An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

McCain, Obama: The Generation Chasm

After years of Bush’s would-be and as-if leadership, American voters are choosing authenticity, albeit with a 24-year age gap and a world of difference in personal history and mindset.

Of all the accusations that could, and likely will, be made against John McCain and Barack Obama, the least plausible will involve calculation and deceit.

Last night’s victory speeches laid out the broad outlines of their confrontation.

Turning Obama’s central theme against him, McCain said, “My hope for our country resides in my faith in the American character, the character which proudly defends the right to think and do for ourselves, but perceives self-interest in accord with a kinship of ideals, which, when called upon, Americans will defend with their very lives.

“To encourage a country with only rhetoric rather than sound and proven ideas that trust in the strength and courage of free people is not a promise of hope. It is a platitude.”

Against McCain’s message of traditional values, Obama offered a new approach: “This is what change looks like when it happens from the bottom up. And in this election, your voices will be heard.

“Because at a time when so many people are struggling to keep up with soaring costs in a sluggish economy, we know that the status quo in Washington just won’t do. Not this time. Not this year. We can’t keep playing the same Washington game with the same Washington players and expect a different result–because it’s a game that ordinary Americans are losing.”

This contest of new vs. old promises to feature civility and positive attitude from both candidates, although there will certainly be Rovian low blows from third-party fringes on both sides.

In stepping up to face each other, both candidates in passing repudiated those on their own side who opposed them.

Obama framed the Democratic outcome as a decision “about whether we choose to play the game, or whether we choose to end it…change that polls well, or change we can believe in. It’s the past versus the future. And when I’m the Democratic nominee for President, that will be the choice in November.”

On his part, McCain gave an oblique “kiss my grits” to the Religious Right by talking about faith in his supporters, the “American character” and “our country” without the obligatory bow to a Higher Power.

With Obama acknowledging McCain as “an American hero,” the ‘08 contest is definitely looking up.

Cross-posted from my blog.

  • superdestroyer
    A civil race will end up as a rout for the Democratic party since a civil election is about personality and usually ignores issues.

    The only question in 2008 is whether the Democratic party gets 60 seats in the Senate or has to wait until 2010.

    I wonder when the MSM decides that the Republican party is irrelevant to American politics and thus is not worthy of any more coverage than the Green party or the Libertarian party?
  • DLS
    Not yet, SD. We must wait at least another decade or two before it's as you suspect -- like the 1980s and 1990s in the NFL when the NFC championship was the real Super Bowl [Dem primaries], because the NFC team routinely defeated the AFC team in the official Super Bowl [general election].
  • DLS
    Bottom-up (Obama) versus top-down (McCain to some extent; definitely in the case of Clinton) -- it has that feeling this year, though it's largely superficial.
  • pacatrue
    I don't understand why a civil campaign favors Democrats unless Republican or conservative ideas can't be expressed with reason, honesty, and politeness -- something which I, even as a Democrat, reject. McCain can attack Obama's or Clinton's ideas relentlessly and thoroughly while maintaining respect for Obama or Clinton as an individual, and vice versa.

    Of course, it's largely moot because, even if McCain and Clinton/Obama conduct themselves relatively decently, there will be tons of money on both sides slinging as much innuendo and character assassination as they can afford.

    To be honest, this reminds me historically a little bit of many Christian institutional attacks on philosophy and science by limiting their expression or doing away with the people expressing the ideas, instead of combatting the ideas directly. This always seemed wholly unnecessary as Christian philosophy can go toe to toe with almost any other philosophy that it had to compete with.

    In the same manner, conservative philosophy can battle civilly with liberal philosophy just fine. The main problem might be that we will discover most Republicans don't hold a conservative philosophy and most Democrats don't hold a liberal philosophy, whatever that is. We simply support certain people and certain issue and vote for whoever advances that hodgepodge of values.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC