appointment.

Senate officials in both parties, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly for Senate members, said there is a growing expectation on Capitol Hill that the saga will end with Burris being seated.

Senate officials say Burris’ appointment still has to be certified by Illinois’ secretary of state.

So the Senators just slept on it, met with Burris and decided they were initially wrong? Perhaps there was some of that. But The Huffington Post’s Sam Stein reports that idea may have come from a….higher source:

The apparent decision to seat Roland Burris came after aides to President-elect Barack Obama contacted senior Senate Democrats and suggested that they reverse course and accept Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s controversial appointment, according to a senior Dem congressional aide.

Just minutes after the decision to seat Burris was reported, Obama offered the veteran Illinois pol praise and promised a working relationship.

“That is a Senate matter,” he said of the news. “But I know Roland Burris, obviously he is from my home state. He is a fine public servant, if he gets seated then I am going to work with Roland Burris like all other senators to make sure that the people if Illinois and the people across the country are served.”

Confusion remains as to what will happen with Burris. While reports signaled his imminent seating, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said the AP report was “wrong,” and that “there have been no decisions.”

Two impressions from this:

(1) The Obama folks have faced some prickly political issues, some of their own (inexperienced) making and some not.

(2) They do seem to be showing a strength on several fronts on damage control — whether it’s letting associates under a cloud exit quickly, soothing irked feelings (California Senator Dianne Feinstein, who almost sounded like former House Speaker Newt Gingrich complaining about Clinton not inviting him to an elite seat on the airplane when she complained about not hearing in advance about Obama CIA pick Leon Panetta) via phone calls, or trying to defuse escalating political dramas. Are we truly entering an era of consultation and negotiation versus political confrontation and escalation?

  • AustinRoth
    Well, I am no fan of Senator Feinstein, but not informing, if not providing a 'window dressing' consultation, to the head of the Intelligence Committee, and a senior member of you own party, is more than bad form.
  • casualobserver
    The apparent decision to seat Roland Burris came after aides to President-elect Barack Obama contacted senior Senate Democrats and suggested that they reverse course and accept Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s controversial appointment, according to a senior Dem congressional aide.

    Sounds like another Imperial Presidency in the making.............
  • JWeidner
    Joe, you forgot a third impression...

    Harry Reid is an incompetent boob.
  • Well, I am no fan of Senator Feinstein, but not informing, if not providing a 'window dressing' consultation, to the head of the Intelligence Committee, and a senior member of you own party, is more than bad form.

    AR,
    Perhaps Obama took her at her word when she told people not to question the President's prerogative in picking the CIA chief. She of course said this while Bush was prez.
  • AustinRoth
    Chris - of course it is his prerogative, as with all Cabinet choices, and Supreme Court nominations and the like. But silly me, I remember a lot of strum und drang from the Left when Bush did not properly consult (in their view) with Congress about said appointments.

    Perhaps my memory fails me. Or perhaps any criticism of Saint Obama is heresy.

    But either way, professional and political courtesy would have at least had Obama informing Feinstein of his choice, rather than finding out through the press.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC