An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Vanity, Thy Name is Krauthammer

It’s all part of the Republican Smear Machine’s ongoing efforts to brand/label Obama. Hillary helped out during the primaries, desperately trying to make the case that he isn’t ready to be president, but the Republicans are on to the next stage of the game.

The Rev. Wright story had some staying power, though Obama diffused it both with his brilliant speech on race and by effectively distancing himself from his former pastor. With McCain running on his experience, as if being around a long time is qualification enough to be president, the Republicans are, like Hillary before them, arguing that Obama is unprepared. Which should be a worry for Obama. Whatever McCain’s actual record and policy positions, the media have accepted his claim that he has what it takes to be commander-in-chief from the get-go, what with his “experience” in national security and foreign policy. And the American people, fed by these media, are still buying it.

But the Republican effort is actually much simpler than that, because, as with Republican efforts past, it’s mostly about straightforward character assassination. Obama is a tougher target than, say, Dukakis, but the smears are flying: Obama is an elitist. Obama is an egotist. And now, via Krauthammer (in yesterday’s WaPo), Obama is an audaciously vain lover of self. Why? Because he wanted to speak at Berlin’s Brandenburg Gate (he’s speaking elsewhere, by the way) even though he’s done nothing to deserve it (unlike, say, Reagan, in Krauthammer’s estimation). And because he has an “elevated opinion of himself,” because his campaign is all about himself (not the people: ‘I,’ not ‘we’), because he immodestly thinks of himself as a saviour, as Jesus-plus. Or so says Krauthammer.

All of which is nonsense, of course. Obama has a high opinion of himself, to be sure, but most politicians do — and certainly anyone seriously running for president must be confident that he or she has what it takes, that he or she can look in the mirror every morning and say, “Yes, I want to be president.” There is always the worry that self-promotion can cross the line into narcissism, or that popularity can breed a cult of personality, but Obama, despite a few minor missteps (talking about Whole Foods and arugula in Iowa, the stupid quasi-presidential seal, etc.) has been admirably modest even while being swept up in a wave of enthusiastic support and victory — even while turning into, and leading, what has become a massive grassroots movement to reform American politics.

Of course, some of it, much of it, is about Obama himself. He’s the candidate running for elected office, after all. But the “we” is not royal, as Krauthammer suggests, changing pronouns and taking Obama out of context, focusing on the line “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for” while missing Obama’s meaning altogether. As Hilzoy puts it: “It’s about the need to take action for oneself, rather than waiting for saviors to parachute in and do it for us.” Obama wasn’t saying, “I’m the one,” he was saying, “We, with me as your candidate, we together…”

But Krauthammer keeps pressing his case: “Americans are beginning to notice Obama’s elevated opinion of himself. There’s nothing new about narcissism in politics. Every senator looks in the mirror and sees a president. Nonetheless, has there ever been a presidential nominee with a wider gap between his estimation of himself and the sum total of his lifetime achievements?”

One name comes to mind (as it does for Hilzoy): George W. Bush. Think “Mission Accomplished.” Think the Second Inaugural, where he presented himself as the spreader of freedom and democracy and the liberator of the world’s oppressed masses. Think “I’m the decider.” Think how he has been turned into a Christ-like figure by some of his supporters, and how he has bought into it.

But if it’s immodesty, vanity, and narcissism you’re looking for, how about Krauthammer himself? What does he do but pontificate without expertise in newspaper columns and on the Sunday talk shows, dishing out partisan hackery and vicious smears without ever being held to account?

The Republican Smear Machine will keep churning out its attacks, of course. And Krauthammer and his ilk will be there to spread the word.

(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)

  • mw
    Hey Michael - Quick question. I was wondering if you can point to any post that you have ever written at any time, when you you have had the opportunity to use the phrase "Democratic Smear Machine"? Seeing how you used the phrase "Republican Smear Machine" twice in this one post, I was just - you know - curious. If you can't tell me, no problem - I think I know the answer.

    It is is little "tells" like this that help me calibrate bloggers and pundits I read. I like to know exactly where to put them on the PPH (Polarizing Partisan Hack) scale. Thanks.
  • Davebo
    It is is little "tells" like this that help me <strike>calibrate bloggers and pundit</strike> ignore the content of the post and instead launch into irrelevant inanities.
  • runasim
    Well, Rove is back!! Nuff said.

    DWSUWF,
    Were any ot the smears in this post fabricated?
  • notademanymore
    Krauthammer has been praised and condemned, depending on one’s viewpoint, as a “liberal,” a “conservative,” and a “neoconservative.” He is one of those rare columnists who has managed to cheese off everyone at some time or another. He has worked in various capacities with Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, and George W. Bush. He is pro-Bush concerning the Iraq war, but opposes Bush in many other areas. He supports of legalized abortion; opposes the death penalty; is a critic of intelligent design theory; and opposed the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

    If I could write as well as he does maybe then I would criticize him but I can't...maybe others should look at all sides of a person before criticizing...or does everyone just attack then ask questions after the fact?
  • Neocon
    Charles Krauthammer appears on FOX News. Thats all the left needs to go off on rants about a rather moderate non politician.
  • jay1949
    If you knew anything about Krauthammer, you would know he is his own person, he reaches his own conclusions, he says what he means and he means what he says. The "Republican Attack Machine" is no less a myth than the "Democratic Attack Machine," but if it were real, Krauthammer is not part of it. Finally, you are inaccurate concerning Obama's use of the royal "we;" I have heard him use it, when referring solely to himself, on many occasions and in many contexts.
  • Jim_Satterfield
    Sorry, folks. Krauthammer is as Republican as they come in spite of these would be defenders. And I read the column. It is as pathetic as Michael makes it sound. And as pathetic as these people calling Krauthammer some kind of independent are.
  • Berynice
    Yes, because as we all know, FOX news is awash with moderate commentators. Downright middle of the road they are.
  • mw
    Yes, and as we all know, the only correct moderate view is unquestioning support of a Democratic Party House of Representatives with a 100 seat majority, combined with a Democratic Party Senate with a 60-40 filibuster proof majority, and led by a Democratic Party President with 95% toe-the-line Democratic Party voting record resulting in the single most concentrated unobstructed power in one party and one man in 70 years.

    Any other view is clearly the work of the Republican Smear Machine.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC