An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Recession, Heck. It’s A Regression

Experts are having a hard time pinning a label on the present American economy. It still has a few too many positive elements to fall into the traditional recession category. But it’s far too weak to be just a very mild expansion. And it doesn’t have the requisite combination of recessionary and inflationary markers to be tagged stagflation.

Perhaps we need a new name for this strange beast. Perhaps when all the factors are considered, it might best be called “a regression.”

What’s happening to our national economy today isn’t just another one of those inevitable economic dips in the business cycle that always come along after an expansion that has gone on too long, a recession. What’s happening now is a symptom of something far more fundamental and worrisome—an expression of genuine economic decline. A regression.

We’re regressing vis-a-vis the rest of the world in many crucial respects. These include infrastructure growth and maintenance regressions compared to countries such as Japan, and the development and implementation of new technologies such as solar compared to a country such as Germany.

Compared to the dragons of Asia, we’re also regressing in terms of education. And when it comes to the best-health-care-for-dollars-spent, we’re regressing compared to dozens of other countries around the world. Our national debt situation makes us ever more dependent on foreign lenders. While our currency, long foolishly manipulated to increase exports, is regressing in value compared with sounder currencies, and this in turn has led to a regression in our influence with petroleum suppliers such as the Saudis.

Respect for our Federal Reserve is regressing compared to other central banks because of the Fed’s short-sighted policies to promote economic growth at the expense of long-term fiscal responsibility. The reputation of our private banking institutions is similarly regressing because they have come to be viewed as slick peddlers of derivative products that their foreign customers now regard as little better than shell games.

We’re not only regressing vis-a-vis the rest of the world in economic terms, we’re rapidly regressing in terms of our own economic past. Our people owe more and pay more on old debts than ever before. We work longer and harder than any other people on the planet and still have seen an overall slide in average standards of living in recent decades. The benefits of added productivity haven’t trickled down, they’ve flooded up, generating an enormous equity regression.

You can grow out of a recession with interest rate cuts and one-time government giveaways. You can only begin to redirect a regression with fundamental policy changes at the government level that reflect a better understanding of economic realities among Americans generally.

Are such changes possible in today’s America? Yes, but they will take time to take hold. And until then, the great slide, our national economic regression, will continue.

  • RememberNovember
    It's very simple- we are replacing the old USSR. Look at the expense they put into Afghanistan in their 10-year crusade.
  • mikkel
    I agree, in the best case scenario there is going to be about $3 trillion of credit contraction. If things get bad that could be closer to $1-$2 trillion in loses, which would be at least $10 trillion in credit contraction.

    Our society runs completely on credit and as it goes away, we're going to have to live within our means, and I see no possible way to keep a global military presence. If we do, that'll lead to hyperinflation and a complete collapse.
  • Rambie
    Good point Nov, the war is what, a billion dollar expense per month of our budget., but there are more stones weighing down our economy than just the war and I think Michael has touched on them.

    I think regression is a good term for our situation.

    - "Tickle down" economics never seen to trickle down too far and spark the growth they should.
    - Our financial & federal reserve institutions don't have the respect of foreign investment as they did in the past
    - We continue to work harder for less.

    There is going to be more pressure on our economy as oil prices continue to rise.

    We should be investing more into research and infrastructure changes to move away from fossil fuels. This should have been done back in the 70's with the last "energy crisis" but for many reasons the ball was dropped.
  • superdestroyer
    Of course, on a so-called moderate blog, I see no mention of the effects of immigration, differing birthrates, the expansion of the nanny state as possible causes.

    I guess in the progressive world, every problem has to be define in such a way that only the government can solve the problem and the problem requires an expansion of the government.
  • ljeff18
    If you think the economy is bad, wait to make a final judgement in November.
    McCain and Obama will make very different economic decisions that will affect the country long after their tenure ends.

    The economy will take a hit if Obama is elected. In addition to changes to capital gains tax policy, Obama and the Democrats will slowly chip away at the economy, making huge economic changes with small seemingly innocent policy changes.

    This article: http://www.greenfaucet.com/hanlons-pub/obama-it...

    Really points out what could happen to the economy if Democrats take over the White House. California is still paying for what their Dem govenor did years ago..
    I'd hate to see that happen to the entire country.. as we fall further behind the rest of the world.
    Regression it is.
  • yetanothermoderatevoice
    Nicely put Michael, although many of the long term structural factors you mention have been around for a long time, and yet the U.S. continued to grow vibrantly, so I'm not sure if the chickens are now coming home to roost.

    leff: The link you mention would be better if it compared how the economy has *actually* done under Democrat versus Republican administrations. The answer may surprise you (it surprised me).

    http://angrybear.blogspot.com/2007/06/comparing...

    superdestroyer: "Of course, on a so-called moderate blog, I see no mention of the effects of immigration, differing birthrates, the expansion of the nanny state as possible causes. "

    I think they *are* worth mentioning, but IIRC the answers are murky. For example, Canada and Singapore routinely trounce the U.S. in education scores for high schoolers, but have (near) universal healthcare, so it is difficult to sort out the effect of education policies, immigration policies, nanny statism, etc.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC