An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Civil Rights Roundup: 08/26/08

Your daily dose of civil rights and related news

Ms. Magazine gives its quick take on the appointment of Hans von Spakovsky to a staff position on the US civil rights commission.

Inside Higher Ed has the scoop on the higher education elements of the Democratic Platform, including (among other things) a restatement of their support for affirmative action.

…. And here’s McCain’s plan, courtesy of the Chronicle on Higher Education, which notes McCain’s apparent reversal on that issue from the days in which he called attempted bans “divisive.”

A restaurant was forced to pay damages to a woman they fired because she was pregnant.

While the US Senate dawdles, California may take fixing Ledbetter into its own hands.

Oddly, Colorado Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to support a measure banning affirmative action, leading observers to wonder if both sides are misunderstanding what the initiative would do.

Two DNC protesters were arrested for not giving their names to the police upon request. The case (and any civil rights complaint) will hinge on whether the cops had “reasonable suspicion” that the pair was committing or was about to commit a crime.

A column in the Detroit Free Press urges Michigan to expand coverage in its bias crimes law.

Two NYPD cops are being charged with civil rights violations after assaulting a motorist in an apparent road rage incident while off duty.

Shocking news: Immigration judges subjected to political vetting by the Bush administration are disproportionately likely to reject asylum claims.

Jesse Jackson in the Chicago Sun-Times: “Obama can inspire but we must lead.”

Jacob Weisberg says that only racism can explain an Obama loss. A Wall St. Journal column ridicules that notion. I’m not going to buy into Weisberg’s thesis wholesale, but I think legitimate questions will be raised if either Obama runs way behind the generic Democratic wave in a year with such good fundamentals for his party, or if we see a major showing of the Wilder effect.

Experts say that the Canadian police must diversify if they want to remain effective in their ever-more multicultural society.

Connecticut courts have recognized that trans-gender discrimination is in violation of law prohibiting sex stereotyping.

  • superdestroyer
    Of course the political party that panders to non-whites would support Affirmative Action is all of its non-legal forms. Did they propose a constitutional amendment to make separate and unequal legal or do they just plan on the current mode of ignoring civil rights laws when the conflict with political correctness.
  • jchem
    With regard to the Affirmative Action ballot measure in CO:

    "An Aug. 13 poll by Rasmussen Reports indicated that 71 percent of Democratic respondents backed Amendment 46 compared with 34 percent of Republican participants."

    71%??? A misunderstanding? Perhaps the person quoted in the story is misunderstanding what the bill means. 71% is a pretty high number to begin to start questioning voters intelligence on an issue. The answer: The people in CO don't want it anymore, plain and simple.
  • schraubd
    But how do you explain that Democrats would be 40 points more likely to oppose affirmative action than Republicans? That defies imagination.
  • jchem
    It does defy imagination, and I can't explain it. After browsing a bit concerning the initiative, my only guess would be to point out the dual clauses in the proposed amendment--one to prohibit discrimination, the other to prohibit preferential treatment. Perhaps many are in favor of the first part and not of the second? I'm not sure.

    There are some saying the bill's wording is deceptive: http://www.citizensproject.org/PDF's/Amendment%...
  • schraubd
    Which is what I was saying. I'd expect those numbers to be inverted (70% GOP support, 30% dem support), which makes me think folks have the wrong idea about what this amendment would do.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC