An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

All the Bigotry That’s Fit to Post at John McCain’s Website

AMERICAblog’s John Aravosis has a fantastic (and invaluable) post up today examining some of the bigotry that can be found at McCain’s website — and it’s pretty revealing.

Entering search terms like “fag,” “bitch,” and “Jew,” he found a discussion thread on whether or not Obama is the anti-Christ (including a comment suggesting that the anti-Christ is “an apostate Jew”), comments calling Obama “a Muslim fag” and the Quran “the Muslim book of hate,” a reference to the “Jewish TV and press” (this commenter would support McCain if not for the fact that McCain has the support of Lieberman, Kissinger, and the allegedly Jewish media), a claim that Obama harbours “deep resentment toward whites,” and other anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli sentiment (including the charge that McCain is committing treason by “[answering] to AIPAC and Israel”).

Now, to be fair, this bigotry was posted not by the McCain campaign, let alone by McCain himself, but by non-affiliated commenters at the McCain website. And we bloggers often find such bigotry in the comments sections to our posts, and I’ve certainly had my fair share. (I won’t comment here on TMV policy, but over at my place, The Reaction, I delete most of it, with a note that I’ve done so, but I also keep some of it up, with my own comments in response, to serve as an instructive reminder of the sort of hate-speech (and hate generally) with which we must contend.)

But this is different. McCain’s website isn’t a blog (although it includes a blog), it’s his campaign’s primary online presence. And his campaign, presuming it’s paying attention, could either have deleted the bigoted comments or at least responded to them (as I and other bloggers and blog-moderators do). “It’s interesting to note that each comment has a ‘flag as offensive’ button next to it, so that readers can inform the moderator that the comments are offensive,” John points out. “Either McCain’s readers don’t find any of this offensive, or McCain’s staff was informed and didn’t care.”

Either way, it seems that McCain’s website — www.johnmccain.com — is not just his campaign’s primary online presence but an outlet for straight-talkin’ bigotry.

(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)

  • elrod
    I'd be careful about opening that can of worms. Campaign blogs can be opened by anybody, included "trolls" who want to make them look bad. Consider the "New Black Panther Party" blog on Obama's site. That was almost definitely put there by an opponent of Obama.

    Perhaps these blogs should be moderated - like Moderate Voice. But if they aren't, there's no way to hold McCain accountable for wackos on his site.
  • runasim
    You missed the first act, I think.
    The revelation about McCains's website came after days of blog postings about what's on Obama's website.
    Searching McCain's website was a defense and retalition move.

    When there are community blogs on which anybody can post, anybody and his crazy brother will post.

    I don't know if it's even a good idea to enter into comparative bigotry wars among anonoymous bloggers not representing candidates.
  • Neocon
    Right. I agree with runasim

    Plus I havent been banned here yet, which Im not sure what that means but its bound to mean something
  • Marlowecan
    Elrod's caution is wise.

    Aravosis' post was basically retalitation after conservative bloggers noted not very nice pieces about Jews - notably "How the Jewish Lobby works" - that someone had stuck up on Obama's site.

    When this became news, it was immediately pulled down by admins.

    Some liberal bloggers contended it was a Repub plot...just as this could be the work of some Democratic provocateurs.

    Elrod's caveat is well-taken. We will see a lot more of this as the "Guilt by Association" election heats up. I wonder which site will host the first posts-comments from the NorthAmericanManBoyLoveAssociation or the KKK?

    Odd to think that TMV can be moderated, but not these candidates' web presence.
  • runasim
    'Some liberal bloggers contended it was a Repub plot...just as this could be the work of some Democratic provocateurs'
    -------------

    One techie claimed most of it came from one website, i.e. one person, who often does these cut and paste operations across the blogosphere under different names.
    The Internet can get ugly.
  • Slamfu
    We are not seriously blaming McCain for things people coming to his website are saying are we?
  • I'm with elrod. Yet, some prominent bloggers and talking heads on TV (e.g. Bill O'Reilly) will lay the responsibility at the feet of the heads of those websites, e.g. Barack Obama or, for the personal enemy of Big O, Ariana Huffington.
  • StockBoySF
    I'm with elrod too. We shouldn't blame McCain (or Obama) for 3rd party postings that appear on their websites. I would hope that those postings are appropriately handled as quickly as possible. I think if a campaign consistently takes a few days to pull these sorts of postings down, then there might be concern. While the internet is open to everyone, it doesn't excuse a campaign from forgoing reasonable (and responsible) precautions/editing. And until the requirements are better understood by the campaigns, we should give McCain's and Obama's websites the benefit of a doubt.

    If there's a bigoted thread on a campaign website, I would hope that someone from that campaign would step in and say that such language is not tolerated on that web site. I don't know if it can be done from a technical standpoint but perhaps if certain words, i.e. as fag or anti-christ, could be flagged so that as soon as they are posted a notification is sent to the campaign, then someone from the campaign website (maybe a webmaster of sorts?) can log in and state that those comments are not acceptable.

    And if there are a dozen comments and the campaign says such language is not appreciated, then I would hope no further comments are posted, but if they continue to be then the campaign should respond further and shut down the thread, if necessary.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC