An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

William Kristol on McCain’s “Fixer-Upper”

In his much-awaited, Monday New York Times column, William Kristol for a change focuses his attention on something that badly needs attention, and lots of work: McCain‘s fixer-upper campaign.

Just like all of us every week anticipate great things from Kristol’s Monday column, so does Kristol from “Murphy” in “Where is Murphy.”

But, who is Murphy? Kristol tells us:

“Murphy” is Mike Murphy, the 46-year-old G.O.P. strategist who masterminded John McCain’s 2000 primary race against George Bush, helping McCain come close to pulling off an amazing upset. Murphy was then chief strategist for Mitt Romney’s successful Massachusetts governor run in 2002.

And what about Murphy? Kristol believes and hopes that Murphy, a friend of his, will soon join McCain’s campaign…as Chief Strategist.

But, why Murphy? According to Kristol:

As observers of the 2000 effort know, he has a deep rapport with McCain — including an ability to tell him when he’s made a mistake. He’s a creative campaign tactician and an imaginative ad maker — but his great skill has always been an ability to find a clear theme for his candidates, as he did for McCain in 2000, who ran then as a conservative reformer and champion of national greatness.

As I said, for a change Kristol focuses on real issues–instead of, for example, unfoundedly bashing some MoveOn TV ad–and, also for a change, shares some facts with us:

[McCain] understands that his campaign has failed to develop an overarching message. Above all, McCain is painfully aware that he is being diminished by his own campaign.

…Obama has achieved the important feat, as the campaign has moved on, of seeming an increasingly plausible president. McCain seems a less plausible president today than he did when he clinched the nomination.

And, “The McCain campaign this year desperately needs a message and a narrative that is both appropriate for the candidate and for the times.”

So Kristol hopes that Murphy, who, according to Kristol, told a New York Times reporter, that “’the depressingly self-absorbed McCain campaign machine needs to get out of the way” of its candidate, will really shake things up.

Kristol concludes:

With Murphy in charge, McCain will have the campaign team he wants. Then all they’ll have to do is come from behind to win against a superior organization, more money, a gifted candidate and a Democratic-tilting electorate. Oh well: no challenge, no glory.

Wow! A couple more facts from Kristol.

And then there is “Murphy’s Law.”

  • Neocon
    See Maxine Waters threaten to Socialize the Oil industries.Watch this link…..dont be turned off that it is Fox news. It is her speaking in congress.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUaY3LhJ-IQ

    If this kind of stuff does not fire up conservatives then they are indeed a dead party and its time for a third party to become the next party.

    GOP>>>>>>RIP
  • Silhouette
    Look for the "McCain Limp" to continue until after Obama is nominated formally.

    McCain's best shot at the Oval Office is to do everything he can right now to make Obama seem electable in spite of all evidence, knowledge and intuition to the opposite.

    Look for his posture and image to straighten and take off like gangbusters once unwary democrats pass the point of no return.

    Remember in September, you heard it here first in July. You will say then, "I wish we would've listened then." Trust me, this is exactly what is coming. I'd bet the bank on it.

    The Obama Trap.
  • ljeff18
    Here's a little clip about the Lincoln Club of Orange County stopping their contributions to incumbent Repubicans as a sign to them that change in party leadership is needed.
    http://www.greenfaucet.com/hanlons-pub/proud-to...
    Pretty interesting..
  • aba23
    Mr. Murphy may be every bit as talented as advertised, but his wondrous powers didn't help McCain in the 2000 primary when he faced a candidate who better connected with voters, was backed enthusiastically by his party (and its main financiers), and had money to burn (and, for the Silhouettes out there, a reputation exceeded his accomplishments). Maybe the second time'll be the charm. So I guess I'm agreeing with Kristol, ugh.
  • CitizenKang
    Is this Kristol you speak of the same one who back in 2003 was predicting such glories for the Iraq war?

    And if so, am I to understand the nation's "paper of record" has given this discredited person a weekly forum?

    Surely you jest.

    (And I promise to stop calling you Shirley)

    ;-)
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Hate to surprise you and disappoint you at the same time, CitizenKang, but, yes, the 2003 Kristol who "predicted such glories in Iraq" is the same one who now has a "much-awaited", once-a-week, Monday column in The Times. Perhaps (or shirley) the Times needs a Ted Baxter on their staff.



    Now, don't ask me how he managed thatdis
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC