An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Gaza and Tehran’s Game of Three-Pocket Billiards: Le Figaro, France

So what or who is really behind the escalation in Gaza? According to French Historian Alexandre Adler, the answer to that question couldn’t be more clear: Iran. And to be more specific – Iranian President Ahmahdinejad, who is fighting a rear-guard action against many people in his own government who desire an accommodation with the United States.

But what is his game, exactly? Ahmahdinejad is fashioning a foreign threat before elections in the spring to save his political neck.

For France’s Le Figaro, Alexandre Adler writes in part:

“By precipitating such a fight, the fundamentalists are taking a huge risk, but they also hope to win big.

The sacrifice by the Islamists of Gaza are meant, in the spirit their instigators, both to beat the Shiites in Tehran and Baghdad – who dream only of a dialogue with Obama and, once and for all, destabilize an increasingly fundamentalist Egypt.

Mubarak’s powerlessness could definitively weaken his state and make the entire region shift toward a sort of caliphate.”

The Chronicle of Alexandre Adler

Translated By Kate Davis

December 26, 2008

France – Le Figaro – Original Article (French)

The sounds of Israeli mobilization and the organization of retaliation in Gaza shouldn’t obscure the reality of the decisive confrontation playing out before our eyes, which is none other than the fate of Iran, the true key to the entire future of the Middle East.

Looking closely at what’s happening, one is struck by the fact that Tehran’s policy has just achieved, over recent weeks, the culmination of inconsistency.

Having arrived at this point, Iran needed to evolve in one way or another – toward cooperation with the United States in Iraq or armed conflict with Israel. This choice seems a necessary one before general elections are held in spring 2009. It seems that President Ahmahdinejad has decided before this domestic deadline to take deliberate steps toward organizing a vast external provocation.

  • Silhouette
    Wow! Nice spin!

    That terrible (latest) bad guy nationalist Ahmahdinejad daring to have sovereignty with his country and keep US interests out of it! We should invade! We should attack!

    No, that would seem to overt in the wake of the same exact thing we just did in Iraq.

    Hmmm....what to do.....

    Hey! I know... Let's get our buddies the Israelis to do what they always do: invade Palestine, piss off the Iranian "latest bad guy" and get him to make an aggressive move in defense of his region. Then the US will 'have' to invade Iran...because we won't have appeared to have been involved with poor innocent attacking Israel, (but we'll sure come out behind the smokescreen when Iran steps in ; ) )

    I wonder how people live through this stuff, see it over and over and over like with Vietnam, Iraq and now Iran...and just trust trust trust that US powers-that-be are acting altruistically.

    I'll admit, religion makes a fine cover for economic takeovers, but enough is enough. This is getting ridiculous. Can we ever feel proud of being Americans? Will they ever let us?
  • Silhouette
    OK, I'm just going to say it. It's about time someone did..

    Israel= American's (BigOil) toe-in-the-door controlling foreign oil reserves for profit...ultimately...

    Religious matters are a convenient distraction and excuse for atrocities in the name of money.

    I like jews, have jewish ancestors myself and in fact have toyed around with becoming jewish as I like many of their customs; particularly family orientation..

    But...this fixation with Israel has become something of a mental epidemic. And, as I said, a convenient smokescreen.

    I have ties to Germany...deep and important, meaningful ties where relics of my forefathers lie and lands that have significance to molding meaning in my life. But you don't see me invading Germany and setting up a religious state based on my fixation of "holy relics and places" I feel entitled by birth to have a right to control and worship at?

    Literally, they're (overtly) fighting over piles of sand and rubble where some ancient important people happened to have lived and did some important things once and calling it "religious manifest destiny"..when in fact it is patently absurd.

    The zealots fight over piles of sand and rubble "relics" that have no more importance to a sublime and unfathomable God than matters of substance: like the Ten Commandments of The Old Testament (the hebrew Bible: most of the Commandments the jews are currently breaking by invading Palestine)...but Oh! Protect the idealism of those piles of rubble! The Wailing Wall!... while their allies, the US BigOil corporations fight over what lies underneath that rubble: The largest oil reserves. They both use each other as an excuse to carry on atrocities that would otherwise be condemned if the wool was pulled away and the dysfunction revealed.

    Fixation and greed. Both of which are unforgivable sins in the eyes of Yaweh. Does Hell ring a bell?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC