An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

Poll: Romney Headed for Big Win in New Hampshire and Gaining Steam Elsewhere

A new poll shows former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is headed for a big win in New Hampshire — as other polls show in surging in Iowa and nationally. Unless there is yet another abrupt reversal in trending in the battle for the 2012 Republican nomination, it may turn out that the original belief of Romney’s “inevitability” will prove true.

Mitt Romney holds a commanding lead in the run-up to the Jan. 10 New Hampshire primary, according to a new poll released Thursday afternoon by Public Policy Polling.

Romney leads his closest Republican rival in the state, Ron Paul, by 15 percentage points. Newt Gingrich is a distant third. Gingrich’s support in the state has dropped 4 percentage points, from 17 percent to 13 percent, since the last PPP survey in mid-December. The drop, though modest in scale, underscores the perception that Gingrich is losing momentum nationally, and in the first-to-vote states of Iowa and New Hampshire.

The poll, conducted among likely Republican primary voters, indicates that Romney is drawing 36 percent support, compared to 21 percent for Paul.

Jon Huntsman, who has bet his candidacy on a strong performance in the Granite State, has 12 percent support according to the poll, placing him fourth. This showing does not suggest Huntsman is strong enough to make a serious impact in New Hampshire, especially because it shows no improvement in his position from the same organization’s earlier poll in the state.

Among the other contenders, Michele Bachmann has 7 percent support, while Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and Buddy Roemer are tied at 3 percent each.

The weak standings of Bachmann, Perry and Santorum underscore New Hampshire’s reputation as a less-favorable state for religious conservatives than Iowa.

And the context also suggests a Romney surge:

  • Romney now leads Gingrich nationally 27% to 23 %.
  • In Iowa, Fox News reports, a Rasmussen poll has Romney and Ron Paul in a dead heat, with 23 and 22 percent respectively, and Rick Santorum in third with 16 percent. “In a troubling sign for Newt Gingrich, the same survey showed the ex-House speaker tied for fourth with Rick Perry,” Fox News writes.
  • Meanwhile, in other developments:
    Paul says sanctions against Iran would be an act of war. He will likely lose votes due to some of his foreign policy statements. Such as this. The Politico:

    The anti-war stance, the sharp criticism of the war on terrorism, the calls to rein in military spending — all of it is fueling Paul’s support among the young voters who throng his events, and among independents and Democrats.

    In a historically dovish state, with a crowded contest uniquely suited to a candidate with a fervent base of support, it’s a model that can work. But beyond Iowa’s borders, in a hawkish party that has traditionally embraced a muscular military role and recently criticized President Barack Obama for his alleged timidity, it’s a different story.

    Michele Bachmann has big problems:

    One of Michele Bachmann’s top campaign advisers is breaking with his own candidate to defend Kent Sorenson, the Bachmann campaign’s former Iowa chairman who publicly defected to Ron Paul on Wednesday.

    Wes Enos, Bachmann’s Iowa political director, released a statement Thursday defending Sorenson from Bachmann’s accusation that Paul offered him money to switch allegiances.

    In a statement distributed by Sorenson, Enos stated “unequivocally” that Sorenson’s decision was “in no way financially motivated.”

    “His decision had more to do with the fact that the Ron Paul supporters have been something of a family to him since he was first elected in 2008 and here in the end, as it becomes more and more apparent that the caucus cycle is coming to an end, Kent believed that he needed to be with them as they stand on the cusp of a potential caucus upset,” Enos said in the statement.

    “While I personally disagree with Kent’s decision, and plan to stay with Michele Bachmann because I truly believe in her, I cannot, in good conscious watch a good man like Kent Sorenson be attacked as a ‘sell-out’ … That is simply not the case, and it was not the basis of his decision,” he added.

    The Romney camp’s confidence is perceptibly growing:

    At the first three stops on his Iowa bus tour, capacity crowds prompted the campaign to open overflow rooms. By Thursday the campaign had re-jiggered its expectations and set up a tent outside Romney’s morning stop at a diner, where about 40 voters who could not squeeze into the cafe waited to see the candidate.

    A campaign aide said he had expected Romney’s support to grow in the state as undecided voters began to make their final decisions, but said the campaign had been surprised by the size of the turnout at events.

    In a sign of increased confidence, an aide confirmed Romney will spend caucus night in Des Moines – instead of in Romney’s firewall state of New Hampshire, where the campaign could cushion the blow of a poor Iowa showing.

    Romney has long said he would like to win Iowa, but has also said he does not expect to win every state. He went a step further Wednesday in acknowledging the momentum he felt in the Hawkeye State.

    “The numbers that are showing up are a lot more than we’d expected. And their level of excitement and enthusiasm and their willingness to caucus on my behalf is encouraging,” he told members of the media in Clinton. “So the response I’m getting is really quite heartening.”



    6 Responses to “Poll: Romney Headed for Big Win in New Hampshire and Gaining Steam Elsewhere”

    1. Allen says:

      Lets see, who will it be for Mitt’s vice?

      Perry….hmmmm…no he’s a dummmy.
      Santorum…..who?
      Huntsman…..maybe.
      Bachmann…maybe.
      Paul…uh nope.
      Newt…..hell no.

    2. RP says:

      Allen..
      Huntsman..No he is also Morman and they sure would not want two mormans on one ticket even though Huntsman is probably the most qualified of all those running.

      Bachmann..Just another Palin without the baggage of an unmarried pregnant daughter.Doubt it.

      Bet its a southern or midwest gov. or senator that is a little more conserative than romney, but also has shown an ability to work with the democrats on key issues.

      But none of this matters. The economy is improving, there will be more people stop looking for work which will artificially reduce the unemployment rate to 8% or slightly less (much like the current artificial 8.6+%) and Obama might put Hilliary on as Vice President, moving Joe to sec of state, thus planning for Hilliary’s run in 2016. All of this results in a squeeker of a victory for BO, leading to 4 years of absolute nothing getting done with a Republican controlled Senate and House.

    3. adelinesdad says:

      It won’t be one of the current crop of candidates. My guess is Condi. There are several other alternatives (Paul Ryan, Jeb Bush, Christie), but honestly I don’t think having two white guys on the ticket is a good idea. The pendulum has swung and hasn’t settled back into post-racial territory yet.

    4. Allen says:

      RP-

      Well Mormons are staunch social conservatives, far more than evangelical protestants. Actually Romney is the most socially liberal of the bunch so he will butt heads with the Tea Party congress. Not sure how that would play out.

      As for Hillary, no, she’s getting a little long in the tooth and probably tired of the BS. Doubt she’s interested anymore.

    5. As a tea-bagging, right-winger hobbit, I will hold my nose and vote/support Romney because he is the only one electable. Newt makes me as sick as Barack does. Neither one should ever be in a leadership position. I live next to Ron Paul’s district and I have never trusted him (he is a nut and so is his followers). I live in Texas and not once did I ever vote for pretty boy Rick Perry (I just didn’t vote in the governor’s race). The rest of them are pretenders like Perry and Paul.

      Who for VP? Who really cares. The recent VP’s had no real power except maybe Cheney. The clown we got in there now has diarrhea of the mouth. I will say he is entertaining. He isn’t as entertaining as Michelle.

      This administration is clownish and I can’t believe Hilliary even wants to associate herself with Barack and company!

      My favorite Michelle moments is as follows:

      Her planting a garden, it was clear from the pictures she didn’t have a clue to planting a garden but she was the “expert” according to the media and her office.

      The shopping trip to Target was just too funny! The SS had to shut the store down so she could get some dogfood. Barack’s visit with Bo to Petsmark was also a funny moment.

      But my favorite Michelle moment is her ascension to the fitness and health Queen role. She is telling everyone how to eat and exercise while she has to have a bodyfat ratio of at least 30%. I have worked out for over 40 years and I can tell by looking at her that she has a very high fat ratio. I would think a spokeswomen for health would want to be a positive model for health and the kids. She is not a positive role model and then she gets caught eating very unhealthy. It is, don’t do as I do, do as I say because I’m the queen and I don’t have follow the same rules. You go girl!

      That is my two cents!

    6. bluebelle says:

      Hillary long in the tooth?? Ron Paul would be 78 by the time he took office so– in comparison she’s a spring chicken.

      I actually think switching them is a really bad idea because its akin to admitting that Biden was a mistake from the beginning- which I don’t think he was. The nation needed a low-key VP after 8 years of the firebrand Cheney.

    © 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity