An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Bill Kristol Lowers His Standard on “Experience”

Well, Bill Kristol, who spent a whole afternoon “with Palin a little over a year ago in Juneau,”—probably more than McCain spent with Palin before “vetting” her last week—is excited about McCain’s “bold vice-presidential pick,” and, after having “followed her career pretty closely,” believes that she “can pull it off” in “A Star Is Born?”

After having harped for 18 months about Barack Obama’s alleged lack of experience, Kristol dismisses Palin’s real lack of experience by continuing to use the newly minted Republican benchmark that “She’s only running for the No. 2 job, after all…”, and “McCain doesn’t need a foreign policy expert as vice president to help him out.”

Kristol chimes in with what Charlie Black, one of McCain’s top advisers, is quoted as having said by the New York Times: “She’s going to learn national security at the foot of the master for the next four years…”

Never mind that she’ll be literally a heartbeat away from stepping into the No. 1 job, considering McCain’s age, his history with skin cancer, and the uncertainties of life. Never mind, that she may not have four years, or one year, or one day to “learn at the foot of the master.”

And, by the way, the fact that Alaska has a border with Russia doesn’t really count as “foreign experience.” Nor do her stops in Ireland and Germany during what may have been her only foreign travel. She did visit Kuwait, not Iraq, during her extensive globetrotting. According to the New York Times, she didn’t even have a passport until 2007. That doesn’t mean, however, that she may not have had extensive foreign travel and gathered an impressive amount of foreign experience with vacation trips to Mexico and the Caribbean, before passports were required.

Even Kristol admits that “McCain has gambled boldly” on this “bold” pick, and asks, “But what was McCain’s alternative?”

Well, McCain’s alternatives were Lieberman, Romney, Huckabee, Hutchison, Bobby Jindal, Charlie Christ, Tim Pawlenty, Tom Ridge, etc., etc. But, of course, these candidates did not nearly have the experience of Palin.

Finally, and strangely enough, Kristol agrees with what Obama has been offering America all along, and with what the American people want by pointing out that:

…the crucial political fact is that the Obama campaign no longer has a monopoly on “the courage to change.” Facing an electorate that wants change, McCain has given himself a fighting chance to win the election.

Wow, wasn’t “change” something else Bill Kristol has been ridiculing Obama for all along?

The fact that Bill Kristol isn’t sure about anything anymore with respect to McCain is perhaps best illustrated by the question mark in the title of his piece, “A Star Is Born?”

  • jwest
    It’s amazing that our left-of-center friends have stumbled on to the word “experience”.

    When it was Barak versus Hillary, there didn’t seem to be much need for a resume, only “change” mattered.

    As has been pointed out in the other threads, Barak and Biden lack any executive experience at all. Palin has been an effective governor and reformer.

    Republicans see the fact that she’s a woman as a plus. It’s too bad the democrats seem to think its reason for disqualification.
  • As has been pointed out in the other threads

    You pointed it out in other threads, and your arguments were roundly refuted by logic and evidence.

    Republicans see the fact that she’s a woman as a plus. It’s too bad the democrats seem to think its reason for disqualification.

    Now you're just being an a**hole.
  • BBQ
    And your an ideologue.
  • bacalove
    Scarborough reacts to Palin!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTbsbeY5k5k

    A great video in which the Pundits are being truthful before her actual nomination!

    Let's see how they spin it this week.
  • elrod
    Again, executive experience in Juneau for 18 months (and Wasilla before that) does not in any way transfer to qualification for the White House. It doesn't disqualify John McCain for having no governing experience and it doesn't disqualify Obama or Biden. To jump from lower-level experience to a higher level you need to make the case for how you would apply your experiences and lessons, and vision that guides those lessons. With Palin we see nothing of the sort. Her reform cred is mostly bogus, her honesty is in serious doubt, and her temperament matches McCain...in a bad way.

    Finally, it's not that Palin is too inexperienced to lead. It's that McCain has been saying for months that Obama is too inexperienced. Is that talking point now defunct:? Is this now John McCain v. 6.0?

    Judgment and temperament. One team has it. And it's not the GOP.
  • jwest
    Since we’ve beaten the experience thing to death in past few threads, let’s talk about Elrod’s point of judgment.

    I keep hearing about Obama’s judgment concerning his opposition on going to war with Iraq in 2002. Is this what you want in a President?

    When every intelligence agency in the world, the previous administration and even some of Saddam’s own generals were saying he had WMD, is it good judgment to ignore the evidence?
  • jwest,
    Thanks for the laugh.
  • jdledell
    I was a Senior Executive of an International financial firm running operations with 18,000 employees and annual revenue in excess of $25 billion. I can testify that "Executive experience" is no big deal. It's the intellectual and personality characteristics that really are important. Judgement, intellectual curiosity, an inate ability to make cost benefit evauations, the ability to judge people and to motivate them that make a good executive.

    By these counts Barak's building an efficient 50 state campaign organization and wisely spending the $367 million he has so far collected is a good measure of talent. More importantly, Barak has spent years studing important issues like Constitutional Law, political economics, community organizations, foreign affairs and meeting and learning from some of the foremost learned people in America.

    Without being condescending, Sarah Palin did go to college but as far as I can tell was somewhat undistinquished academically - certainly not ready for Harvard Law School. She seems like a wonderful mom and wife ( I am NOT denigrating those qualities) but her interests seem rather localized - hunting and fishing, snowmobiling, schools and local politics. Has she ever shown much interest in life beyong Alaska?
  • StockBoySF
    I've never been a fan of Bill Kristol... all he does is cherry-pick certain pieces of an argument to make his case.

    Of course Kristol has now lowered his standards on "experience" when it comes to the executive branch. I don't expect very much from him and he continues to deliver very little.
  • JSpencer
    jdledell, thanks for jumping in with the reality check. Tit for tat sniping and attention seeking behavior accomplishes nothing, but an honest look at what these candidates have to offer does. It seems as though intellectual curiousity, passion, and ability have been anathema to the right for some time now, so it should be no surprise to see someone like Obama generating so much interest. As for Bill Kristol, his main shtick seems to propping up phony arguments for the right - even if it means having to ignore his own hypocrisy. Apparently that's not a problem for some folks.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC