An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Karl Rove To GOP: Cut The Stuff About “Hussein” Obama

How far has American political culture and talk radio veered out of control? So much that Karl Rove — yes THE Karl Rove who has demonized more than all the installments of “The Exorcist” put together — has told GOPers to cut it out. Marc Ambinder has this:

No less an authority figure than Karl Rove has warned Republican operatives from demagoguing Barack Obama’s middle name.

At a closed door meeting of GOP state executive directors in late January, Rove said the safest way to refer to Obama would be to use his honorific, “Sen. Obama.”

“The context was, you’re not going to stigmatize this guy. You shouldn’t underestimate him,” one of the executive directors said. Rove said that the use of “Barack Hussein Obama” would perpetuate the notion that Republicans were bigoted and would hurt the party.

Rove also said that Republicans should refer to Hillary Clinton as “Sen. Clinton,” rather than “Hillary.”

It’s hard to break from not just an ingrained political culture, but demonization and casting aspersions seem to provide psychological release to some folks (across the political spectrum, by the way). The attack/demonization mode releases frustrations, slaps “high concept” definitions on those with whom you disagree, puts opponents on the defensive, and is considered by some to be enjoyable and intelligent political debate.

But in realistic, political terms, in 2008 it’s not smart since there is indeed a new generation that may not like the Baby Boomer-influenced style of confrontational, innuendo-peppered, name-calling politics. And just who is Obama attracting to the polls? Younger voters. McCain, too, has traditionally appealed to younger voters. And what segment of the electorate must a party wants to win need to at least partially capture? Independent voters who aren’t into demonization.

It could be argued Rove was talking strictly as a political realist, and wasn’t expressing some newly dominant gene that suddenly made him a nicer guy. But the bottom line is that he’s saying “tread lightly and in fact don’t tread on that area.”

Will they listen? If you believe that, I can sell you THIS for $200.

  • Slamfu
    Rove is going to retire from the frontline and go civilian on us. He's already semi regular at the Times. My guess is he'll end up the Henry Kissinger of electioneering.

    "Hey, weren't you the guy that started all that ....."

    "Yea yea yea, but everyone respects me now for some reason."
  • Slamfu
    Time, not the Times.
  • DLS
    Karl Rove and Dick Morris, in Washington forever.
  • kritt11
    Karl is right about this one. He realizes that Rovian tactics aren't going to work against a candidate like Obama. The GOP already had the perception of being somewhat insensitive to minorities, and does not have enough registered voters to win if they alienate moderates and Indies. Rove is smart, because he saw that the media turned Clinton's negative attacks into latent racism, hurting her chances in South Carolina. If nothing else, he is capable of changing tactics.

    Karl may also have noticed the exodus of voters from the GOP, and realized many were tired of its angry, hate-filled rhetoric.
  • PaulSilver
    Thanks for this Joe,
    This afternoon I made an online contribution to McCain, even though my preference is for Obama or Clinton, to acknowledge his honorable leadership and example to the Conservative community. It makes my skin crawl to hear the hate, fear, and belligerence of too many of the champions of the right.
    I also make contributions to the Republican Leadership Council for the same reasons. I respect conservatism, just not the popular form of it.
  • templestark
    Easy for Karl Kissame Rove to say.

    By the way, WTF? It IS his middle name and so from either of the four "sides" what the hell is the deal? William Jefferson Clinton. Walker. Delano. Hussein is a fairly common name across a large swath of the world. BFD. Use it, it is his middle name and facts are scarce in this world.

    And by the way Hillary's middle name is Saddam, so really let's call it even 'kay? .... OK, it's really Diane but that's not funny is it?

    - Temple
  • StockBoySF
    Kritt, I think you've got it right. Nothing for me to add.
  • "It could be argued Rove was talking strictly as a political realist, and wasn’t expressing some newly dominant gene that suddenly made him a nicer guy"

    I don't think there is any doubt that this would be a hard argument to lose. If the "Hussein" name-calling was helping the Republican cause then Rove wouldn't be asking his party to back off. Instead, with the exception of the hardcore talk-radio crowd, everyone views this line of attack as being on par with the name-calling found in most elementary school cafeterias, and that may even be demeaning to some of the more creative schoolchildren. If this brand of childish name-calling continues then it will allow the Democrats to frame the election as one of a party that's serious about governing the country, and one that is a bunch of immature, bitter, and possibly racist obstructionists - that has got to be a nightmare scenario for the Republicans, who only fifteen years ago swept into Congress as the party of competence and ideas.

    Also, for those "arguing" that saying someone's middle name is no big deal, COME ON. EVERYONE sees through this line of attack - whenever a talk radio host says Barack HUSSEIN Obama (and they always emphasize the middle name), there is absolutely no one in this country who doesn't understand the allusion to certain Middle Eastern dictators that is being made. To illustrate with a counter-example, it's the same as if a left wing host always referred to the current Vice President by putting a strong emphasis on his first name; it would be stupid, insulting, and ultimately something that damages the speaker's credibility.
  • kritt11
    The intent of using Obama's middle name is obviously to smear him in the worst way possible, so I agree with Ryan that its ludicrous to say that its no big deal. Clinton was called Slick Willie- not William Jefferson Clinton by opponents, and who even knows the middle names of McCain or Hillary? If Obama's middle name was Franklin or Thomas- would Cunningham have repeated it incessantly? The right wing knows that there are some who are so ignorant that they believe that Obama is a Muslim and maybe more would think he's a terrorist with a middle name like Hussein.

    Also, its no accident that serial killers are called by all three of their names.
  • templestark
    Ted Bundy.
  • templestark
    Jeffrey Dahmer/
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice/Joe Gandelman | Designed by Elegant Themes | Customized by Tyrone Steels II/Enxit Group, LLC