An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Sarah Palin on Hot Button Issues

CBS has made another Sarah Palin Interview with Katie Couric available. It’s an interesting look at Palin’s views on some of the hot-button issues like abortion and homosexuality.

Here is the link to the interview:

For those who aren’t patient, here are the highlights:


On the environment:

Couric: What’s your position on global warming? Do you believe it’s man-made or not?

Palin: Well, we’re the only Arctic state, of course, Alaska. So we feel the impacts more than any other state, up there with the changes in climates. And certainly, it is apparent. We have erosion issues. And we have melting sea ice, of course. So, what I’ve done up there is form a sub-cabinet to focus solely on climate change. Understanding that it is real. And …

Couric: Is it man-made, though in your view?

Palin: You know there are – there are man’s activities that can be contributed to the issues that we’re dealing with now, these impacts. I’m not going to solely blame all of man’s activities on changes in climate. Because the world’s weather patterns are cyclical. And over history we have seen change there. But kind of doesn’t matter at this point, as we debate what caused it. The point is: it’s real; we need to do something about it.

On abortion:

Couric: If a 15-year-old is raped by her father, do you believe it should be illegal for her to get an abortion, and why?

Palin: I am pro-life. And I’m unapologetic in my position that I am pro-life. And I understand there are good people on both sides of the abortion debate. In fact, good people in my own family have differing views on abortion, and when it should be allowed. Do I respect people’s opinions on this. Now, I would counsel to choose life. I would also like to see a culture of life in this country. But I would also like to take it one step further. Not just saying I am pro-life and I want fewer and fewer abortions in this country, but I want them, those women who find themselves in circumstances that are absolutely less than ideal, for them to be supported, and adoptions made easier.

Couric: But ideally, you think it should be illegal for a girl who was raped or the victim of incest to get an abortion?

Palin: I’m saying that, personally, I would counsel the person to choose life, despite horrific, horrific circumstances that this person would find themselves in. And, um, if you’re asking, though, kind of foundationally here, should anyone end up in jail for having an … abortion, absolutely not. That’s nothing I would ever support.

On contraception:

Couric: Some people have credited the morning-after pill for decreasing the number of abortions. How do you feel about the morning-after pill?

Palin: Well, I am all for contraception. And I am all for preventative measures that are legal and save, and should be taken, but Katie, again, I am one to believe that life starts at the moment of conception. And I would like to see …

Couric: And so you don’t believe in the morning-after pill?

Palin: … I would like to see fewer and fewer abortions in this world. And again, I haven’t spoken with anyone who disagrees with my position on that.

Couric: I’m sorry, I just want to ask you again. Do you not support or do you condone or condemn the morning-after pill.

Palin: Personally, and this isn’t McCain-Palin policy …

Couric: No, that’s OK, I’m just asking you.

Palin: But personally, I would not choose to participate in that kind of contraception.

On homosexuality:

Palin: …But what you’re talking about, I think, value here, what my position is on homosexuality and you can pray it away, because I think that was the title that was listed on that bulletin. And you know, I don’t know what prayers are worthy of being prayed. I don’t know what’s prayers are going to be asked and answered. But as for homosexuality, I am not going to judge Americans and the decisions that they make in their adult personal relationships. I have one of my absolute best friends for the last 30 years happens to be gay, and I love her dearly. And she is not my “gay friend,” she is one of my best friends, who happens to have made a choice that isn’t a choice that I have made. But I am not going to judge people.

So, what have we learned from this?

Well, that Palin in a conservative, no doubt, but not a religious right clone. As far one can tell from this interview, she isn’t interested in pushing her agenda on everyone else. She said more than once that her views were her views, not of the campaign or that they should be enacted.

I was somewhat pleased by her views on homosexuality. Yes, being gay is not a choice, but still, she showed a tolerance that is welcome to hear from a Republican politician.

Will this interview mean anything to a diehard Obama supporter? Probably not. But it does show a Palin that is not the religious right charictature that we have seen lately.

  • pacatrue
    It's always funny how people read different things in the same material. I kept thinking how her answers wandered, avoided, or didn't really seem to get the question. For instance, the reason it's important if climate change is man-made is that it radically affects how you tackle the problem. If climate change were just a sun warming cycle, you would tackle the problem completely differently than if it's caused by the human release of greenhouse gases. If she doesn't get this, she could never make a sound judgment on environmental policy should she become President.

    With the abortion issue, she seemed to either not get it or avoid giving a straight response. We know she would not choose an abortion herself. That's a common decision on both the pro-choice and pro-life side. She did say she wouldn't lock up the woman who had an abortion, but would she lock up the doctor who provided one? That's the key difference between the pro-choice and pro-life positions.

    Similarly on contraception. We know she wouldn't buy the morning after pill, but will she oppose it being available to women who would or not? Again, that is the policy difference.
  • 52novels
    She didn't say that homosexuality "isn't a choice." She actually asserts that it is a choice:

    "... she is one of my best friends, who happens to have made a choice that isn’t a choice that I have made. ..."

    In her folksy, quaint way she said, "she's one of my best friends who happens to have made a choice I didn't make."
  • elrod
    Saying that homosexuality is a choice - and adult (or adolescent) choice at that - is the core of homophobia. Everything comes from that conclusion.

    Like other religious right politicians she knows better than to say that homosexuals should be stoned to death. But her views are no more moderate than the people behind the Bush Administration. And that means more Monica Goodlings.
  • StockBoySF
    pacatrue, I'm mad at you... those were exactly my comments! Thief! You should be locked up! :)

    I can only add a couple things... She came across as very sympathetic on the issues and very moderate... a lot of people will love her and McCain's ratings will go up if she does this well in the interview. And she will be inoculated- people will ask, "Everyone said she can't handle herself but I agree with her on a lot of this and she did great!" So whenever a charge is leveled at some post-debate performance / interview people will think that she just had a bad day because she proved herself in (one) debate.

    Palin needs to be drawn out. For instance on the abortion issue that pacatrue beat me to... if McCain wants Roe v. Wade to be overturned and abortion made illegal, then who will be locked up if abortions are performed? Palin also said she is for equal rights for women, and that makes sense and everyone agrees with that. But will she actually FIGHT for equal rights and if so, what are her specific policy proposals? Same goes for other minorities, including gays and lesbians. She may have a best friend who is a lesbian, so what does that specifically mean?

    Palin will wow people if she can talk in the generalities as she did in this interview. She came across very well (except for the global warming and which magazines / newspapers she read). Anyone who is even halfway inclined to support Palin will be able to imprint their beliefs on her and support her. The issue is having these folks do critical thinking as part of their evaluation process. Palin needs to be asked about specifics.
  • pacatrue
    Elrod said, "Saying that homosexuality is a choice - and adult (or adolescent) choice at that - is the core of homophobia. Everything comes from that conclusion."

    While I agree that homosexuality as choice is a core belief of many homophobes (though many also think of it as a disease, which is not really choice-like), the supposedly critical question of sexuality as biological or choice has been a beef of mine for a long time. Namely, I don't reach anything like the same conclusions as those who condemn homosexuality do even if it is a choice.

    What? If it's a choice, we are free to kick people out of housing, prevent them from visiting the one they love in the hospital, isolate them socially, and maybe even threaten them physically? But if it is not a choice, then all that is off? Religion is more a choice than not, at least in the U.S., and yet we have no problem saying that you can't discriminate based upon religion. We know it's a fundamental part of who someone is that we don't try to cure them of their Christianity or Judaism or Taoism. Love, desire, and sexuality are just as fundamental to our own identity as religious belief. Moreover, sexuality as biological often falls into the false trap of two simple categories -- either homosexual or heterosexual. And yet all studies of sexuality reveal much more fluid categories than that.

    In short, my moral beliefs seem to change very little whether sexuality is a choice or not.

    Stepping off soap box. Back to the Palin interview....
  • Gichin13
    Andrew Sullivan has been posting for a couple weeks now trying to find her supposed gay friends and not a single blip has hit that screen. Maybe they are not open and she is being honest.

    Given her track record on veracity, I cannot give her the benefit of the doubt though.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    Pacatrue said:

    It's always funny how people read different things in the same material.


    Then StockBoySF said:

    pacatrue, I'm mad at you... those were exactly my comments!


    Me too, Pacatrue!
  • DLS
    Dennis: What you see is that Palin is not the monster the Left, which includes the media, has dishonestly tried to depict in order to try to assure McCain's defeat and Obama's victory this November (dishonest behavior that is predictably routine).

    Stockster: Roe v. Wade is an illegitimate activist decision. That in no way implies, much less indicates, opposition to abortion, nor are state laws in lieu of Roe v. Wade harsh. You _did_ see the Web page of state laws on abortion I've provided more than once on this site, didn't you? You _have_ read Roe v. Wade and in particular the part of the decision that is the worst example of "legislation from the bench," what is commonly called the "trimester rule," haven't you? (I have provided it before on this site, and of course it's freely available elsewhere on-line any time to be reviewed.)

    Couric _should_ be sorry...
  • RememberNovember
    Hey everybody, let's pray the gay away!
    / end scarcasm.

    "She is a Governor of Alaska, who happens to have made a choice to become a VP candidate ,that isn't a choice I have made " makes more sense, ya you betcha!
  • RememberNovember
    DLS, now with 50% more right wing talking points.
  • lol @ November. I don't know who DLS thinks is saying she's a monster. What I've heard is that she's a lightweight and unqualified for the job. I agree.
  • elrod
    DLS is sliding more and more into Hannityland.
  • StockBoySF
    GeorgeSorwell, I guess the challenge for you and I will be to see who can be quicker than pacatrue next time. :)
  • DLS
    [sigh] I should have realized that there's no guarantee here of intellectual and other forms of maturity among other users.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC