While I pretty much expected it, I still felt a frisson of disappointment. I admit it. It’s not a piece of legislation I could ever support. Greenwald has it right, I think.
At TPM, Greg Sargent says tersely, ‘Obama’s statement on the FISA “compromise” is in, and suffice it to say that it won’t make opponents of the Dem cave-in very happy. He’s supporting it.’ He’s set out Obama’s statement. Sargent finds it a ‘downer.’
“Obama's support for this bill is great… for me to poop on! I keed, I keed.” – Triumph the Insult Comic Dog
Very mature and thoughtful analysis, Chris.
I'm sure it will be a great contirbution in Nov.
It's been a rough week here in mid-Mich. The news of Obama's support for the FISA “compromise” doesn't make it any better.
Well let's see… President Bush has been expanding his powers for the past seven years. Now that Bush is on his way out the door the Dems in Congress will pass this bill that Bush wants… thereby cementing power for the next president….. no wonder the Dems and Obama want to support it…
I am disappointed in Obama on this.
So, Greenwald equates intelligence gathering activities to the Holocaust, and this is seen as a valid comparison.
Sheesh.
He's full of it and so are the other childish whiners (filled with Bush hatred).
“Law-breaking telecoms” (rightly shielded from junk lawsuits)?
“(B) the subject of a written request or directive . . . indicating that the activity was (i) authorized by the President; and (ii) determined to be lawful.”
Some folks still won't get it, long after it's come knocking on their foreheads.