« The American ‘Knesset’ is More Extreme than Israel’s! (Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah, Palestinian Territories)
Pentagon Says Cyber Combat Can Be Considered An Act of War »
When a load of 28,800 rubber bath toys plummeted into the northern Pacific Ocean from a storm-tossed container ship in 1992, beachcombers and oceanographers were in rapture. The toys washed up on coastlines from Alaska to California to Massachusetts for years, some traveling west to east via the Arctic Ocean, a treasure trove for collectors and a terrific opportunity to study ocean currents for scientists.
For Donovan Hahn, a prize-winning editor and poet, it was an opportunity to set out on a series of seagoing adventures long on introspection, as well as laughs, that would culminate in one of the quirkiest but most informative books that I’ve ever read.
In fact, despite its run-on title, the recently published Moby Duck: The True Story of 28,800 Bath Toys Lost at Sea and of the Beachcombers, Oceanographers, Environmentalists, and Fools, Including the Author, Who Went on Search of Them, is an unalloyed joy.
The spill from the Seattle-bound Evergreen Ever Laurel container ship occurred on or about January 10, 1992 at 44.7 degrees N, 178.1 degrees E, south of the Aleutian Island in what oceanographers formally call the North Pacific Subtropical Convergence Zone. It is informally known as the Great North Pacific Garbage Patch because in reality it is a vast floating landfill full of debris, much of it degraded plastic.
Hurricane force winds and waves 36 feet high pitched the Ever Laurel from side to side. During one especially steep roll, two columns of containers stacked six high snapped loose from their lashings and tumbled overboard. One container included boxes of 28,000 plastic animals called Floatees produced in Chinese factories for the bathtubs of America — 7,200 red beavers, 7,200 green frogs, 7,200 blue turtles and (drum roll, please) 7,200 yellow ducks.
Hahn’s quest was initially philosophical (“I wanted to refresh my capacity for awe”) as well as quixotic (“What misanthrope, what damp, drizzly November of a sourpuss, upon beholding a rubber duck afloat, does not feel a Crayola ray of sunshine brightening his gloomy heart?”).
His travels took him to Alaska. Massachusetts, Hawaii, the Arctic, a Hong Kong toy fair and eventually to the mainland Chinese factory where the toys were manufactured, and he never strays far from the themes that Herman Melville riffs on in Moby-Dick, including memory, loss, childhood and fatherhood.
En route, we learn, among many other things, that the 50-mile long drift nets outlawed by international treaty and discarded at sea eventually agglomerate into huge balls, barnacles are especially fond of television screens and computer monitors, and an Alaska governor by the name of Palin vetoed a bill allocating state matching funds to remove debris from an otherwise lovely state park because the debris had washed in from Hawaii and Asia and had not been left there by her constituents.
Not surprisingly, the moral of Moby-Duck is that the lure of cheap plastic in a consumer culture run amok has caused extraordinary harm to our oceans and the creatures that inhabit them. Those cute rubber ducks are arch villains. Toxic at birth and in their afterlife, they become coated with organic pollutants like polyvinyl chloride that photodegrade into smaller pieces that can be fatally ingested by sea creatures.
Love the concept of Moby Duck, thank you, SM.
Can’t wait for Jack Black’s (unless we get KF Panda, III) voice doing Capt. Ahem in the animated film version.
The purpose of recalling this, here on TMV, was probably Palin-bashing, but this plastic-toys story (which has been news for quite some time) is probably worth repeating.
Has anyone grasped one of the much more important issues, raised by this shipping accident, namely how much material of all kinds is transported by boat or ship because water transport is so cheap? (Consider also whenever our military goes overseas — pun intended — on operational projects, what fraction of military assets goes by boat or ship. [Consider if Hussein had been able to seize or destroy the ports of Al-Jubayl or Dammam.])
Now consider “civilian” shipping, how much civilian freight gets moved by water. Also consider, say, China’s plan of expansionism and aggression. Not just the threat of a boycott, refusing to ship freight here (USA) and crippling our economy, if we and China experience hostilities, but the control of shipping in the western Pacific Ocean. (and naval-submarine threats to shipping everywhere — I’ve read one article saying we should sink all Chinese shipping if we and China were in real conflict)
Food for thought
(NOTE: We have inland transport as well as ocean transport, here in the States — think about the barges on the Mississippi and Ohio.)
And think of all the coal it takes (100 cars each day)to feed old coal-fueled electric generating plants.
BTW: China is still on schedule to build 23 nuclear plants versus our one in the U.S.
(Germany is curtailing their nuclear plant building.)
New school curriculum: Chinese mandatory for the kids.
Germany is at the forefront of those wanting more coal-generated power, even if fools there don’t realize it. (More coal trains in our eastern USA and from Powder River Basin to the eastern USA, to ports like Norfolk…) And don’t neglect the alternative, North Sea and Russian gas. Import more (nuclear) electricity from France (pose anti-nuclear at home, but import nuclear power — Look, no nuke plants in our country!). Much new transmission infrastructure would be needed, despite enviro-NIMBY (predictable) opposition.