An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Why John McCain Picked Sarah Palin For Vice President

The questions swirling around the political and punditry classes since Republican certain Presidential nominee Sen. John McCain picked Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin have been: why…and exactly when? The New York Times provides some answers which should give McCain’s fans and foes plenty of ammunition.

The bottom line: McCain realized he could face a virtual party revolt if he chose his first choice, his friend and political soulmate Connecticut independent Sen. Joe Lieberman. He didn’t want to be seen as pure GOP establishment, sought to regain his 2000 maverick aura and noticed a bunch of angry Hillary Clinton supporters out there just waiting for a new candidate.

So he made a quick choice, choosing someone he had never met before their first chat — and went with his gut.

For weeks, advisers close to the campaign said, Mr. McCain had wanted to name as his running mate his good friend Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, the Democrat turned independent. But by the end of last weekend, the outrage from Christian conservatives over the possibility that Mr. McCain would fill out the Republican ticket with Mr. Lieberman, a supporter of abortion rights, had become too intense to be ignored.

With time running out, and after a long meeting with his inner circle in Phoenix, Mr. McCain finally picked up the phone last Sunday and reached Ms. Palin at the Alaska State Fair. Although the campaign’s polling on Mr. McCain’s potential running mates was inconclusive on the selection of Ms. Palin — virtually no one had heard of her, a McCain adviser said — the governor, who opposes abortion, had glowing reviews from influential social conservatives.

Mr. McCain was comfortable with two others on his short list, Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota and former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. But neither was the transformative, attention-grabbing choice Mr. McCain felt he needed, top campaign advisers said, to help him pivot from his image as the custodian of the status quo to a change agent like his Democratic rival, Senator Barack Obama.

Keep in mind that we’ve written posts here during the campaign season about McCain walking a tightrope: trying to somehow keep those who supported him in 2000 because he was a self-professed straight-talking “maverick” who didn’t always agree with his party while trying to win over parts of the Republican Party that opposed and demonized him in 2000. His image makeover for the GOP began with that famous photo of him hugging President George W. Bush. His political gut probably told him he needed to win back many of his 2000 fans if he had a chance to beat Obama, whose well-received speech solidified the Illinois Senator’s change argument.

Another key factor, the Times reports, was “Mr. Obama’s decision to pass over Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as his running mate opened the possibility for Republicans to put a woman on the ticket and pick off some of Mrs. Clinton’s supporters.” And here’s what happened next:

At 11 a.m. on Thursday, at the McCain vacation compound near Sedona, Ariz., Mr. McCain invited Ms. Palin to join him on the ticket. He hardly knew her, and she had virtually no foreign policy experience, but Ms. Palin was a “kindred spirit,” a McCain adviser said. Mr. McCain was betting, the adviser said, that she would help him reclaim the mantle of maverick that he had lost this year.

The selection was the culmination of a five-month process, described by Mr. McCain’s inner circle and outside advisers in interviews this past weekend, and offers a glimpse into how Mr. McCain might make high-stakes decisions as president.

At the very least, the process reflects Mr. McCain’s history of making fast, instinctive and sometimes risky decisions. “I make them as quickly as I can, quicker than the other fellow, if I can,” Mr. McCain wrote, with his top adviser Mark Salter, in his 2002 book, “Worth the Fighting For.” “Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.”

This explains some of the dismay that can now be seen in some Republican circles in choosing Palin, who this weekend faced the embarrassing spectacle of Alaska’s two biggest newspapers questioning her fitness…and quotes from some top Republicans in Alaska questioning it as well.

Palin’s pick also seems to have caused blogger Andrew Sullivan, an Obama admirer and one-time admirer of McCain’s, to make a clean break from the national GOP ticket on the grounds that McCain is a loose cannon. He writes:

The Palin pick says much more about McCain than it does about Palin (all it says about her is that she didn’t have the good sense to turn it down). What it says about McCain is that he is more interested in politics than policy, more interested in campaigning than governing, tactical when he should be strategic, and reckless when he should be considered.

He is as big a gamble as president as Palin is as vice-president. This decision was about gut, about politics, about cynicism, and about vanity. It’s Bushism metastasized.

  • JSpencer
    I agree with Sullivan, the pick says more about McCain than it does about Palin. It was a political gamble rather than a governing decision. If she turns out to be more substantial than what's showing so far, then I'll be glad of it - we've had more than enough recklessness in govt. these past several years.
  • Manchester2
    Here's Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard:

    "McCain couldn't mobilize the Republican base, but Palin can. Indeed, she already has. By 10 P.M. Friday, the day her selection was announced, the McCain campaign had raised $4 million online--more than six times its previous daily record."

    Money talks, eh?
  • Mike_P
    Sullivan notes "all it says about her is that she didn’t have the good sense to turn it down." That is exactly what I've been thinking for a couple of days now. What does it say about her that she would even consider accepting the offer?

    I think the almost manic spin from the right that has accompanied her selection speaks volumes. And as the days go by, the depression that follows is based in the wide realization that it is disastrous. If there was any real thought about what she could bring to the ticket, it was defensive - an attempt to woo the base, instead of the middle. That a Republican candidate is still so worried about his base at this late date is a bad sign. That he would respond to that fear with a remarkably bad decision is quite likely fatal.
  • Silhouette
    One thing's for sure. If Hillary Clinton was our candidate we'd all have our feet up sipping iced tea, or rolling up our sleeves and dedicating our time to helping the Gustav victims instead of dedicating it worrying about Sarah Palin being a threat to a democratic win this Fall.

    But instead, "DNC" agendas forced us all to be worrying our butts off right now. Cuz we know there's going to be millions of former Clinton supporters out expressing their justified venom for the DNC behind the voting curtains this Fall...

    Thanks DNC. Here's to your wise judgement and forethought! Here's the math they gambled on:: the 13% of african-american vote in the democratic population vs the 52% female vote in the democratic population. (yes, I know not all women were for Clinton, but bear with the numbers) Hispanics were largely for Clinton. So factor that in too at 14%. So essentially the DNC gambled with Obama's certain 13% vs a somewhat more uncertain 66%+. Bear in mind that ALL percentages would've lined up squarely behind Clinton because Obama's support is overwhelmingly left and never in their wildest dreams would line up behind McCain/Palin, while much of Clinton support teetered in the middle and the DNC knew full-well they were in danger of losing them to "the other side".

    So good math dems! If this isn't a pitch for improving public education at all levels, nothing is..

    Palin was a smart choice, not the best choice but a strategically effective choice. And all because the GOP knows how to do simple arithmetic.
  • kumicho
    Silhouette - It's called a primary, and Obama won it. Thankfully, we still have the right to vote for the candidate of our choice, regardless of who would've been "better".
  • Silhouette
    So this is about who you have a "right" to vote for, even if that "right" guarantees a democratic loss?

    Yeah, I guess you're right. And that's why you're going to have a GOP administration for four more years because you cannot put your petty ego of your "right" behind what would've been best for your party and by extension, your nation and even the world.

    Way to get your priorities striaight.. This really is the "me" generation...
  • jackie2
    "At the very least, the process reflects Mr. McCain’s history of making fast, instinctive and sometimes risky decisions. “I make them as quickly as I can, quicker than the other fellow, if I can,” Mr. McCain wrote, with his top adviser Mark Salter, in his 2002 book, “Worth the Fighting For.” “Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.”"

    His finger on the Red Button scares the beejebus out of me.
  • jdledell
    "Yeah, I guess you're right. And that's why you're going to have a GOP administration for four more years because you cannot put your petty ego of your "right" behind what would've been best for your party and by extension, your nation and even the world."

    Silhouette - Your words should have the same effect on your position. Your anger (as well as other women) over Hillary's loss has blinded you to what another Republican administration can do to this country. With the increase in Executive powers authored by Bush, there is almost no limit to the damage McCain can do. You call yourself a Democrat and yet you would vote for a man who is the antithesis of Hillary Clinton. You have that right but be aware of the consequences.
  • Ricorun
    “Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.”"

    Fine for him. But apparently he expects the rest of America to do so as well.
  • vwcat
    McCain has had a jealous tantrum over obama all summer. On his site he use to have that he was a celebrity until he began to attack Obama for the same thing.
    But, mcCain has always been far more of one then Obama.
    But, I don't see how McCain is known as maverick because he picked a favorite of the evangie base. He needed them and their money. She brought them out and the money for his campaign.
    They have been pushing for her and this is not being a maverick.
    I also think once the media gets it's act together and gets tired of the human interest angle and starts poking around about her they may find she is not mavericky fun person they are thinking now.
    That she has some serious problems in Alaska and there are reasons why she is not being applauded by her own state's papers and everyone up there is stratching their heads as why McCain would pick her of all people.
    Even her mother in law is not sure she will vote for the ticket and thinks she is not ready for that job.
    She is not that fun, mavericky and loved in alaska from what I've been hearing.
  • StockBoySF
    Ricorun, you beat me to my exact comment. :) Do we really want a president making decisions that will impact everyone in this country, a president who freely acknowledges he makes hasty and bad decisions and yet he is willing to live with them with no complaint?

    I can see it now, "I made the decision to drop nuclear bombs on Iran but I had no idea that other countries would be upset or that it would send the cost of gasoline to $15/gallon. It was a hasty decision and it turned out to be wrong. That's the price we pay sometimes for hasty decisions. I'm sorry it wrecked the US economy and you can't even afford to drive to the grocery store. But I've still got my seven houses (eight if you include the White House) and so I have no complaints. You're just a nation of whiners."
  • vwcat
    Silhouette,
    If you don't like the democratic nominee and want to throw a continuing temper tantrum then please go to your room so we adults don't have to listen to it. You can hold your breath and stomp your feet all you want. Or better yet, go and play in traffic with all the rest of the 25 PUMAs who Chris Matthews refered to a wackos.
    Go, please, go and vote for McInsane and his puppy dog, Palin.
    Go and sign up with Redstate and have at it.
    But, please, your continued whining and crying and pouting is annoying and childish.
    You don't like Obama. Fine. We get it. We don't care.
    We are just sick of your immature tantrums and foot stomping.
  • joep
    Joe's post is right on point and brings out an amazing thing about McCain's lack of judgement. The dems run the false theme that Hill and Bill are still holding grudges going into the convention. The intent is to get the press going into the personality thing to create interest in the convention. A little continuing drama to fit a narrative the media has been running with since January.

    Meanwhile prior to the convention, McCain reads the same newsreports and becomes fixated on the continuing battle between the Clintons and Obama. He runs ads about how great Hillary is and how she was dissed. The Republicans go with the PUMA thing to bring out the differences. He then makes the decision to focus on Palin as the democratic convention starts. Locks in his selection based on the preconvention hype.


    It does the intended job. As should have been expected, in their convention speeches on Tuesday and Wednesday Hill & Bill come through as true democrats and offer a huge endorsement to Obama. The drama was great political theater. The dems run their convention and low and behold, it was all a sham. Hill and Bill love them some Obama. And McCain is stuck with Palin.

    What a loser.
  • Silhouette
    *Silhouette - Your words should have the same effect on your position. Your anger (as well as other women) over Hillary's loss has blinded you to what another Republican administration can do to this country. With the increase in Executive powers authored by Bush, there is almost no limit to the damage McCain can do. You call yourself a Democrat and yet you would vote for a man who is the antithesis of Hillary Clinton. You have that right but be aware of the consequences."~ jdledell

    ******
    I am voting for Obama soley because he is the lesser of not-the-one. But just by the thinnest of margins. Other "angry mindless stupid emotional [yes, that's what you're implying]" females aren't going to be so gracious with their vote

    THAT IS WHAT I'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ALL ALONG.

    Just thought I'd put that in caps so you wouldnt' miss it this time.

    I'M TALKING ABOUT THE RAW MATH OF WHO WILL VOTE WHICH WAY AND WHY.

    So you don't forget what the election ACTUALLY comes down to. Not you or me, but Joe and Jane Q. Public.

    That's all-along what should've been at the forefront of the DNC mindset. You cannot in such a short timespan, change the way people think and react to simple stimuli. I can look beyond my justified anger at the DNC, but MILLIONS cannot and will not. Period.

    I got emails today from staunch left-leaning democratic women, who even though opposed to the GOP BigOil platform (as I tried unsuccessfully to argue to them) are leaning in no small way towards the Palin pick JUST TO SPITE THE DNC which they correctly assess to have acted corruptly in the interest of democrats as a whole.

    What can I say to them? "No, the DNC pro-Obama thing wasnt' rigged?" I can't argue a lie very well. Other people can. I surely cannot.

    So I guess what I'm saying is that if you want Obama to win against mounting odds to the contrary, you need to get some really good and pursuasive liars out there telling people that the DNC made an honest and best choice when they shoved Obama down our throats.

    The last thing you need to be doing is alienating MORE disgruntled female voters with your closet-misogyny and derisive comments directed towards "angry, bitter, childish...etc. etc. Clinton supporters."
  • Silhouette
    A simple way to look at Obama's problem with regards to Clinton supporters is that they just don't make beer-goggles thick enough to hide the glaring inadequacies of this empty-suited, self-worshipping buffoon. Clinton supporters are rank-and-file realists and resent having their noses pinched and koolaide poured down the backs of their throats.

    Obama has some convincing to do, and he'd better step away from his greek temple, roll up those billowy pastel sleeves and get to it.
  • Silhouette,
    If you aren't convinced by now, you're not going to be. If you could accept that Obama beat Clinton fair and square, you might even have some lingering respect for his skills as a politician.

    But you can't get over your fantasy that the election was decided in a smoky room by Howard Dean. So you feel cheated. That's logical viewpoint based on conspiracy theories, but it's logical nonetheless.

    Either way, I think I can speak for everyone here at TMV by saying, we're tired of hearing about it. Hillary Clinton is not going to be the nominee, she lost, she conceded, and she's asked her supporters to fund and vote for Barack Obama. In a word, your cause is over, at least for 4 years.
  • Silhouette
    I am not saying Clinton will be the nominee. You are trying to sideline the thrust of what I'm saying by making this a "bitter Clinton supporter still wants her as nominee".

    Reluctantly....I want "our side" to win.

    I realize we have the next shot in four years. But for RIGHT NOW we need to "get behind Barack Obama for president". *urp*...

    And on that theme we need to look hard and fast at what will get that done:

    Contrary to popular media spoon-fed "truth". The number one issue facing this nation, the one that will be what makes or breaks this election is BigOil's monopoly and how it's killing our planet. The economy will follow behind that issue because if we implement rapid and widespread alternative technology, minus unsafe nuclear and greenhouse gas producing ("clean" coal is a myth) fossil feuls, millions of new jobs will be created in engineering, construction, implementation and maintenance of these new technologies. Further, royalties from these new clean and safe power sources could be rolled back into government funds to do all sorts of new and great things for our country. We would gain back respect of the world and much-needed allies in showing them that we've "grown up" with regards to our teenage-like consumption and pollution of the world.

    New, clean, safe energy would stimulate issue #2, the economy, like a slap on a newborn baby's butt.

    So...

    If I had to advise the Obama campaign as to what to do, considering the damage that they likely cannot fix with respect to alienating pro-woman male and female Clinton supporters and how Palin woos them away, I would offer one simple and potentially very damaging idea to the McCain campaign that Obamabots should consider:

    A bumper sticker to paste over the Obama ones reading:

    BigOil owns the GOP.

    With hurricane Gustav and Hannah on its heels, so obviously a result of global warming and ergo BigOil's direct influence on our nation's demise in a very real and tangible way, coming during the GOP convention no less *giggle*, this simple tactic might actually turn the tide and get Obama into the Oval Office.

    Forget about skirts and skin color.

    Plus, how expensive would it be to print 4 million bumper stickers vs endless and endless TV commercials to beat back every twist and turn McCain throws our way?

    Another chance for democrats to crunch the numbers. Let's see if they can get it right this time..?
  • StockBoySF
    Sil, "....I want "our side" to win."

    Well, if you really want "our side" to win, then stop whining about things you can't change and start talking to your friends (and anyone else who will listen) about why McCain is a bad choice.

    Your attacks on Obama only send people to the McCain camp.
  • Silhouette
    I have been talking to my friends about it. Some are reasonable. Some are not.

    It's running about 50-50.

    You do the math.
  • Ricorun
    Silhouette: I have been talking to my friends about it. Some are reasonable. Some are not. It's running about 50-50. You do the math.

    Considering you've only been at it for a few days, 50-50 sounds pretty good. :-)

    FWIW, most of my women friends are offended by McCain's pick, though I can't say any of them have changed positions because of it. Most of those who were pro-Obama before tend to be more so now -- except more pissed off. Most of those who were pro-McCain still are, but disappointed. One of them put it this way: "She's Bobby Jindal in a skirt, except Bobby Jindal had more substance".

    Then there are a few who were previously pro-McCain who are absolutely thrilled. Every one of those, I believe, could be considered fundies.
  • patel
    Patel

    John McCain was always under wrong impression that he is only "America".
    By selecting "Sarah" as his running mate John has made one more mistake.
    God "Save" America and "Bless" America.
  • patel
    Type your comment here.
    It is a defeat and failure for John McCain.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC