An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

CNN Poll: 75% Can’t Wait To See Bush Go

ren_n_stimpy.gif

As the (second) Bush era draws to a close, what do Americans feel as GWB packs up his things and gets ready to head back to Texas? According to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll, 75 percent of Americans can’t wait to see him go. Some 23 percent (which most assuredly includes Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity) are going to miss him. It’s worth taking an extended look at this story:

A new national poll suggests that three out of four Americans feel President Bush’s departure from office is coming not a moment too soon.

Seventy-five percent of those questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released Friday said they’re glad Bush is going; 23 percent indicated they’ll miss him.

“Earlier this year, Bush scored some of the lowest presidential approval ratings we’ve seen in half a century, so it’s understandable that the public is eager for a new president to step in,” said Keating Holland, CNN polling director.

CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider added, “As President Bush prepares to leave office, the American public has a parting thought: Good riddance. At least that’s the way three-quarters feel.”


But is this a bum rap?
Didn’t former Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton leave office with the bulk of Americans counting off the days, hours and seconds when they’d finally be totally bye-bye? NO:

The portion who say they won’t miss Bush is 24 percentage points higher than the 51 percent who said they wouldn’t miss President Bill Clinton when he left office in January 2001. Forty-five percent of those questioned at that time said they would miss Clinton.

The poll indicates that Bush compares poorly with his presidential predecessors, with 28 percent saying that he’s the worst ever. Forty percent rate Bush’s presidency as poor, and 31 percent say he’s been a good president.

Fair enough…But when Bush is out of the White House, won’t Americans be yearning for him to rise from the political ashes like former President Jimmy Carter and be in the media spotlight again?

And, again the answer is NO:

Only a third of those polled said they want Bush to remain active in public life after he leaves the White House. That 33 percent figure is 22 points lower than those in 2001 who wanted Bill Clinton to retain a public role.

“It’s been like a failed marriage,” Schneider said.

The poll found that most Americans feel Bush was not cracked up to what he suggested his was, his partisans insisted he was and what some of them felt he had to be. In taking office in 2001 and 2004 he had decent numbers. But now?

*The poll finds that most Americans now feel he proved to be a divider, not a uniter. “When running for the White House in the 2000 presidential campaign, Bush promised to be a uniter and not a divider. But 82 percent of poll respondents felt that Bush did not unite the country, compared with 17 percent who said he did.

*He no longer inspires confidence. In 2001 and 2004 some 60 percent felt he inspired confidence and that number is now down to 20.

*He has a record 27 percent low approval rating with 72 percent disapproving of the way he does his job:

“President Bush’s job approval rating has been at or below freezing since the beginning of the year,” Schneider said. “The current 27 percent approval rating is one of the lowest ratings for any president, ever.”

We don’t usually “vet” such polls so extensively here, but it is instructive for several reasons:

1. The GOP will have to move beyond the Bush era and re-stamp its brand name. Jeb Bush in 2012 would not be a wise party career move.

2. Barack Obama comes to office with record high transition approval ratings and this poll clearly showing Americans want to put an era behind them marked by unwise or poorly executed policies and political polarization. He has a substantial opportunity — coming into office with so many Americans ready to give him the benefit of the doubt and wanting to forget about the Bush era, which Schneider has noted on CNN started its major downturn after the administration’s Hurricane Katrina fiasco.

3. The high approval ratings for Obama and low ones for Bush in essence mean that there is a consensus now in the United States. Bush won in 2001 in a hotly contested and controversial election. The 911 carnage created a consensus, which he and Karl Rove squandered at the altar of partisan politics. Will Obama build on the consensus he now has, try to maintain it or, like Bush, overstep and morph into yet one more politician whose key interest seems to be advancing a D or an R rather than uniting the country and aggregating interests?

  • Manchester2
    As one who voted for GWB, twice, here's a case for what he did well:

    1. The United States was spared from another major attack. Many will question whether this was because of or despite the so-called Global War on Terror. Still, assuming no other attacks on our soil in the next three weeks, the President can leave knowing he did his best to protect the nation from a clear and present danger.

    2. Bush protected the unborn. From putting the Mexico City policy back in place, to Congress outlawing partial birth abortion, to strict rules governing stem-cell research, President Bush carefully researched the issue and stood by his guns once an informed decision was made. Particularly on the issue of stem cells, this gave room for researchers to develop alternative methods that do not involve the destruction of nascent human life.

    3. Bush looked after Africa. On a continent that rarely gets a mention in the U.S media, the Bush administration was active. Mrs. Bush raised money for anti-malarial mosquito netting that will save countless lives. The PEPFAR program injected billions into the fight against AIDS-HIV, and is having an enduring impact.

    4. No child left behind bucked the conservatives in his own party and put into place an apparatus for measuring educational achievement in our public schools. It needs some changes, but don't all prototypes?

    5. Faith based initiatives were recognized as being an important part of the "safety net" for the down-and-out in our society. The "separation of church and state" mantra that so often discriminated against deserving social programs did not prevent President Bush from pushing ahead despite entrenched opposition.

    Regarding Bush 43, the media is indulging in a lot of "worst President" stories. History, on these considerations and more, will be much kinder to George W. Bush.
  • kritt11
    Sorry,Manchester,

    but people are remembering that while he may have looked after poverty-stricken Africa, his policies and lack of regulation of the mortgage industry and Wall Street bankers plunged many in his OWN country into poverty.

    They are remembering that the money -- more than a trillion- that was spent on the Iraq War and for Blackwater-- will never be recovered and that that money could have put an entire generation through a four year college.

    They are remembering that he rushed up to Ground Zero for a photo op, and vowed to get the guy who planned it all. That guy is still at large plotting against us.

    They are remembering that he rushed back to the capital because Terry Schiavo's husband wanted to disconnect her life support, but remained at the ranch-- oblivious when Katrina hit, and that he later congratulated the head of FEMA for "a heckuva job".

    They are remembering that his VP purposely outed the CIA agent who was in charge of a covert mission that uncovered nuclear proliferation in Iran-- because he was angry at what her husband wrote in the NYT's.

    They remember that he censored his own scientists on the subject of Global Warming in order to please RNC Big Donors.

    People remember that more than 4,000 Americans and countless Iraqis lie dead in a war of choice-- that his administration arrogantly and mistakenly tried to tie in to 9/11.

    They remember that Bush's Treasury Secretary was quick to bail out Wall Street financiers but much slower to aid the Big Three --- and save the jobs of union workers.

    They will remember the politicization of the Justice Dept during the Bush years-- that civil service jobs went improperly to conservative Republicans and were denied to liberals. That Democrats were prosecuted by the dept in order to influence election results- and that those who refused to take part were summarily dismissed.

    They'll remember the humiliating abuses at Abu Ghraib and Gitmo, and the corresponding lowering of the status of US prestige in the world.

    They'll look at how Americans were lied to , time and time again about the reasons we went into Iraq and later the status of our progress there.

    Or, perhaps they'll look at the massive surplus that Bush turned into a massive deficit, that he is leaving for the next generation to shoulder, and wonder about what could have been if the Supreme Court had gone the other way in 2000.

    But mostly they'll remember that a Bush administration attorney John Yoo defined torture as procedure(s) that lead to organ failure and death. Waterboarding did not meet the new redefinition.

    I think Laura Bush would have made a better president.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Well said, Krit11!
  • kritt11
    Thanks, D. E.!

    It may not help the historical record but I just had to say it!
  • doctorj2u
    I have only one word to say -Katrina.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC