Romney Defusing Washington Post Report Accusing Him Bullying When a Teenager (UPDATED)

First we had the report that Barack Obama ate dog when he was a boy living overseas. Now comes a bit of a more serious accusation — bullying when a teenager — that Time’s Mark Halperin says has sparked a Mitt Romney “apology tour” (which will include a stop at Sean Hannity’s to be sure) due to this Washington Post report:
Mitt Romney returned from a three-week spring break in 1965 to resume his studies as a high school senior at the prestigious Cranbrook School. Back on the handsome campus, studded with Tudor brick buildings and manicured fields, he spotted something he thought did not belong at a school where the boys wore ties and carried briefcases. John Lauber, a soft-spoken new student one year behind Romney, was perpetually teased for his nonconformity and presumed homosexuality. Now he was walking around the all-boys school with bleached-blond hair that draped over one eye, and Romney wasn’t having it.
“He can’t look like that. That’s wrong. Just look at him!” an incensed Romney told Matthew Friedemann, his close friend in the Stevens Hall dorm, according to Friedemann’s recollection. Mitt, the teenaged son of Michigan Gov. George Romney, kept complaining about Lauber’s look, Friedemann recalled.
A few days later, Friedemann entered Stevens Hall off the school’s collegiate quad to find Romney marching out of his own room ahead of a prep school posse shouting about their plan to cut Lauber’s hair. Friedemann followed them to a nearby room where they came upon Lauber, tackled him and pinned him to the ground. As Lauber, his eyes filling with tears, screamed for help, Romney repeatedly clipped his hair with a pair of scissors.
Bullying is HUGE issue now in schools and states are passing legislation putting tight controls on schools to weed it out and make it clear that students who do it must face firm consequences and schools that don’t crack down on it may have administrators who can face career (or legal) difficulties. Some news reports and websites now refer to Lauber as a “closeted gay.”
This is a story that is unlikely to have “legs” (even though according to one report Obama operatives mailed it out to other reporters as soon as they saw it) but it can’t just be ignored since the Post did its journalistic homework. Most editors I worked with when I was a full time reporter insisted that on a story like this you have three independent sources to back up a controversial assertion. The Post has more than that:
The incident was recalled similarly by five students, who gave their accounts independently of one another. Four of them — Friedemann, now a dentist; Phillip Maxwell, a lawyer; Thomas Buford, a retired prosecutor; and David Seed, a retired principal — spoke on the record. Another former student who witnessed the incident asked not to be named. The men have differing political affiliations, although they mostly lean Democratic. Buford volunteered for Barack Obama’s campaign in 2008. Seed, a registered independent, has served as a Republican county chairman in Michigan. All of them said that politics in no way colored their recollections.
“It happened very quickly, and to this day it troubles me,” said Buford, the school’s wrestling champion, who said he joined Romney in restraining Lauber. Buford subsequently apologized to Lauber, who was “terrified,” he said. “What a senseless, stupid, idiotic thing to do.”
“It was a hack job,” recalled Maxwell, a childhood friend of Romney who was in the dorm room when the incident occurred. “It was vicious.”
“He was just easy pickins,” said Friedemann, then the student prefect, or student authority leader of Stevens Hall, expressing remorse about his failure to stop it.
The incident transpired in a flash, and Friedemann said Romney then led his cheering schoolmates back to his bay-windowed room in Stevens Hall.
Friedemann, guilt ridden, made a point of not talking about it with his friend and waited to see what form of discipline would befall Romney at the famously strict institution. Nothing happened.
When I’ve talked to school students at all levels about bullying, I tell them that the pain can last for years: I often ask them to ask an adult in their life about if and when they were bullied..a parent or even a grandparent…and they will usually find that an adult can remember bullying for many years, just like it happened yesterday. The pain is that profound. I even did a nationally syndicated Cagle column on it.
And apparently the pain lasted in this case for years, too:
After the incident, Lauber seemed to disappear. He returned days later with his shortened hair back to its natural brown. He finished the year, but ultimately left the school before graduation — thrown out for smoking a cigarette.
Sometime in the mid-1990s, David Seed noticed a familiar face at the end of a bar at Chicago O’Hare International Airport.
“Hey, you’re John Lauber,” Seed recalled saying at the start of a brief conversation. Seed, also among those who witnessed the Romney-led incident, had gone on to a career as a teacher and principal. Now he had something to get off his chest.
“I’m sorry that I didn’t do more to help in the situation,” he said.
Lauber paused, then responded, “It was horrible.” He went on to explain how frightened he was during the incident, and acknowledged to Seed, “It’s something I have thought about a lot since then.”
Lauber died in 2004, according to his three sisters.
I’ve noted before that the difference between Obama and Romney now is that so much of Obama’s history has been gone over with a fine tooth comb. Romney is newer to the stage so reporters will still be peering into every facet of his life.
Romney has responded by doing radio interviews where he says he can’t recall the incident — not unimaginable, but a bit unusual given the number of others who do. If the story continues, it will be because he doesn’t recall it rather than just say he did it as a dumb kid. Here, it sounds like he’s trying to have it both ways:
In a radio interview added to the candidate’s public schedule at the last minute, Romney said he did not recall many specific incidents involving pranks or bullying during his school years — including the hair-cutting episode.
But he admitted that “did some dumb things,” and “if anyone was hurt by that I apologize for that.”
On the day after President Barack Obama announced his personal support for same-sex marriage, Romney called accusations that these alleged pranks — including reportedly mocking a fellow student with shouts of “atta girl” in class — were motivated by perceptions of these students’ sexuality “absurd.”
Without mentioning specific incidents, Romney apologized several times to anyone his “hijinks” may have hurt if or when they went “too far.”
“If I did stupid things, I’m afraid I’ve got to say sorry for it,” Romney said, pointing out that his high school days were many decades behind him. “I’m quite a different guy now.”
“I’m quite a different guy now” was his motif during the primaries, too.
Stories about Romney apologizing are now hitting the new and old media.
It’s never quite clear whether a politician’s high school years are fair game for political attacks. Romney suggested during the interview that the acts he was apologizing for were merely youthful indiscretions; the Post described him pinning a closeted gay classmate to the ground and cutting his long hair, for example. But with the story suggesting latent homophobia in an adolescent Romney and with President Barack Obama having endorsed same-sex marriage on Wednesday, the piece reverberated.
Still, Romney said he was “not going to be too concerned” about the item. He insisted that he grew up in a tolerant environment and that there was nothing about his pranks that were discriminatory towards gays.
Romney’s dog on the roof….Obama eating a organic, real hot dog..Romney bullying. I’ve argued that some of this is silly stuff — but bullying is an extremely serious subject, one that, unlike strapping a dog on the roof of the car while going on a family vacation or savoring dog meat as an elementary school kid won’t be as easy for late night comedians to lampoon (which doesn’t meant they’ll not do it).
Downside for Romney: he has to defuse it and it adds to a portrait that will not change the minds of those not inclined to vote for him or skeptical of him.
Warning flag for Romney: You are being vetted and Obama has been vetted a lot more. Will you be the source of more material for investigative reporters?
Graphic via shutterstock.com
FOOTNOTE: You can follow blog reaction here. In many cases theyr’e not about the issue of bullying or how the campaigns are going after childhood or teenage tidbits but written to defend or rip down a candidate the support or don’t support. Read a bunch of them and make your own decisions (if is fun and enlightening to surf blogs of varying viewpoints).
UPDATE: The Atlantic Wire puts this into the political context:
What would be the worst possible news for Mitt Romney to have to deal with the day after President Obama announced he supports gay marriage? Romney’s already had a gay staffer resign because social conservatives were outraged he’d hire an openly gay person. And having a hypothetical family member come out as gay would probably help him seem more compassionate. But one thing that might project an image Romney really wants to avoid — heartless outmoded anti-gay conservative — would be a long profile in The Washington Post about how he bullied a gay kid in high school. At the exact moment Romney doesn’t want to talk about gay stuff, the Post’s Jason Horowitz reports Romney led a gang of boys who singled out a gay kid, held him down while he cried, and cut off the kid’s offensively un-hetero hair. No one ever likes a bully, but it’s really a bad time to be an anti-gay bully. (Update: Romney apologized Thursday morning for high school pranks that went too far.)
“Aren’t there issues of significance you’d like to talk about? The economy, the economy, the economy,” Romney asked a Colorado TV reporter Wednesday with faux-niceness as she kept pestering him about gay marriage, immigration and medical marijuana.
UPDATE II: Jonathan Chait:
The best way to assess a candidate is not to plumb his youth for clues to his character but to look at his positions and public record. The problem is that this is a harder exercise with Romney than almost any other national politician. He has had to run in such divergent atmospheres, and has thus had to present himself in such wildly different ways at different times, that his record becomes almost useless. There is hardly a stance Romney has taken that he has not negated at one point or another. This makes the fraught task of trying to pin down his true character more urgent, though not any easier.
My cautious, provisional take is that this portrait of the youthful Romney does suggest a man who grew up taking for granted the comforts of wealth and prestige. I don’t blame him for accepting the anti-gay assumptions of his era. The story does give the sense of a man who lacks a natural sense of compassion for the weak. His prankery seems to have invariably singled out the vulnerable — the gay classmate, the nearly blind teacher, the nervous day student racing back to campus. It’s entirely possible to grow out of that youthful mentality — to learn to step out of your own perspective, to develop an appreciation for the difficulties faced by those not born with Romney’s many blessings. I’m just not sure he ever has.
Share This

UGH. I don’t even want to give this type of story any time, but this is exactly the problem we have now. I don’t care what Mitt Romney did in 1965. Everyone changes. I am still not supporting him because I just don’t agree with the Republican platform at the moment. I don’t agree with all the Dem. platform either. But, my decision is not made on if Romney tied a dog to a car, if Obama ate dog or called himself Barry, or if he bullied. I would hope that the moderates of the world could rise above this. I follow this blog to find something more than the normal drivel. Let’s start ignoring these feeds from the 24 hr news cycle and really figure out where the middle ground is, what really matters, etc.
I guess to some outright mean and bullying behavior is just drivel and doesn’t matter. I guess if he were shown to have changed significantly, it might not. He doesn’t seem that different to me now. He still seems like a big ol bully who sees someone different from himself — whose reality and circumstances he doesn’t understand — and makes it a point to punish or diminish the reality of those people.
There are boyish pranks and then there are boyish pranks. I also believe it is important to look at the WHOLE picture and not just one or two episodes.
Here is a piece mentioning that Romney and some of his fellow students lured, trapped and forcibly shaving college students from another school. Is that kidnapping to hold someone against their will?
http://www.politicker.com/2012/04/mitt-romneys-strange-sense-of-humor/
And Romney supports the “baptisms” that his church does to people, regardless of religion, who have died, so their souls will be Mormon. That is much more recent.
Romney doesn’t respect gays and lesbians even to this day.
Romney, while at Bain laid of thousands of people at some of the companies he bought. While he was laying off those thousands of people he was bringing in millions of dollars. That is not creating a strong community when you take money and jobs from the poor and give to the rich.
All in all it seems that Romney doesn’t respect others. To learn form the past is one thing. If he respected others now, especially those with different views, then I say we can probably move past this. But hi disrespect continues to this day. He is a vile person when started as a kid. Those incidents in high school and college are horrible. No doubt that conservatives will say that it is “boys being boys” but it is not “boys being boys”. Most boys would NEVER do that. Romney’s actions are those of a juvenile delinquent getting away with assault. Funny that Romney is now just apologizing when it could hurt his chances at the White House. If he really was sorry he would have apologized decades ago.
In theory I agree with mizlandry- the past isn’t a way to judge the present man. However when the present man continues to show the same mindset as he did in the past, then it is fair (and necessary). People need to understand that Romney in many ways is just like that juvenile delinquent that got away with attacks on others. [Do you think if a group of black kids attacked a white kid- Mitt Romney- they would have gotten away with it... in 1965?] The character of the man who wants to be president of the US is extremely important. When I was growing up my mom wouldn’t let me hang around the likes of Mitt Romney, even if his father was governor of Michigan. Why would I want him as president, as a leader and statesman who should set a good example for the citizens?
The issue with Romney in the sixties should be his position on the Vietnam War. Romney was pro war, but he himself fled to France to avoid conscription.
Now present day he has the nerve to tell the rest of us we should not want a French style health care system where all have affordable universal care.
As a Vietnam Vet that is my issue with Romney, plus his constant attacks on Medicare and Social Security.
Mitt Romney would be a horrible President and it is imperative we Boomers reject this hypocrite.
Seriously, now we’re mining Romney’s high school years for dirt?
If “assault” is “dirt”, then yeah. Sorry.
The bullies I knew in high school years, whom I still know today, are still bullies. Why should Mitt Romney be any different? Besides just like a bully, he is trying to weasel his way out of this by saying he didn’t think that the kid with the bleached hair might be gay, and it was not bullying it was a “prank.” C’mon! This kind of lying is typical of the sociopathic character that comes with bullying. Once a bully, always a bully. Watch out America!
“Besides just like a bully, he is trying to weasel his way out of this by saying he didn’t think that the kid with the bleached hair might be gay”
Exactly right. This is the part of his non-apology that really kills me. He doesn’t remember anything about the incident at all, except that he somehow remembers that the kid was definitely not being harassed for being gay, because they didn’t think like that in the ’60s. Not only does he fully contradict himself by remembering that he wasn’t gay yet remembers nothing at all about the incident, but he manages to erase the awful abuse gay people suffered in the 60s.
The story depicts Romney as a spoiled brat with a feeling of entitlement, as much as a bully. And it appears that he was not just a participant, but a leader of the pack in this transgression. Are these the kind of leadership qualities we want from our president?
Most thoughtful people understand Obama is not defined by his cocaine usage and that an older Robert Byrd was not defined by his KKK days. Romney should be judged by his current actions and policies (and there is plenty there to criticize), not by activities as a teenager. And as a target of bullying several times in high school myself I’m not defending Romney’s actions. Just saying going back into candidate’s teenage years is a dangerous road to go down.
Unlike our first poster I DO want to know about an incident like this because it tells us about the real character of a person, not the persona he has carefully crafted for public viewing. To me this depicts a Romny with little empathy, conscience, or courage. It’s an ugly little tale about a person with a black spot in his heart. Now this same person aspires to leadership of the greatest country on the earth. Damn right I want to know about what makes him tick! Keep vetting!
Going back to teenage years to evaluate personality type is vey legitimate. In fact going back to early childhood to evaluate personality type is legitimate. In comparing president Obama to Romney, sure all adolescents do “stupid” things but experimentation with getting high is a world away from being in a gang of bullies, even a leader of that gang, that beats up on another adolescent who is different in some way. This says volumes about Romney’s personality, and not one word is good.
These incidents suggest that Romney would be more like Andrew Jackson than FDR. At a time when terrorists are blowing people up all over the world, do we really want to have someone as Commander in Chief who was a bully in his teen years, was a bully in college, and was a bully in the way he obtained $300,000,000?
I hate to do this. I really hate to do this. Never the less, back in 1932 there was another politician who believed in bullying. He became the leader of a powerful nation. That did not go so well–for that nation especially.
The fact that Romney was the leader of this gang who assaulted someone else is even worse. Not just that he led a group, but that he was successful in his bullying and no doubt received positive feedback. When a person engages in a particular behavior and they receive affirmation of that behavior they will continue that behavior (as he Romney did in college). There is certainly something very affirming about bringing together a group of people together, have them follow your lead, succeed in that task and being recognized with praise. That reinforces your beliefs and actions. And Romney participated in such action later.
So his bullying is, I feel, ingrained in him. Unless stories come to light from his college days in which he was severely reprimanded for bullying and assaulting others. The person he is today is very much that coldhearted, selfish bully from high school.
If we get into a crises with China, or Russia (or God forbid North Korea) is he going to follow his “bully” instincts and fire away? Or will he be reasonable in his approach, listen, deliberate and try other solutions?
i so hope that the ignorant things everyone did at least once in school days are not what we do today. With Mr. Romney or anyone doing what Mr Romney is alleged to have done, it wouldnt be an issue about what he did in school, if he didnt appear to hold the same ‘you’re not worthy of equal rights’ attitude about gay people today. Just my .02
Considering Romney’s attitudes and personality now, his being a bully doesn’t surprise me in the least. Seems he’s gotten ahead in life by targeting and trampling those he sees as “weaker” than himself along with the advantages of his privileged life.