An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

There Will Be Some O’s Missing In The White House When The Bushies Leave

In my hometown newspaper this morning, a letter writer debunked the myth that President Clinton’s staff “vandalized” the executive offices and the White House, before Bush staffers moved in, including the allegation that many computer keyboards were missing the W key—as in President Bush’s middle initial. It turned out that the “vandalism” reports were false or grossly exaggerated.

In May 2001, it was revealed, and reported in Salon and other media, that a formal review by the General Accounting Office, Congress’ investigative agency, “had found no damage to the offices of the White House’s East or West Wings or Executive Office Building” and that Bush’s own representatives had reported “there is no record of damage that may have been deliberately caused by the employees of the Clinton administration.”

The question now arises whether the Bush crowd will play pranks similar to those that were wrongly attributed to the Clinton staff, on the incoming Obama team.

In, “Oval Office Handover Spats, Grudges & the Occasional Pleasantry,” ABC’s John Cochran assures us:

Now, as “W” himself prepares to leave, his staff has been told: no pranks and no damaging of equipment before Obama’s people take over. Which means, I suppose, that the letter “O” will remain safe and secure on White House keyboards.

That may very well be so.

No O’s may be missing from White House keyboards on January 21, 2009.

But, when Obama and his team move into the White House and the Executive Buildings, they are likely to find that various other “O’s” are missing, and have gone missing for the entire eight years of the Bush administration.

Some of the missing “O’s” are, for example, the “O” in Open-mindedness and Objectivism; the “O” for the Oversight that went missing when executive agencies, staffs and individuals rode roughshod over other branches of government and over ordinary Americans; and, certainly, the “O” in the Outrage that has been missing when Americans’ constitutional rights, trust, and values were so frequently violated or ignored.

And, if you allow me to consider the “silent h,” perhaps the most important “O” that has been missing in the Bush administration is the “O” in hOnesty.

It will, no doubt, take a long time to reinstate these missing O’s, but the incoming “O” administration, I know, will work very hard at it.

  • Potfry
    When this idea dawned on you, this clever little "O" thing you've stumbled upon, wasn't there a quiet little voice in your head that said, "Wow, that's pretty lame, man. Don't go there."

    I really had to read it a couple of times to make sure you actually wrote that. I think I keep hoping it might go away.

    Look, we all have bad days. That delete button is in the top right corner.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Potfry:

    Did you wish I had used the "delete" button because the post is in fact "pretty lame," (I can take that) or because you did not like reading the truth?
  • EEllis
    truth? Come on man it's a opinion piece. And yes it's lame even if you take it as fact.
  • SteveK
    It appears that Dorian (and TMV in general) has been invaded by the 'sore loser' faction of the radical right.

    Had Potfry or EEllis actually commented on any of the points Dorian made (W's lack of Open-mindedness; Objectivism; and, Oversight) they could have presented a conversation / debate / disagreement but both seem unable.

    The truth (shown to all over these last eight years) is that George W. Bush failed or was lacking in all three areas... And all the '18 percenters' have left is bad manners and anger.
  • EEllis
    No anger just tired of bad writing. There is nothing to debate because it's the same tired rehash started with a weak premise. When called on it the fall back is that we "did not like reading the truth". Wow inspired writing. He asked if the post was lame so I told him. If he hadn't I would of left it alone. If he wanted to do a round up of Bush and start a real debate that would of been great. He didn't do that. He punctured an urban legend, informed us that Bush wouldn't allow anything similar to happen, and then tried to make a real awkward segway into a slam at Bush. It was awkward and would of been much better as two separate posts. Not everything is about partisanship.
  • superdestroyer
    I guess he can expect more of the backside kissing posts in the next few months. It is hard to believe that Democrats really believe in oversight when they elect someone who is part of the Chicago Machine and when the Democratic party lead Congress has not really been able to pass a budget for the last two years. When Congress has spent more time having hearings on steroid use in Baseball than on immigration reform or wall street bailouts, it is hard to believe that Congress is even capable of oversight.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Thanks for your objective review, EEllis. As I said, I can take it.
  • EEllis
    Thanks D.E. As I said it was an interesting bit of history I just think it was to much of a stretch as a transition into the Bush bash. I do understand the conflict with the current administration but when you are not on that bandwagon the acrobatics taken slam Bush just gets tired.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC