An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama’s Change Is Changing (Guest Voice)

{59863A0B-8EB3-4770-8B01-7A35855FF007}_1.gif

Progressives have noticed that President Elect Barack Obama has been giving signs his Presidency will likely be a centrist presidency. In this Guest Voice, conservative talk show host Michael Reagan, the son of former President Ronald Reagan, makes it clear he notices a move towards the center as well. Guest Voice posts do not necessarily represent the opinion of TMV or its writers.

Change is Changing

by Michael Reagan

A funny thing happened on his way to the White House: that old, left-wing community organizer Barack Obama has suddenly veered toward the center, and his incoming administration is looking more and more like the Daley Machine in Chicago than Hugo Chavez’s administration down in Venezuela.

It seems that reality has set in, instructing the soon-to-be president-elect (he won’t be that until the presidential electors gather and vote for him next month) that it’s easier to promise change then it is to change the way things are traditionally done in a democracy.

Watching him announce key appointments to cabinet and sub-cabinet posts makes one think that this is Bill Clinton redux. Mr. Obama has dug deep into the 1990s and resurrected much of the Clinton cast of characters, even to naming Hillary Clinton to be secretary of state.

That appointment, some have suggested, is Obama’s way of emulating Lyndon Johnson. When LBJ named an old foe to a post in his administration, he explained that it was better to have the camel inside the tent urinating out, than outside the tent urinating in.

None of this satisfies the radical left that went bonkers trying to elect the man they thought would turn the White House into a new Kremlin and name all of them commissars of the new Socialist Republic of America.

Barack Obama, ardent disciple of the late Saul Alinsky, seems to have forgotten the iron-clad left-wing dictate — “no enemies to the left.” With every Clintonite or Wall Streeter appointment he makes a new enemy on the left.

What the Alinsky/Ayers crowd doesn’t seem to understand is that Barack Obama’s only acquaintanceship with government in action was his close relationship with Chicago’s Daley machine, where its hallmark — aside from its rampant corruption — was devotion to pragmatism. If it works, do it; if it doesn’t, don’t.

Everything Mr. Obama has done in recent weeks since winning the election has been an exercise in pragmatism — gone is all the heated rhetoric about change and reform. Everything is now measured by only one standard — it must above all be practical.

What his disappointed leftist allies don’t grasp is that many of those who voted for him thought he had a conservative message for them. Now with his appointments such as keeping Robert Gates at the Defense Department and naming Paul Volcker as a top economic advisor, he’s delivering on what the voters saw as his conservative promises.

Unlike Bill Clinton, he’s moving to the center before he takes office, and not two years afterwards as Clinton did. During the campaign I prayed he was lying when he unveiled his platform and promises of what he’d do as president.

I was hoping he lied about taxes. I was hoping he lied about ending the war in Iraq in 16 months. I was hoping he lied about all of those nutty left-wing programs he was promising.

It looks as if my prayers were answered.

I expect that he’ll try to mollify his now-dejected left-wing supporters by tossing them a few bones. He’ll push for the horrendous “Freedom of Choice” bill that would enshrine abortion as the supreme law of the land, overturning all restrictions on the grisly procedure previously enacted by the states; and trying to gag conservative talk radio hosts, for example.

I’m sure he knows that those attempts might be empty gestures if his party falls short of the 60 votes in the Senate they need to shut off debate on such measures, thereby allowing the Republican minority to use the filibusters to kill such measures so dear to the hearts of the so-called progressives.

What’s happening is Obama’s discovery that there is a big difference between running for president and being president. He is now up to date, up to speed, and getting all the information George Bush is getting — and he having to make decisions based on that information.

As a result he and George Bush are now on the same wavelength. It’s amazing what a little dose of reality will do to a man who dreamt dreams before he encountered the inescapable facts of life.

Welcome to Washington, Barack Obama

©2008 Mike Reagan. Mike’s column is distributed exclusively by: Cagle Cartoons, Inc.

Cartoon by Mike Keefe, The Denver Post

  • dmf
    nonsense.
  • kritt11
    MR-

    The difference between W and Obama is a few million brain cells, and the ability to process information that he is privy to, lol. 43's legacy will probably be his legendary ability to lose interest in the nuts and bolts of political policy. Also, unlike Bush, Obama is concerned with the welfare of all Americans and not just big donors and card-carrying Republicans.


    Since Bush led by a style that did NOT lean towards the middle- he consistently pandered to the right, and promoted its ideology at every opportunity, I am grateful to have a leader who understands that most of the country is center-left.
  • I'm a conservative leaning independent, but even I can see how this column is completely bogus. And it's not just this column. I've heard/read it many other places since the election. The argument goes something like this.

    1) We (the right-wing talking heads) said Obama is a socialist.
    2) Since now he seems not to be a socialist, he has flip-flopped, or "seen the light", or "encountered the inescapable facts of life".

    The other, more logical conclusion, is that #1 was entirely wrong. Obama promised all along that he would govern from the center, and be the "uniter", etc. Some, including me, had doubts about that given the people supporting him and his record, but I'll be perfectly happy if I turn out to be wrong, and I'll give him credit for keeping his word.

    Besides, I think the hype about him moving the center is a bit overblown and premature. There is at least one issue where he seems to have moved to the left, if you ask me.
  • plattstp
    him like all other poloticians lie to get in office and steal to stay there
  • DLS
    The original core supporters haven't been angry radicals, but naive, starry-eyed kids (of all ages).

    That he's avoiding the fringe for more substantial team members is not really a surprise. What will be interesting is if the team changes complexion, from less to more fringist (the opposite of Bill Clinton's second versus first term) if the economy manages to improve and the Obama team can bring aboard more activist liberals to try to make "progress" toward goals they've long cherished and wanted to pursue. Right now, even if Obama was not merely a Chavez, but a Castro or an Allende, there's no way he could nationalize everything, force everyone to think in a different, more "enlightened" way, and transform the nation and the world in three to seven days if not fewer. The economy won't permit it (nor will our current commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan, nor will terrorists, Russia, Iran, et cetera.)
  • goldenchild
    This article is complete nonsense. Obama is and remains progressive, change oriented and trustworthy. He is building an administration that he thinks will serve the people of America best which should be the focal point, so if that means working alongside Republicans and former Clinton staff, so be it. The problem is that you think because of his decisions of late for his cabinet that his supporters will now become his "enemies on the left", nonsense!!! We will continue to trust in his decisions and support him. We don't "desert" just because he doesn't do what we want him to do. He will be our president and guess what "Yours Too". It seems like "some people" are just waiting on the sidelines to criticize him, remember that if he fails, so do you-he represents your country. Get on board-We would welcome you-from the far left
  • DLS
    You have to wait until the economy is back in order and you have fewer constraints on which to spend federal money on preferred objects. Then the fun can begin in earnest. Will it or won't it involve a wait of two to four years (or more), that is on many of our minds.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC