An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama & The Summer Of Our Discontent

01aaahongfoto.jpg

For Barack Obama supporters, this is the summer of our discontent. While John McCain flails, Obama does a victory lap around Europe and comes home to a tanking economy and two unpopular wars, but his lead in most polls is miniscule, he is behind in one and has lost ground in a few key states. What’s going on?

After cogitating hard on this seeming paradox while spending much of the weekend off of my feet because of a big back attack — as in floating in a refreshingly cool pool and laying on a chaise lounge with a copy of John O’Hara’s Appointment in Samarra at hand — I concluded that:

*
It’s mid summer and few voters are giving the campaign the attention that the punditocracy is. That will change after Labor Day.

* Obama’s skin color, relative inexperience and questions about who he really is continue to be a drag on his candidacy.

Let’s further note that as a well-known war hero who has been in the public eye for decades, McCain should be kicking Obama’s ass in the polls, but his numbers are pretty much stagnant and have not moved appreciably as a result of a series of highly publicized smears, including playing not just the race card but the fricking arugula card.

So while voters aren’t going ga-ga over Obama, they certainly aren’t flocking to the septuagenarian sour puss.

McCain is trying hard to change the subject from the economy and those wars to Obama himself. It is incumbent on Obama to change the subject back, but campaign insiders say that he is loath to do much more than say that he’s “disappointed” over the one-time happy warrior’s personal attacks and will go after him hammer and tong following the conventions.

There is an old political adage that candidates are best defined over the summer by their opponents and not in the fall, and that certainly was true of that tax-and-spend Walter Mondale in 1984, rapist coddling Michael Dukakis in 1988 and wind-surfing girlie man John Kerry in 2004. August was the cruelest month for all of those Democrats, so why should the here and now be any different?

Because 2008 is not 1984, 1988 or 2004.

Race and other concerns over Obama aside, voters will understand that the McCain campaign’s red-herring obsessions with their opponent’s celebrity, gym regimen and fondness for exotic salad greens and protein bars is not what the future of America is about.


* * * * *

I had another thought while chilling over the weekend: When is the last time you heard or read fresh thinking from a conservative who worships at the Republican altar?

The answer, of course, is that it’s been a very long time unless you find Patrick Buchanan or Grover Norquist to be fresh thinkers. The reason, of course, is that George Bush and his band of merry neocon pranksters have bankrupted the brand and there’s nothing new in the dry well of GOP conservatism for McCain to draw from.

This doesn’t mean that they aren’t fresh conservative ideas out there. There are plenty, although the Buchanans and Norquists are trying their best to drown them out and McCain wouldn’t know what to do with them if they smacked him on his sour puss.

* * * * *

Obama has decided to forgo McCain’s proposal that they participate in town hall-format debates and instead there apparently only will be three old-style presidential debates and one vice presidential debate.

The excuse given by the Obama campaign is that there wasn’t enough time to fit in town hall debates given how late the conventions are, but that’s lame.

There is no better opportunity for Obama to score points than when he goes one-on-one with McCain even if he is too thin compared to his paunchy opponent, and town hall debates during the primary season were an invigorating change of pace.

How extraordinary that Obama, who claims incessantly to be the innovator, defaults to the same-old-same-old.

* * * * *

You could practically hear the bodies of tree huggers hitting the sea after jumping lemming-like from the nearest high cliff when Obama announced that he was now backing a limited repeal of the congressional moratorium on offshore oil drilling.

There was a certain hilarity in the cries of “flip flopper!” and “panderer!” because this crowd still doesn’t understand that Obama has been far less of a progressive than others keep portraying him.

What is not so funny is that we have had to endure nearly eight years of a president who has been categorically unable to change his mind about anything no matter how foul or screwed up it may be. Obama gets my vote (okay, he already was getting it) for not being afraid to embrace a different environmental and energy policy position so long as it has safeguards.

That so noted, his calls for dipping into the strategic petroleum reserve and a windfall profits tax on oil companies are pandering and dumb ideas at that, although his new TV ad linking McCain to Big Oil is welcome and his energy plan in the aggregate is focused in the right areas. That would be alternative energy development and not merely expanding drilling opportunities for big political contributors that will have a modest payoff in a decade or so.

Photograph by Jae C. Hong/The Associated Press

  • Swatty
    Why do you say TWO unpopular wars? Most Americans are still very much interested in getting justice for those who died on 9/11.

    As far as the polls, how exactly are they being conducted, especially considering the number of people that no longer have landlines?
  • vwcat
    Summer. This is so obvious and yet, everyone is wondering why. It is frustrating to hear people wondering because it is simply a fact that people are grilling out rather then watching what is going on the race.
    I don't think race is all that big. I think it's always going to be a certain percent but, not overwhelming.
    what you have is a media that does 75% negative stories on Obama. And anything showing something to correct them they ignore.
    For the press, they still carry a torch for McCain. They ignore much.
    But, with Obama, it's always complaining and talking about what problem Obama has in their pea sized brains that day.
  • elrod
    The reason I take heart after these McCain attacks is that the attacks themselves aren't all that devastating. OK, so if we concede that Obama is a "celebrity" with lots of fawning admirers, does that - ipso facto - mean he is "unable to lead?" Hardly. It's a fair strategy to pull him down a notch and go after his ego. But having a politician be a celebrity is neither unprecedented nor particularly troublesome to the country that elected Ronald Reagan. It's a pretty minor hit overall.

    I agree that the important thing is to get into a substantive tete-a-tete. McCain just doesn't understand domestic issues very much.

    But the key for Obama is to make this election more about the failures of the GOP than about Obama himself. What McCain has done successfully lately - with Obama's assistance - is to make this a referendum on Obama. That won't necessarily doom Obama, but it's a risky strategy. Obama needs to start defining McCain by:

    1) Driving home the point that McCain is just not substantively different from Bush and the rest of the GOP.

    2) Remind voters of all the flip-flops and gaffes made by McCain; raise doubts about his mental fitness and his supposed maverick tendencies.

    3) Make this point clear: Staying the course with the GOP is far riskier than change.
  • shaun
    Swatty:

    I don't think any wars are popular, but the war in Afghanistan is especially problematic.

    The post 9/11 U.S.-led invasion was supposed to take out the Al Qaeda leadership and topple its patron, the Taliban. The invasion was under resourced, poorly planned from a tactical standpoint and was in one of the least governable and most disorderly nations on earth. There was some minor success against AQ, but the Bush administration like the Clinton administration before it, kept pulling its punches instead of going in for the big kill. The Taliban were briefly suppressed but along with the AQ leadership found safe haven in the tribal regions of Pakistan with the approval of the duplicitous Musharraf, who deftly balanced his thirst for billions in U.S. aid with domestic considerations.

    Nearly seven years on, AQ is re-emergent and the rag-tag Taliban are still giving the under resourced U.S. and NATO contingents fits. There simply can't be major troop increases before those troops would have to come out of Iraq.

    And on top of that, Afghanistan is playing footsie with India, Pakistan's arch enemy.

    All of that adds up to one big unpopular war.
  • Swatty,
    You're sort of right. A majority of Americans still support the war in Afghanistan approx. 60%-40% http://www.pollingreport.com/afghan.htm
  • Marlowecan
    A very good post from Shaun. His 2nd key point, I think, is particularly V. important.

    Point 1: "McCain should be kicking Obama’s ass in the polls, but his numbers are pretty much stagnant and have not moved appreciably as a result of a series of highly publicized smears"

    Transparent pushback, reversing the obvious question of "Why isn't Obama dominant?" given this is a Democratic year+unpopular GOP prez+massive money advantage+media crush on Obama (when McCain makes the cover of "People" I will be willing to listen to silly arguments about the MSM love for McCain). Valueless except as political red-meat.

    Point 2: "I had another thought while chilling over the weekend: When is the last time you heard or read fresh thinking from a conservative who worships at the Republican altar? The answer, of course, is that it’s been a very long time..."

    This is a VERY important point, I would argue. Shaun is the first pundit I have read who has noticed this!

    I am reminded of a memoir I read by a GOP appointee in 1992 . . . talking about the torpor of that election year, and the fact the GOP - after years of success - had run out of ideas.
    The Bush campaign that year was running on intellectual fumes. They deserved to be removed from office.

    McCain's campaign seems much the same, to be honest. I am willing to be persuaded otherwise . . . but I have not seen policy innovation or new ideas a la Reagan or Gingrinch.
    Obama -- though one may disagree with him -- offers innovation.

    I feel this is a serious problem with the McCain campaign. But maybe it is just me.

    Anyhow, I think Shaun has hit on a important point here. McCain needs new conservative ideas and thinking desperately.
  • superdestroyer
    Senator Obama would have a huge lead if he was not trying to hold onto as much of the tradiational Democratic coalition as possible. For all the talk of flip flopping asn being conservatives, he still campaigns on giving the teachers unions, unions in general, the public sector employees, and militant blacks whatever they want. Senator Obama is only asking for sacrifice from middle and upper middle class whites.

    And yes, the Republicans have run out of ideas because there is not a single Republican politician who seems willing to give up pork barrel spending and personal privilege in order to implement any conservative ideas. When Ted Stevens was left as the senior Republican on the appropriations committee, the Republicans were surrendering any credibility they used to have.
  • shaun
    Marlowecan:

    Thank you.

    I read Ross Douthat regularly because he does have fresh conservative ideas.

    Link:

    http://rossdouthat.theatlantic.com/
  • Swatty
    While all that is true, it doesn't change the fact that more Americans are still for the war in Afghanistan. It's only the Iraq war that the mood has changed.
  • Marlowecan
    Shaun, you're welcome. Thanks for the link, btw.

    SD said: "there is not a single Republican politician who seems willing to give up pork barrel spending and personal privilege in order to implement any conservative ideas."

    This is very true, SD. The GOP on the Hill under Hastert were disgusting pigs at the trough. There is a lot of anger, it seems, among the grassroots about this. The fattest GOP pigs have, alas, all retired to their Great Country Club Trough . . . knowing there is a slaughter in the works.

    McCain might win . . . who knows? But I expect GOP voters will have their vengeance on the Hill for the "Years of Pork and Privilege".
  • Swatty,
    The opinion is shifting to a negative view of the Afghanistan occupation, but it's moving much more slowly than on Iraq.

    __________
    [Obama] still campaigns on giving the teachers unions, unions in general, the public sector employees, and militant blacks whatever they want.


    Seriously? "Militant blacks"? How are we supposed to take that any other way than as racist?
  • Silhouette
    The Summer's got nothin' on the Fall of discontent.

    ******

    "It’s mid summer and few voters are giving the campaign the attention that the punditocracy is. That will change after Labor Day."

    *****

    And how...

    You clearly don't want to know the half of it...

    Which won't change a single pixel of its inevitability..
  • Neocon
    Yeah McCain is the dealer, Obama asked for ONE card. McCain pulled the race card from the bottom of the deck and gave it to Obama and when Obama laid down his hand he had 5 race cards and empty sleeves.

    He wins.
  • DLS
    Recently McCain has done well, admittedly being helped by Obama's recent big blunders. (I doubt you'll ever admit to those, Shaun.) And who says Afghanistan is an unpopular war? For that matter, normal people do not want us to flee Iraq, but exercise some measure of control and wipe out terrorist vermin on our exit. Distortion of Obama's frequent change or positions or clining to both sides of an issue doesn't aid you, either, Shaun. Also, spare us all fake racism charges.

    If it's any consolation, you're right about the GOP. I'm moved to think of what it must be like to be on an ocean out of sight out land without anyone on board knowing the first thing about navigation. That's the GOP these days.
  • DLS
    "Senator Obama would have a huge lead if he was not trying to hold onto as much of the tradiational Democratic coalition as possible."

    I'm on the road and can barely read anything on this malfunctioning machine but I can read this and have to say, it'sonly recently that Obama has started to act as a liberal Democrat appealing openly to traditional left-Dem special interests and views -- and deservedly suffering as a result from such blunders and statements that repel normal people (windfall profits tax, Demogrant energy credits, etc. -- typical vote-buying of the cheap Dem votes). Will he realize he is overreaching and retreat, at least keeping his mouth shut until after November? Will he next advocate support for illegitimate liberal judicial activism? To decent, normal Americans, that means "DQ!"
  • DLS
    "And yes, the Republicans have run out of ideas because there is not a single Republican politician who seems willing to give up pork barrel spending and personal privilege in order to implement any conservative ideas."

    That's the kind of "Republicans" or "moderates" or "centrists" (me-too Dem Lites) that the left will Tolerate [tm] but will never vote for in an election when they can get the real thing, with real, full-power goodies from government instead.

    Will it or won't it be a Dem tsunami (seismic sea wave, for those Dems who believe this has to do with the tides) this year? More like, what size tsunami?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC