From Poland’s Gazeta Wyborcza: Americans Must Show More Concern for Polish Security

What’s really behind Poland’s hesitation about hosting key elements of America’s anti-missile shield?

Pawel Wronski writes for Poland’s Gazeta Wyborcza:

“History – both recent and distant – weighs on Poland’s decision on whether to allow the installation of the anti-missile shield. … Whether these threats are realistic or not – from the point of view of Polish history it’s reasonable to act with caution. …
In terms of more recent history, one recalls our unconditional participation in the Iraq War alongside the Americans and in the consequent stabilization mission. Poland suffered considerable political losses, the benefits were negligible and moral doubts remain. Any politician who would, after such experiences, consent to erect the shield in Poland – a rather unpopular mover among the people – had better have good arguments for it.”

By Pawel Wronski

Translated By Halszka Czarnocka

July 5, 2008

Poland – Gazeta Wyborcza – Original Article (Polish)

History – both recent and distant – weighs on Poland’s decision on whether to allow the installation of the anti-missile shield.

Distant history, when Prime Minister Tusk talks of reinforcing guarantees of Poland’s security in face of our neighbors’ threats in regard to the shield. [Reference to Russia].

Whether these threats are realistic or not – from the point of view of Polish history it’s reasonable to act with caution.

In terms of more recent history, one recalls our unconditional participation in the Iraq War alongside the Americans and in the consequent stabilization mission. Poland suffered considerable political losses, the benefits were negligible and moral doubts remain.

Any politician who would, after such experiences, consent to erect the shield in Poland – a rather unpopular mover among the people – had better have good arguments for it. To help an ally is important, but Poles will ask what has been done for the security of their country.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the ongoing controversy over the U.S. anti-missile shield.