An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Bush’s $17.4 Billion Auto Bailout Softens His Negative Legacy

Yesterday’s news cycle was dominated by reports from the White House that President George W. Bush was floating the idea of a government-managed bankruptcy of the ailing Big 3 American automakers.

Today, Bush un-floated it and instead offered a $17.4 billion loan bailout to the Big Three automakers. Stocks immediately began to rise on Wall Street — something that would most assuredly not have happened if Bush had announced a thumbs-down on a bailout.

It’s clear that that yesterday’s suggestion by Bush and other White House officials about a possible bankruptcy meant it was on the table — and that it didn’t look good because it clashed with the financial recovery plan tablecloth. Bush’s decision is HIGHLY significant to him, the country, the economy and the international economic scene:

1. It buys time for the industry and the incoming Obama administration. It avoided a new economic body-blow hitting the country right around Christmas and before Barack Obama is sworn in as President.

2. It will help at least the avoidance of more damage to the American auto industry going into 2009. Yesterday’s White House feelers about a possible managed bankruptcy sparked broadcast news reports quoting experts who said if a car company was in bankruptcy it would likely never survive since a large chunk of customers wouldn’t buy from a company if they felt their vehicles could have far less or no value upon resale…which is what happens to many vehicles made by companies that went under.

3. It will help add a positive note to the legacy of Bush who, at best, will be considered a highly-flawed President and, at worst, rank as one of the worst in American history. The Republicans in the Senate, acting on ideology, regional politics and anti-union sentiment, had scuttled the bailout — giving the GOP an image once again of a party stuck on ideology.

4. It means if the auto industry does go under, it can’t be said that George Bush fired the final shot in its head. Now, if it goes under, it’ll likely be under the Obama administration (Happy New Year Barack…).

5. It further puts Bush at odds with many conservatives in his own party who grumbled about bailing out banks and insurance companies but did so quickly but balked when it came to automakers becaus,e in at least some cases, they wanted to short-circuit the UAW. It also puts him at odds with many conservative radio talk show hosts.

6. It will likely send a signal (even if fleeting) to international markets that both the existing and incoming administrations are at least partially on the same wavelength in ensuring the United States has proactive policies to stem financial bleeding.

None of this means the American auto industry will be around in two years or in the same form. But it avoids yet another punch to the reeling economy’s gut and helps Bush go out on a note suggesting he agonized over this decision and looked at all angles.

Here’s Bush’s announcement this morning:


UPDATE I: For more blog reaction GO HERE.

UPDATE 2 AND CORRECTION:
For some reason, the following link and update vanished from this site even though it had been posted earlier. For an opposing view of this bailout and other viewpoints that do not agree with this post GO HERE.

  • Silhouette
    Bush doing something smart/compassionate on the eve of his and Cheney's likely indictments for the atrocities of their administration is like a serial killer sending roses to the victims' families on the eve of his trial.

    I consider it a slap in the face. In no way shape or form will I allow neither BigOil, via "sudden" dropping fuel prices, to buy out my justified anger at duping us into their Iraq oil takeover, nor Bushco to buy out my justified anger at their wilfull deception and conspiracy to ruin our country, with last-minute "roses" as they fear for their very necks in impending legal action.

    Screw that. Fry 'em. It's Nuremberg all over again and we have some criminals to prosecute before the aghast and onlooking world...

    They have consistently behaved in an un-American fashion and it's time to make an example out of these traitors and restore our global reputation as reasonable and trustworthy people..

    "Last-minute roses" aren't going to cut it. Jail time and fines...now you're talking...
  • jchem
    You know, it kind of makes me wonder why the House and the Senate even bothered debating this issue at all. Bush did this even though it was rejected by the senate. Couldn't that time have been used for something productive if this was going to happen anyway? All that talk about how the economy is in the toilet, millions of jobs being at stake, unemployment rising, economic armageddon, etc, etc, yet somehow these clowns think a raise is in order.

    http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/with-econom...

    Bush may well go down as the worst president we've ever had, but this congress isn't that far behind him.
  • superdestroyer
    Once again Bush demonstrates that he is an idiot. All this bailout does is postpone the ineviatible. GM and Chryler are unsustainable as business in a country run by lawyers, activist, and community organizers. Given new energy and environmental regulations, it is doubtful that any manufacturer can exist in the U.S.

    GM has over $100 billion in debt. How is adding to that debt going to fix the problem? It wont but Bush's stupidty will give Obama excuses are the future failures of all heavy industry in the U.S.
  • Silhouette
    GM sabotaged its own R&D of fuel-efficient cars in cahoots with BigOil to keep Americans hobbled and dependant on gas guzzlers and their money flowing into BigOil execs' pockets. Now we're supposed to step up and bail out GM?

    Where the hell is BigOil's money? Why don't they bail out GM? Hey BigOil, YOU loan the automakers the money. No, you wouldn't dare invest in fuel efficient car manufacturing to keep america competitive....that would mean less profits for you.

    Unless Congress makes it mandatory for you to $tep in and help out. Well, Congress? Time to show what you're made of. And I hope it's not all bribes and abetting.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC