An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Why McCain Will Win

Yes, I know, that’s probably a surprising headline, but if you give me a chance to explain myself we may have a new point of discussion. Earlier I talked about how the McCain campaign’s choice to bring up Bill Ayers would not be a wise decision. I stand by that analysis. The media is going to address the question of why McCain is talking about it more than the relationship itself. There is also a common narrative being woven that the worse the economy does, the better it is for Obama. Polls would indicate that there is some truth to that as well. But beyond all of the excitement and bloviation, I believe that the history of American politics has a more consistent lesson for us.

The country is in trouble right now – on a number of fronts – and people are frightened. Rightly so, I say. Not only is our economy on the rocks, but international news presents a host of goblins we may need to confront in the years to come. You certainly don’t need me to list them for you. And when the country is in trouble, voters turn to what they know and trust from the past. Certainly John McCain has some exposed flanks on past issues, but the fact remains that he is the face of what we’ve known and trusted for generations. He’s the war hero and the experienced Congressional leader who has walked the admittedly grimy halls of Washington for decades. He knows his way around the place and has seen administrations – both good and bad – pass in his wake.

Obama raised expectations of excited voters to record highs, it’s true. But he also remains the unknown element. He is, in some fundamental ways, “the outsider” to the American psyche. He is neither wholly black nor white on the racial radar. He is a Christian who was raised – in part – in Muslim climes. He has that familiar face but with the funny name. He’s not what we’re used to seeing. And in a number of these crucial swing states, people who may be reluctant to say things which could be perceived as racially charged to pollsters still have a sliver of doubt in their hearts. The day will come when they have to step into the voting booth and pull that lever. Will they take a chance on what they do not know and can not fully relate to?

I will not be at all surprised if the aging, experienced populations of Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania find themselves in significant portions unable to cast a vote for the unknown on Election Day. The pollsters may go in on the evening of November 3rd telling us that these crucial states hold a thin majority for Obama, but when we awaken on November 5th, I will be equally sanguine in seeing that they wound up voting for what they know rather than what they hope for. In fact, as the day of reckoning draws near, I will not be shocked to see the polls taking a last-minute turn in McCain’s direction.

This is not in any way a statement that I am supporting Senator McCain over Senator Obama. I will be casting my vote for Bob Barr this fall, and I’ll sleep all the better knowing I’ve done so. Neither of these major party candidates inspires any confidence in me that they will be wise stewards of our fiscal health. But having watched American elections first-hand since Nixon’s initial victory, I’ve seen this movie play out enough times before. The way things look in early October is rarely how they wind up after the polls close. If you think John McCain is out of this race – and I may be wrong – I believe that a shock may still be in store for you. We are creatures of habit as a nation, and our habits in hard times do not run in the direction the current polls indicate.

  • Elyas
    Actually, the way things look in October is almost always how they end up on election day when you're looking at numbers like Obama's. Almost every candidate who broke 50% in the October Gallup poll has gone on to win, and almost every candidate who led by 8% in October has gone on to win.

    There are too many states in play--more than Pennsylvania, Florida, and Ohio--for McCain to pull out a win without drastically shifting the national numbers back in his direction.
  • Interesting that you write this, Jazz. I noticed recently that Obama's ancestry has ceased to register on my psyche altogether. Furthermore, after a 2 year long campaign, I'd be surprised if many people (who's minds aren't already made up for some other reasons) find his name at all odd anymore.

    But maybe that's just me.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Two points:

    "When the country is in trouble, voters turn to what they know and trust from the past."

    This may be true in general, but these are not "general" times, as McCain was and is part of the reason our country is in trouble. Furthermore, he is from the same party, and a staunch supporter of the same administration that got us exactly into this mess.

    Still, "furthermore," our country has gotten into the worst trouble (crisis) in many years just during the last few of weeks. And, guess what, the polls have not truned, nor are turning, in favor of McCain---just the opposite. McCain himself realizes that this time "when the country is in trouble" voters are not flocking to him. That's why he and his you betcha sidekick are now turning to sleaze, slime, and lies as a last resort.

    Second, as to Obama being “the outsider;” "being neither wholly black nor white;" "being a Christian who was raised – in part – in Muslim climes;" having a "funny name"; being "not what we’re used to seeing;" and all that other hogwash, I have better expectations from the American people.
  • The country doesn't like Republicans right now. So unless McCain can convince independents that he's not a Republican, he's screwed.
  • JWeidner
    Yeah, not sure about this analysis. Obama's opening up wider leads across the country and we're weeks into the financial crisis now. I just don't think people look to McCain anymore and say "now THERE'S someone I can trust to lead us through these dark and stormy times".

    He's no Reagan, at any rate, who was able to rally the country behind the New Day for America vision. McCain has nothing similar to offer.

    It's one of the reasons I decided that Obama's ability to offer soaring speaches was going to be a plus for his administration. A president, beyond just offering policy positions for Congress to act on (or ignore, as the case may be) needs to be able to rally the people of this country. Whether Obama will be successful at that or not, I don't know - the electorate has been highly polarized and it's hard to tell how that will all shake out. But I do know he has a better chance of inspiring us and getting us to share a vision for the way forward for this country. McCain hasn't offered that, as far as I can tell.
  • Ahhhh.... (*rubs hand together evilly) This post elicits exactly the sort of response I'd hoped for.

    MUA HA HA HAH AHA

    *cough*

    My evil scientist imitation is so far off these days.
  • JSpencer
    Very simply, if the electorate is too naive, too frightened, too incapable of seeing what has been happening here over the past decade, then we deserve to continue our descent. All the brilliant minds who conceived this country in the first place, and all the Americans who sacrificed so much over the past two centuries will have been wasted on this present population of fools. Sorry, I can't put it any more succinctly than this. If the likes of McCain and Palin are elected, the we will have proven ourselves unworthy of inheriting a country that has so much rich history, and once held so much promise.
  • JSpencer
    Jazz, you're not a well person. ;-)
  • JSpencer, would you indulge me for a second? (Jazz, too, since this is off-topic):

    Your comment talks about the country, and the brilliant minds who conceived it. Do you think our government structure today resembles the vision they had?
  • Actually, JSpencer made the point for me which this entire thought experiment was aiming at. Frankly, in my own vision of America (which I'm still hopeful may be true) none of this comes to pass and Obama really *will* wind up winning.

    NOTE: I'm still not supporting Obama, but all things being equal, I think the facts on the ground indicate that he *should* win.

    The whole point here was to pose the question: Are we at a point, as a society, where we will run to the familiar, as in what we knew in "the good old days" of the Rich Old White Guys club, or have we truly moved on? I live near the upstate NY / PA border, and there are plenty of places in both Pennsylvania and Ohio where I find that question to be in doubt. But wouldn't it be nice if I were wrong?

    Sorry if it seems like I'm playing some psychological games here, but the original post stands on its own. Are we still a nation - at least in the swing states - where the comfort of what we have traditionally pictured as "the winning man" will carry the day? Or will we opt for something new?
  • Maggie22
    Like the others, I think you'd already be seeing that leap to safety if people actually thought McCain was safe. But there's at least four reasons why Obama would seem like the safe harbor just now:

    1. McCain's own admission that he doesn't know much economics. He then proved to us that this was true with his response to the crisis which was all over the map.

    2. No Republican seems safe in a Great Depression scenario. It might be that we call on Republicans for other sorts of emergencies -- but this is the emergency that drives us to the Democrats. FDR >>> Hoover.

    3. This drive off the cliff comes after 8 years of Republican rule. Why keep driving with a Republican. Especially one as inept as we see in #1.

    4. McCain is old and his would-be replacement inspires even less confidence, if that's even possible.

    I should add, btw, that while I #2 and #3 shouldn't carry as much weight as they do, I think McCain has proven himself to be utterly unfit for office at a time when we are entering into a crisis of this magnitude. It's not just that he doesn't know anything about economics, it's that he doesn't know anybody who's going to give him good advice about it. His team of economic advisors is shockingly thin (and it's not like Republicans don't have good players on the bench). Obama, by contrast, has the absolute best of the best working with him on this. Paul Volcker, Larry Summers, Joseph Stiglitz, etc. etc. etc. Those are the guys I want in charge ASAP. Oh yeah, and McCain, genius that he is, has made noise about getting rid of Bernancke, who actually is pretty much exactly the guy you want in there, seeing as how he's the world's #1 expert on the Great Depression. McCain is so in love with making the gesture of letting heads roll that he could well roll the one head he's got in there who might actually be helpful. Gadzooks.

    You are right that McCain has some kind of rep. And you might be right that he hasn't completely destroyed it. But if you are, God help us. Cause we would have just elected the worst possible person for the job at this time. Not saying Obama is going to make it all better. But at least we have a shot with him.
  • ladysmith
    Check this out.....http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/why_obama_will_lose.html
  • ladysmith
  • elrod
    Interesting thought experiment, Jazz...

    This is why Obama called McCain "erratic." He's painting McCain as uncertain and unsafe on the economy. World issues (non-economic) are very low on the list of worries right now.
  • elrod
    Ladysmith,
    That piece reads like pure wishful thinking from inside the GOP bunker.

    The polls don't lie: the financial crisis has helped Obama, not McCain. Voters don't think McCain has the judgment or temperament to lead in this crisis. Maybe they would in a 9/11. But this is an economic crisis and McCain is weak.
  • JSpencer
    Jazz, there are many places around the mid-Michigan area where that question is in doubt as well, at least based on some of the people I talk with. Maybe I'm just spending too much time with the wrong people - I hope that's the case. ;-)

    Polimom, my short answer to your question would be no. They would certainly recognize the basic structure, but they would see that structure as heavily compromised and the spirit behind the structure as weak. The founders certainly were men of great vision, and we owe them much for that, but there were things they would have had no way of foreseeing - the huge population, high tech advances in transportation and communication, advances in medicine that have greatly increased the average lifespan, environmental changes on a massive scale... all these things have drastically changed our social structure and our habitat, and have in turn put new demands on our democracy.

    That said, I still believe the basic structure has more value than the people who currently inhabit it, and yet the structure is useless without people who understand and appreciate the original vision. The founders planted some really, really good seeds, but they knew it would all be out of their hands in due time.
  • superdestroyer
    Anyone who thinks that McCain has a chance of winning needs to put down the crack pipe and step away from the computers.

    Image that the real legacy of the Bush II Administration is that is will probably be the last Republican Administration.
  • Jim_Satterfield
    American Thinker doesn't ever think outside the Republican box.
  • JSpencer
    Polimom, were you going somewhere in particular with that question, or were you just encouraging me to ramble on. ;-)
  • CStanley
    It's one thing to move beyond a reflexive turn toward the old and familiar, but unfortunately I believe the pendulum has swung in the other direction. Instead of honestly assessing whether a member of the older generation might have some wisdom to offer, our youth obsessed culture completely dismisses that and asks for 'change'.
  • JWeidner
    CStanley, I haven't seen anything from McCain that indicates he has anything to offer us, particularly any sort of leadership in this time of economic crisis. By his own admission, he doesn't know enough about economics. Frankly, in my opinion his involvement with Charles Keating disqualifies McCain from offering even advice on how to balance a checkbook.

    Leaving aside that, McCain doesn't have the temperament to be president. I can't say it any plainer than that. McCain is another "shoot first, ask questions later" type of personality. I've had enough of that during the last 8 years. If Republicans wanted to be taken seriously, perhaps they should have given the nomination to a candidate with more to offer.

    As an independent, I've voted both sides of the aisle, depending on what I felt the country needed at that particular time. Right now, the Republicans don't need to worry about my vote for the forseeable future. Their mismanagement at the executive and legislative levels has been disastrous.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Our youth obsessed culture?

    Obama is 50 years old!! And Palin is 45!!

    I'm not saying they're geezers. But they're not exactly youngsters, either.
  • Speaking as somebody on the downhill side of the half century mark, they're BOTH young punks! :-)

    Oh, and Obama is actually 47. He was born in Aug. of 1961.
  • JSpencer -- I was / am / hope to go somewhere in particular indeed. I have some pretty big concerns around this question. I just haven't fleshed out how I want to approach the subject yet. I opened a thread for some dialogue on my own blog (here). I probably need to just cross-post and try for a wider dialogue over here at TMV.
  • TrueAmerican
    Anyone who votes for Obama is not a true American. How can you bring yourself to vote for a man who won't even put his hand over his heart when the National Anthem is playing. Obama does not care about this country, if he did he would not associate with people who hate this country, and would not say he would sit down without preconditions with our enemies. I would never vote for this man, we have enough enemies in the third world, we don't need one in the White House.

    I know that on November 4th, the Patriotic Americans will rise up and Elect McCain/Palin!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC