Pin-a-Tail-on-Perry Debate

A Tea Party remake of “The Rocky Horror Show” could become as much a cult classic as the original that ended with space aliens leaving behind “crawling on the planet’s face, tiny insects called the human race, lost in time, and lost in space–and meaning.”

Last night’s performance was a howl with other actors taking turns whacking at the mad scientist’s creation, Rocky Horror, the Frankenstein Adonis who threatens their well-being.

Rick Perry played the robotic lead to perfection, never losing his composure, even as he took umbrage at Michele Bachmann’s suggestion that he had been making “innocent little 12-year-old girls have a government injection by an executive order” in return for pharmaceutical company campaign contributions.

The Texas governor said he was wounded by the suggestion that he could be bought for $5000, without disclosing what the going price might be.

Mild-mannered Jon Huntsman bounded on to accuse Perry of being “almost treasonous” for suggesting that the border with Mexico could never secured, and Rick Santorum charged the Texan for pandering to Latino voters by letting illegal immigrant children attend college at in-state tuition rates. Santorum may have been joking, but with his perpetual clueless smile, who could tell?

Mitt Romney, of course, led the chorus in denouncing the Ponzi scheme aria on Social Security, even as Ron Paul complained that his state taxes had gone up under Perry.

As the almost nightly debates go on, TV viewers may lose interest in these orgiastic doings, but that’s not too likely with a Tea Party audience yelling approval when Dr. Paul was asked if he would let an uninsured young man die if he came down with a life-threatening disease.

In cult performances, there are always small gems that go unnoticed.

MORE.

Author: ROBERT STEIN

Share This Post On

5 Comments

  1. Mr. Stein
    I had wondered after reading live-blog reports of this moment:

    where have we come in this country when we can politically cheer for someone’s untimely illness-related demise (because, well, they had the “freedom” to choose whether or not to buy medical insurance–as if that is everyone’s viable and attainable possibility at present), or for the possibility of death-penalty execution by the state in today’s increasing acknowledgement of mistaken criminal identity?

    Let the questions continue to roll. Let’s see what’s on this GOP’s mind, and let’s appreciate the audience applause for what it brutally, honestly is.

  2. “without disclosing what the going price might be.”

    I was wondering that myself, but your line was still good for a laugh.

  3. I can’t stop laughing.

    I can’t stop laughing.

    If I could just stop laughing.

  4. “As the almost nightly debates go on, TV viewers may lose interest in these orgiastic doings, but that’s not too likely with a Tea Party audience yelling approval when Dr. Paul was asked if he would let an uninsured young man die if he came down with a life-threatening disease.”

    I finally got a chance to listen to the debate, and this isn’t entirely accurate either. I heard one or two voices yelling at the point where Paul noted the consequence of risk. The scenario was a young man who could afford insurance, but chose not to, then came down with the disease. This was after Paul had also talked about Catholic hospitals caring for those who couldn’t pay in the past. It wasn’t the typical audience cheering.

  5. I think you’re in denial Prof. Even DaGoat referred to the crowd as a bunch of “jackals” – which I don’t think he intended as high praise. It is what it is and it ain’t pretty. Apparently austerity the TP/GOP claims for it’s cure also includes austerity of the soul.

Submit a Comment