An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

The Irene Mistake

I am a climate change believer and I think that CO2 emissions are in part responsible. I also have a great deal of respect for Bill McKibben.  But this is a mistake:

Irene’s got a middle name, and it’s Global Warming,” environmental activist Bill McKibben wrote Thursday night in The Daily Beast. He argued that this year’s hot Atlantic Ocean temperatures and active spree of hurricanes — coupled with droughts, floods and melting sea ice elsewhere on the globe — are “what climate change looks like in its early stages.”

Irene is a big storm but not unusual.  It’s not really all that intense.  The thing that makes it so potentially dangerous and destructive is it’s path. Blaming Irene on global climate change is wrong and will only increase skepticism even among believers.  He might be better off talking about the lack of hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico.  Texas could use a hurricane or two to end the severe drought it is experiencing.  The blocking high pressure area that is responsible for the drought and the lack of hurricanes is predicted by climate change models.  A hurricane like Irene – not so much.



11 Responses to “The Irene Mistake”

  1. ProfElwood says:

    Every idea has people who will push it too far. To have a few of these people is just part of the movement growing beyond the few core people that started it.

    I know that it’s popular to point to these people and try to use them to paint the whole group, but I’ve always considered that a worthless form of defense. All ideas, good or bad, have their looney followers.

    For that matter, all ideas have people that lay out rational points, and are called looneys anyway.

  2. DaGoat says:

    I agree with you to a point Prof, but it has become routine that every time there is a major weather or geological event it is followed by articles speculating that it was related to AGW. This occurs in mainstream publications and has occurred several times on this website. It’s not just a bunch of looneys driving the stories.

  3. Quelcrist Falconer says:

    Dr. Jeff Masters

    Irene’s impact on the mid-Atlantic and New England

    The impact of Irene on the mid-Atlantic and New England is highly uncertain at this point, because we don’t know if the core of the storm will miss the coast or not. In general, the heaviest rains will fall along a 100-mile swath just to the west of where the center tracks, and the worst wind and storm surge damage will occur to the east. If the core of Irene stays offshore, the mid-Atlantic and New England may escape with a few hundred million dollars in damage from flooding due to heavy rains and storm surge. If Irene hits Long Island or Southeast Massachusetts, the storm has the potential to be a $10 billion disaster. Irene is one of those rare storms that has the potential to make landfall in New England as a Category 2 or stronger hurricane. It is difficult for a major Category 3 or stronger hurricane crossing north of North Carolina to maintain that intensity, because wind shear rapidly increases and ocean temperatures plunge below the 26°C (79°F) level that can support a hurricane. We do expect wind shear to rapidly increase to a high 30 – 50 knots once Irene pushes north of Delaware, which should knock the storm down by at least 15 – 30 mph before it reaches New England. However, this year sea surface temperatures 1 – 3°F warmer than average extend along the East Coast from North Carolina to New York. Waters of at least 26°C extend all the way to Southern New Jersey, which will make it easier for Irene to maintain its strength much farther to the north than a hurricane usually can. During the month of July, ocean temperature off the mid-Atlantic coast (35°N – 40°N, 75°W – 70°W) averaged 2.6°F (1.45°C) above average, the second highest July ocean temperatures since record keeping began over a century ago (the record was 3.8°F above average, set in 2010.) These warm ocean temperatures will also make Irene a much wetter hurricane than is typical, since much more water vapor can evaporate into the air from record-warm ocean surfaces. The latest precipitation forecast from NOAA’s Hydrological prediction center shows that Irene could dump over 8 inches of rain over coastal New England.

    You don’t get much more “globally warming” than that… Increased water temperature = increased hurricane strength.

  4. JSpencer says:

    Maybe Irene’s middle name is global warming, maybe it’s not. Either way, global warming is here – and it’s only going to get worse.

  5. Douglas Wolf says:

    Global warming has preceded every ice age. By the mid-century, it will be very cold on Earth.

  6. RP says:

    Earth history shows how the climate has warmed and cooled over its measurable life

    See link:
    http://www.scotese.com/climate.htm

    Had it not been for Al Gore (the one that invented the internet) being the forecaster of global warming and had this come from the scientific community without any political ties, then the theory may be more acceptible. But in our society where anything the left or right says is unacceptible to 50% of the people on either side, it can not come without debate.

    Granted, the earth is warming, but looking at the chart, it appears we are just leaving a much cooler time.

    As for the hurricane, it appears it will not be as bad as forecasted and that in the long run is bad. The next wone that could be a Katrina for the northeast may turn out just that, given the number of people that will look at the weather forecasters as another “Chicken Little”.

  7. DLS says:

    McKibben has ventured into bizarre or crankish, not mere ordinary, extremism, and has once again overreached ridiculously here with the classic blunder by unknowing extremists following the “global warming” fad of blaming any noteworthy hurricane or tornado on global warming. It’s really surprising he would stoop so low and be so ridiculous, though his recent demonstration against the pipeline was also as bad.

    Doesn’t anyone recall the recent La Nina event which can develop a high pressure zone in the Southwest and a related drought that can sustain itself or make itself worse through the summer?

  8. ThisOldMan says:

    I don’t think Bill was saying climate change “caused” Irene; he’s merely saying it makes storms like Irene happen more often. Which means NYC, along with every place else, is going to get hit more often. By the way, the last hurricane to hit NYC dead on was in 1821.

  9. rudi says:

    LOL RP

    Your site/link deals with paleogeographic subjects, not AGW. Your welcome to take Scotese out of context, and attack Gore as the father of the Internet and AGW, but how does your links home page goal correspond to scientific proof against AGW over a couple of centuries and not millions of years.

    The goal of the PALEOMAP Project is to illustrate the plate tectonic development of the ocean basins and continents, as well as the changing distribution of land and sea during the past 1100 million years.

  10. [...] The Irene Mistake (themoderatevoice.com) Share this:StumbleUponDiggRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. [...]

  11. [...] The Irene Mistake (themoderatevoice.com) [...]

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity