An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Politics of Wardrobe Costs

By now everybody has probably heard the story about the RNC spending $150,000 on Sarah Palin’s clothing and makeup. I mentioned this story to my wife this morning and, while she detests Sarah Palin, she came to her defense on this. Clothing (and hair and makeup) just cost a LOT more for women than for men. Anybody who reads the regular fashion and Hollywood journals knows that designer outfits run in the thousands. And Sarah Palin HAS to look good every day. Everybody is watching her.

I got the point and figured it was just a silly media over-reaction.

But then I remembered the mockery of John Edwards and his $400 haircut and how this stuff really does matter to the electorate for whatever reason. I think there are three reasons why this is bad for Palin.

1. Her image is the “regular hockey mom” and not the Hollywood glamor queen. She would actually bolster her image by shopping at TJ Maxx or even Wal-Mart than by going to Neiman Marcus or Saks. This is politics, not fashion. And she can make a great populist statement about dressing like ordinary women. She did, after all, make a very big deal about firing the chef in the governor’s mansion. Surely she could cut some costs on wardrobe expenses as a sign of identification with her conservative populist supporters. John Edwards was similarly mocked for speaking up for the common man while getting an expensive salon experience.

2. In these tough times nobody wants to hear about massive expenditures on clothing and makeup. It sends a terrible message to struggling families: you don’t make a third of Palin’s monthly wardrobe. Again, it’s tone-deaf.

3. The media LOVES idiotic stories like this. It shows poor decision-making by the RNC, Palin’s image as fraudulent, and sets her up for more SNL-style mockery.

As I recount these things, I can’t help but echo Jed’s point that this is the point when people start to talk of McCain’s campaign in the past tense. Republican officials are reportedly furious with the RNC over this. They usually capitalize on this sort of thing from the other side.

Perhaps most troubling to McCain is that this costs him another news cycle. With Colin Powell, the $150,000,000 fundraising for Obama, the massive Missouri rallies and now this, McCain has been pushed off message again. No longer are we talking about Joe the Plumber or taking seriously the charge that Obama is a “socialist.” And if the polls continue to move in Obama’s direction – which they have for the last couple days after a slight tightening last week – this election will be in the past tense sooner rather than later.

  • mlhradio
    The other counter-point to make over this six-figure extravagance is to point to Michelle Obama, and the dress everyone was talking about this summer:

    http://blogs.trb.com/entertainment/celebrities_...

    That little number that sent everyone rushing to the stores cost only $148.

    I fully understand that makeup and clothing is expensive - but if Palin is trying to run a campaign as an "everywoman", this does not play well with Joe and Joann Six-Pack who are scraping by on $25,000 a year in Indiana or Pennsylvania, keeping an eye on those $8.88 price-busters at Wal-Mart.
  • jchem
    But didn't she buy some diapers at a Wal Mart last week?

    I don't care what people wear, or how much their haircut cost them. But it seems like the same people who made such a fuss over Edwards' $400 grooming are now bitten by the same arguments they made against him. Perhaps they are getting what comes to them. But I find it a bit ironic that many who didn't think much of it with Edwards are now making it a pretty big issue with Palin. Its another role reversal just like the whole Joe the Plumber/Grame Frost issue turned out to be. If an issue such as this really affects how people will vote, then we are in some serious trouble.

    On a side note, I can only imagine what the "fashion experts" would be saying if Palin ran around on the campaign trail looking less than stately.
  • Hisui
    Reading some of the comments where people recognized what she was wearing, I wonder if the RNC could have gone about this in a much better fashion. Rather then buying the clothes and simply auctioning them off later (likely to people who will spend more, as someone pointed out in a previous thread) they should have treated it much like a movie set. Ask (new?) American designers to basically loan the clothing to her. It would be largely advertised on Palin as a way to pay for it. Then, hold an auction for them, but restrict it to small businesses or women who wear suits often, but can't afford to buy many.
    Now that would have been a plan.
  • DLS
    The overreaction to this is laughable. (Is Palin going to use Nancy Reagan's fine china or does she shop at the same shoe stores as Imelda Marcos?) This was poor PR and a country-club-plus-GOP "gimme" for libs and Dems, but some long-overdue maturity from the latter would be refreshing. [sigh]
  • pacatrue
    As I said in another comment chain, I believe this is primarily between the donors to the campaign and the campaign itself. The die-hards will keep giving money no matter what. But will some McCain-leaning donors decide not to click the donate button, thinking their $50 is just going to go to 1/3 of Palin's daily haircut?
  • Davebo
    Clothing (and hair and makeup) just cost a LOT more for women than for men.


    Perhaps if you buy your suits at Jos. A. Bank. But I've got at least one suit in my closet that cost more than twice what I paid for my first car.

    But in fairness, I'll probably use it for at least 10 years.
  • pacatrue
    Hee-hee. I always thought of Jos. A. Bank as a very expensive store. My one suit is from Mens' Warehouse.
  • Denverdan33
    If the RNC can buy Govener Palin a $1,000 dress at Needless Mark Up then perhaps they should also pay for Tine Fey's wardrobe as well.Just where is that money from the RNC comming from anyway?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC