An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

New voters storm into the system

Happy as the Republicans may be with their recent voter ID victories, they might want to rethink their strategy in light of yesterdays news that more than 3.5 million new voters registered in the first three months of the year.

Many of us believe those Voter ID laws are clearly intended to block the vote — if not, why not advocate, instead, Rick Hasen’s suggestion that we affirmatively, pro-actively register everyone? With an opt-out provision of course.

But the news yesterday makes it look to me like no matter what they throw at us (and in Indiana, they got game) they’re not going to slow this thing down:

Voter excitement, always up before a presidential election, is pushing registration through the roof so far this year — with more than 3.5 million people rushing to join in the historic balloting, according to an Associated Press survey that offers the first national snapshot.

Figures are up for blacks, women and young people. Rural and city. South and North.

Overall, the AP found that nearly one in 65 adult Americans signed up to vote in just the first three months of the year. And in the 21 states that were able to provide comparable data, new registrations have soared about 64 percent from the same three months in the 2004 campaign.

Those voters are bound to turn some Red States Blue:

Cherie Poucher, director of elections in Wake County, home of the state capital of Raleigh, said registrations among the parties have historically kept pace with each other — until this year. In the two weeks before the April 11 registration deadline, she said, the Democrats gained about 8,000 voters in Wake County while the GOP lost several hundred.

“We have never seen something like that before,” Poucher said.

In Pennsylvania, where Clinton’s victory in the April 22 primary kept her campaign alive, there were 40,000 more Republicans than Democrats in Bucks County in April 2004.

Among the new registrants in the first three months of this year, 6,537 signed up as Democrats while 2,200 did so as members of the GOP in the county north of Philadelphia. And 12,554 filed applications to switch to the Democratic Party. By the beginning of April, Bucks had become a Democratic county by a margin of nearly 4,000 registered voters.

Cordisco said party leaders had initially set a goal of turning the county blue by 2011. Then came the extended primary battle that gave Pennsylvania an important role. And while Clinton won Bucks County by a margin of 25 percentage points, accounts suggest that many of the new registrants are black voters inspired by Obama.

Superdelegates, are you listening?

Among the new voters in North Carolina is Shy Ector, 25, of Durham. She favored Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry while a student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill four years ago, but never actually took the time to make sure she was registered to vote. Barack Obama’s candidacy was enough to make sure she did this year, she said.

“I was like ‘Oh, now this is a reason to vote. This is different,’” Ector said. “I was inspired and I was excited.”

New voters are generally less reliable. So there’s no guarantee this year’s newcomers will stick around in years to come — or even cast ballots in November if their candidate doesn’t make it.

“I will be very disappointed, and it will take me some time to recover,” Ector said of an Obama loss to Hillary Rodham Clinton. “I’m not going to say I’m just going to write off politics for good, but it does make you feel like you’re doing all this work for nothing, and nothing’s coming to fruition.”

Even if some discouraged new voters drop off, the numbers are striking.

Er, and I’d say, we’ve only begun to fight!

  • superdestroyer
    Making sure everyone is register and everyone votes will just ensure that the Democratic Party becomes the one, dominant party faster. Why not ask the 20 somethings what they would think of politics with only one political party. We already know that blacks are very comfortable in a one party system with few real choices. Is that what the left is promising for everyone else.

    The real question is whether a system where the Democratic primary is the only real election and the election is over special interest pandering will be the best for the U.S?
  • PaulSilver
    Thanks for this post. It never occurred to me to consider bypassing voter registration all together and the contentious baggage that comes with it.
    Just show up to vote using a fingerprint scanner to avoid duplication.

    I have never been convinced by superdestroyers concerns that we are heading towards a one party system. None of us agree on everything and no matter how effective we were are purifying the members of a group we would find some powerful issues to define our differences. Such is the Christian religion - One theme with myriad formats.
  • DLS
    Fingerprint scanner = Voter ID check = "disenfrancisement!" [sic] "blocking the vote!" [sic].
  • DLS
    Superdestroyer, just wait until the lefties like Nader get their victory and additional children (of still younger ages) are able to vote Democratic: lowering the voting age to sixteen has long been an extreme leftist objective, complete with emotive BS attached as baggage -- "If you're old enough to work, you're old enough to vote [Democratic or Green or otherwise dupe-leftist]!" I could see the radical "children's rights" crowd demanding a reduction in the voting age to thirteen (if not younger).
  • superdestroyer
    Paul,

    For political parties to be relevant, they have to be able to win enough elections to affect policy. Given the changing Demographics of the U.S., the open borders, and the push increase voter fraud on the part of the Democrats, the Republicans stand no chance of long term survival.

    So, then the idea is who will split off from the Democratic Party to support a second party. Do you really think that blacks, hispanics, and immigrants will really split off from the Democratic Party. A progressive party to the left of the Democratic Party would be as white as the Republican Party is today and just as irrelevant.
  • runasim
    The only concern I have about voter ID is that it does put a burden on the elderly and the disabled, etc. It's sort of like an unfunded mandate.

    The Supreme Court pooh-poohed this concern, but that's like pooh-poohing a wrongful conviction. It matters a wholle lot to those affected.

    If it really affects as few people as the proponents of ID claim, then there must be some rational way to deal with this.
    Through a voter registration fund?
    As part of SS benefits?
    Something?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC