Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho) is now the latest lawmaker to get snarled in an unpretty sex-related scandal — one that is being broadcast on the airwaves, making the lightning rounds of the Internet, being pointed to by Democrats and causing consternation among Republicans.
The Washington Post’s article draws together several strands of this story:
Sen. Larry E. Craig pleaded guilty earlier this month to misdemeanor disorderly-conduct charges stemming from his June arrest by an undercover police officer in a men’s restroom at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, a court spokeswoman and the senator’s office said yesterday.
Craig issued a statement confirming his arrest and guilty plea, which were reported in the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call. But the Idaho Republican maintained that he had not engaged in any “inappropriate conduct” and that the airport police misunderstood his behavior.
(EDITOR’s Note: That link mistakenly takes you to the Roll Call piece. The Washington Post story has since been greatly updated to include earlier allegations about and denied by Craig. Here is the link to the UPDATED Washington Post piece.)
So there will be a debate, although on this one there are signs that many Republicans are not going to stand by him in what is clearly not a political incident, even given his explanation:
“At the time of this incident, I complained to the police that they were misconstruing my actions. I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct,” Craig said. “I should have had the advice of counsel in resolving this matter. In hindsight, I should not have pled guilty. I was trying to handle this matter myself quickly and expeditiously.”
Now in his third term, Craig, 62, has been a member of Senate Republican leadership and ran unsuccessfully in 2002 to become the GOP whip, the No. 2 leadership job.
And the arrest means there’s one less Republican bigwig working for Mitt Romney:
He has been a prominent figure on gun rights and Western lands issues, and he resigned yesterday as Idaho chairman of the presidential campaign of former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (R).
Craig “did not want to be a distraction,” said Romney spokesman Matt Rhoades, “and we accept his decision.”
And the details? Here are a few:
Roll Call, citing a copy of a report by airport police, said that officers had been conducting a sting operation inside the men’s room because of complaints of sexual activity there. The police report gives this account of the arrest:
The undercover officer was monitoring the restroom at noon on June 11. A few minutes later, Craig entered and sat in the stall next to him. Craig began tapping his right foot, touched his right foot to the left foot of the officer in the stall next to him and brushed his hand beneath the partition between them. He was then arrested.
Here’s the part that will be quoted and become a late night TV comedians’ punchline:
While he was being interviewed about the incident, Craig gave police a business card showing that he is a U.S. senator. “What do you think about that?” Craig asked the officer, according to the report obtained by Roll Call.
It apparently didn’t prove to be a stay out of court card.
How has it been playing? There are some of the usual reactions from partisans, but it’s inaccurate and wrong to say all of the reaction is along predictable partisan (defend the member of your party; rail against the member of the opposition party) lines. Republicans are not giving him a free ride (so to speak):
Hugh Hewitt, a loyal Republican broadcaster, law professor and blogger, is demanding Craig resign:
I realize that I did not say this about Senator Vitter, but Craig’s behavior is so reckless and repulsive that an immediate exit is required….I don’t believe him. Read the statement by the arresting officer. He must think the people of Idaho are idiots. But even if I did believe him, this would make his judgment too flawed to be in the United States Senate in a time of war. He has to go.
Highly popular conservative blogger Ed Morrissey is also shaking his head (and fist). He offers an answer to Craig’s reported question about the meaning of the Senator’s business card:
We think it means you’re even more foolish than this incident would suggest. How long before Craig checks himself into rehab or finds Jesus?
The Republicans already have a 21-12 disadvantage in next year’s Senate contests. His was one of the seats the GOP hoped to hold, and his party had been pushing to keep him from retiring. I suspect they’re looking for Plan B at the moment.
Another conservative pundit, Hot Air’s Allahpundit, has a post that MUST be read in full and it makes clear Craig won’t be getting a free ride (so to speak):
If you’re wondering which party he belongs to, let me put it this way: the media will be sure to specify it in its reporting on this story.
The page at Roll Call is down due to server overload but you can read the nuts and bolts at Political Wire. He was one of the senators named by the left’s McCarthyites during the Foley uproar as being in the closet. The details from Roll Call don’t explicitly corroborate that claim, but…
Special disastrous bonus factoid: He’s up for re-election next year!
Read his entire post with the updates from dismayed conservatives on other sites.
AND HERE’S A SAMPLING OF OTHER OPINIONS FROM VARYING SITES:
–John Cole says he notices a trend in Republican scandals and rejects any suggestion that the media is any problem here. We won’t quote it since you need to read the entire post.
–Crooks and Liars’ John Amato recaps 1982 “rumors” about Craig.
–Prairie Weather sees another issue:
Pathetic. And there’s feel of entrapment to the story. Whatever the case, I wish our culture were a little more grownup about people’s sexuality. The Larry Craig incident makes me sad for a variety of reasons as well as irritated at Republican duplicity and hypocrisy. How much better if Larry Craig had been stopped for harrassment, gender of the victim left unstated. But it’s a hypocritical society in which we still live — all of us, Democrats as well as Republicans. We can’t seem to stop pointing and giggling when it comes to sexual issues. Are we going to get over it anytime soon? And move on to the important stuff? Or are we stuck here?
–The Republican megablog Powerline:
Thanks to Senator Larry Craig (R-ID), I now know which men’s room to avoid at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport….Contacted by Roll Call for comment, a spokesman for Senator Craig described the incident as a “he said/he said misunderstanding.†Sergeant Karnia said Craig engaged in disorderly conduct. Senator Craig pleaded guilty. At the moment Senator Craig isn’t speaking for himself. When he does get around to speaking for himself again, he’ll be able to clear up the misunderstanding, whatever it might be.
–Booman gets a bit more analytical, siting this quote from the news report:“Craig stated “that he has a wide stance when going to the bathroom and that his foot may have touched mine,” the report states. Craig also told the arresting officer that he reached down with his right hand to pick up a piece of paper that was on the floor. “It should be noted that there was not a piece of paper on the bathroom floor, nor did Craig pick up a piece of paper,” the arresting officer said in the report.” So Booman writes this:
That’s a whole lot of code that I knew nothing about. But Larry has certainly earned a new nickname: Wide Stance Craig.
Sen. Craig is listed as the third most conservative senator by Progressive Punch. He has voted for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.
He says he takes a wide stance when he takes a crap. If his wife believes him, I’ll be shocked.
Republicans are taking the public sex racket to a national level.
Not content to let Florida State Rep. Bob Allen have all the fun, Senator Larry Craig of Idaho was arrested in a public restroom for propositioning a male undercover police officer. This is somehow all old hat: Craig was arrested in June, plead guilty on August 8, paid a small fee, dodged jail time, and was given a year of probation. Craig’s staff dismissed the incident as a simple — love this — “he said/he said misunderstanding.”
But wait a minute. Any time a man (or a woman) makes his (or her) name and career by being holier-than-Democrats, the blogosphere has a right to some schadenfreude.
–Right Wing Nuthouse (a blog that is misnamed):
The conduct doesn’t seem lewd to me and the whole story reeks of something very fishy. But the fact is, the Senator pled guilty and probably thought that it would stay out of the papers if he didn’t make a fuss.
The point really isn’t whether he’s guilty or innocent. The point is that this sort of thing becomes a huge issue because of the way the party talks about gays and the way many GOP stalwarts like Reverends Robertson and Dobson talk about sex. The perception that Republicans are a bunch of bigoted blue noses stuck in the 19th century with Victorian sensibilities about the bedroom turns off a lot of voters – especially the young.
Turns out that Sen. Craig voted for cloture on amnesty. Whoops. Like a lot of conservative/libertarian types, I might be willing to look the other way on a little public pervitude once in a while, but public pervitude + total abandonment of national sovereignty and the rule of law is just a little too much for me to take. If Sen. Craig “goes down” over this (as I suspect he might,) I won’t be shedding any tears.
–Caffeinated Politics notes that “he was also working in Congress to deny basic rights and fairness to gay Americans that have normal lives. You know, the kind that would never have sex with a conservative Republican anywhere….let alone in a bathroom.”
GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney is scrubbing his campaign of anything scented with the increasingly foul presence of one U.S. Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho.
Idaho – indeed, most of the Pacific Northwest – has been suffering from a Republican Scandal Gap. Maybe it’s because, aside from Idaho, the Northwest hasn’t recently had very many Republicans who mattered enough for us to care….
….Thankfully, though, Larry Craig has stepped up to the plate for both the state of my birth and the entire region. The only scandals that really matter are those that involve improper money or racy sex. We have fallen way behind up here in the upper left corner of the map where Abramoff and D.C. madams don’t seem to have a great deal of market…er…um…penetration, and the memory of that remarkable Packwood Senate censure debate of 15 or so years ago has lost its currency, so it’s good to see that there are stalwarts of our own who, at least in the eyes of the Minnesota judicial system, will do their best to get us in the show and steal a bit of thunder from all those current and former midwestern, Louisianan, and San Diego Congressmen, Floridian state legislators, and all the others who have been stealing all those ‘sleaze’ headlines…
Senator Craig Withdraws From Role in Romney Campaign, Conservative Calls for Resignation…
The Boston Globe reports tonight that Senator Larry Craig of Idaho has resigned “as Senate co-chairman for Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign.” The resignation comes in the wake of the disclosure that Craig has pleaded guilty earlie…
It’s amazing that in this time of war no one else seems to grasp the real significance of Craig’s men’s room misbehavior. That is, he made himself blackmail bait, and for all we know, not for the first time.
How much sensitive national-security information could be gotten out of Craig, had he been accommodated by a foreign agent or al Qaeda sympathizer in that airport bathroom?
Or, maybe an operative for some business, political or criminal interest might easily have blackmailed Craig into voting a certain way, and into encouraging other senators to vote a certain way that’s not in the country’s best interest, in return for keeping quiet about his indiscretion.
The lame “he said/he said” defense and all the snickering and finger pointing by people on both sides of the partisan divide all seem focused on Craig’s hypocrisy and his bid for an unseemly sexual encounter. All the more scandalous, these people would have it, because of the obvious homosexual or bisexual nature of the encounter Craig sought.
They reveal a shallowness and junior-high-level fixation that only distracts from what we all should really be concerned about, not only in Craig’s case, but in those of Sen. David Vitter and the others.
Whether Craig is gay, bi or asexual is of no real consequence, where his ability to serve his state and the country in the Senate are concerned. What matters is how he conducts himself, how he regards his position of high responsibility and how he honors the trust of the people who elected him. On all those scores, Craig comes up badly lacking.
So badly lacking that Craig should indeed resign, pronto.
I’m inclined to agree with Prairie Weather. I recall Bill Maher talking about how the French were seemingly able to vote their candidates without giving a damn about their sexual escapades (Sarkozy’s wife is estranged and soon to be divorced, Royal has a long term couple but never married) because “they aren’t a bunch of six year olds who scream and giggle if they see pee-pee parts”.
Mind you, I find the matter amusing myself, but not the scandal so much as the fact that at this point I’m begining to see moralizing grandstanding on “family values” as a sure sign of hidden moral issues. I can certainly appreciate the irony and I have little sympathy for him, since he hypocritically demonized his own to get ahead but I don’t particularly think he should lose his job over a sex-scandal. His wife, certainly, but that’s her decision to make. His job, he should resign if he sees no chance of re-election, but really it should be up to the voters to decide if they want him or not.
Just as McGreevey needed to lose his job, not because he was gay, but because he was corrupt, this man, as long as he does his job well, should keep it, gay or no gay. Of course, it’d be nice if he stopped with the idiodic demonzing.
Why an airport bathroom?
Surely there are more discreet (and more sanitary) locations for meeitngs to be kept secret from the wife?
There is an element of recklessness in this. As a public figure, surely a Senator would be aware how difficult it is to keep private life from publiceyes, even in the most innocent of circumstances. Or is that part of the allure? Does the danger of discovery itself provide a thrill?
I see the outline for a psychological thriller here.
Craig could turn this public humiliation into an opportunity to make the case for tolerance and reason.
Wouldn’t the religious right drive Craig out of the Republican party if he took such a stance? I doubt intolerance and rigidity on moral issues such as gay marriage is any Republican’s true position-rather it is forced on them by Christian conservative groups like Focus on the Family.
What I find more troubling than Craig’s double life, is his lack of remorse after pleading guilty, and his incredible denial of the facts laid out in his arrest record. According to him, the police totally misunderstood his intent, he wasn’t sending signals to the undercover cop, he has a wide stance (most incredible of all in my book!)blah, blah, blah. He has exposed himself not only as a hypocritical closeted homosexual, but as a craven liar, who would say anything to preserve his career.
Personally, I don’t give two figs about whether or not he has sex in men’s restrooms, but I think the people of Idaho at least deserve someone who can face the truth about their own behavior, instead of issuing such patently false denials on his webpage.
Even Foley, had the grace to apologize to his constituents.
Mind you I haven’t, and won’t, looked all that close, but did it strike anyone else as a bit funny that the probable cause here was tapping a foot while sitting on the can?
While it’s obvious what was going on, Craig didn’t proposition the officer in a conversation. Did Craig do do wrong(yes), but this wasn’t exactly a “lewd act”. Now his spin on what was really going on is lewd. While there why didn’t Craig visit with Elmer Gantry?
Doesn’t the Conservative wing’s insistance on electing straight, morally upright, candidates with impeccable family values, directly contribute to incidents like this in the GOP?
In the end, sexual repression doesn’t work, it just forces the perpetrators to go underground, where their acts eventually resurface in the most humiliating and embarassing fashion . Craig is actually lucky that the revelation of his escapade surfaced during a week when Congress is in recess and the rest of Washington is obsessing ad nauseum over Gonzo’s abrupt departure from Justice!
Putting this in perspective, it’s like soliciting a prostitute from your car. In the Detroit area their are areas were this regularly happens, and signs are posted about police decoys and soliciting as a crime. Pulling over and rolling down your window and talking about the Tigers baseball team and homeruns could be considers soliciting, but the action of stopping on the road with the intent of soliciting shouldn’t be a crime. Intention without verbal solicitation SHOULDN’T be anything more than say loitering.
Forget the gay aspect, this man cruises public restrooms looking for sex. This isn’t about tolerance and reason, which I thought was a very funny comment btw. Thats terribly unsafe and creepy. If you’re looking to give your wife AIDS, thats probably the best way to go about it.
I’m not familiar with his record, but since he’s a closeted gay memeber of the GOP from Idaho I’m going to go out on a limb here and say he was a vocal gay bashing “Family Values” type candidate. Please correct me if I’m wrong. I’m beginning to wonder if there are enough such folks in the christian right that they actually deserve some representation in Congress.
Sam, they have representation in Congress, as this man and others like him clearly show.
It would appear so. Unfortunately they seem to lose that representation as soon as they come out of the closet. You’d really think the log cabin republicans would kick off a marketing campaign or something. Who knows, ’08 might be their year.
Craig’s voting record is anti-gay rights- not just gay marriage, but against expanding hate legislation and against protection of gays in the workplace.
Republicans are forced to live out a charade to gain support of the RNC who is influenced greatly by conservative Christian groups like Tony Perkins’ group and others. An openly gay Republican would never be elected or be allowed to remain in office. Thus, there’s a huge uproar when the truth finally comes out.
I believe that there was a rumor about Craig being outed during the Foley scandal, but it was kept under wraps until his recent arrest. Joe posted an update, questioning whether the Senator was able to keep his arrest hidden from the press and public by suppressing court and police records. Makes you wonder. . . .