An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Enviromental Extremism Partly To Blame For Fires

fires.jpg

For the past couple of weeks I have been spending more and more time inside as the air outside has gotten worse and worse. Looking into gray skies caused by literally hundreds of fires all over Northern California caused me to take a look at the causes of these fires.

Of course the primary cause of the fires was a freak thunderstorm that produced hundreds of lightning strikes. Also at fault was an unusually dry spring (one of the driest on record). But there is a deeper cause which allowed for the buildup of tons of fuel for this fire to grab hold of.

The dirty little secret that everyone wants to ignore is that another significant factor is the hard line enviromental movement. Just as they have contributed to higher energy and gas prices by fighting the building of any new refineries, they have also blocked reasonable efforts to protect against fires.

As outlined in the San Jose Mercury News recently, homeowners who have tried to clear the area around their homes have found those efforts burdened by these groups. One homeowner, named Mary Lou Samms, wanted to remove some trees that posed a threat but learned she would have to spend potentially thousands of dollars for a ‘biotic review’ to make sure that she did not harm a federally protected salamander and manzanita shrub.

Samms does not have a problem with taking care of the enviroment but at the same time she would like to make sure her home is safe from fire. In this case the restrictions were such that she was not able to clear the land and as a result her house is gone. Also gone are any of the plants or animals that were supposedly protected by the laws.

Like Samms I am all for a balanced enviromental program. But there is some middle ground between letting C. Montgomery Burns build condos on Lake Tahoe and what we have now.

It is time for a change.

  • JSpencer
    Amusing how you take the opportunity to toss the blame for high gas prices at the environmentalists in the course of talking about the CA fires. Actually it's more ironic than it is amusing. By all means, remove the fuel for fire when it's necessary, but why use this as an excuse to mischaracterize environmentalists in general? This reminds me of the poll I just read showing how more folks now imagine they can drill their way out of this and prefer that "solution" to conservation. Hey, nobody wants to face the music, better to pass the problem on to the next generation eh? The short view rules! And oh yeah, about the fires? Sure, get rid of the extra fuel, but don't imagine droughts and lightning will ever stop, and don't imagine CA is going to stop having water problems either. Hmmm... maybe we can find a way to blame the environmentalists for those things too?
  • runasim
    I guess one way to prevent forest fires would be to remove forests. Then gas prices would plummet immediately, never to rise again,

    On a sensible level, I do agree that envionmentalists have been too unwilling to compromise, just like developers have been. The clash between expanding human habitation areas and preservation of the environment is occuring all over the world, not just in CA. Birds and fish are dying because they swallow the plastic with which oceans are polluted. We have to re-think how we live, if our progeny are to survive.

    But even in CA, deforestation to make room for houses, causes landslides. Are environmenatlists to blame for that, too?

    We need cooperation and innovative ways to deal with conflicting needs, not just finger pointing. As the world's population increases and resources decrease, we have to stop and think how to deal with that.
    Maybe more of everything is not always the answer.
  • The entire west is in severe drought. Warm winters combined with drought have created a blight of disease that kills trees and makes them more flammable. The fires will get worse. Far worse. If you conservatives see a way to remove all the dead trees and preserve your precious tax cuts, propose away. Whether or not the "environmentalists" (and thousands of scientists) are right that carbon and climate change are connected, the drought is real and the West is burning. What a fantasy to think that reducing the numbers of trees on a lot from 50 to 20 would stop these fires in their tracks!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC