An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

FBI Agents Witnessed 26 Incidents of Possible Mistreatment

The Washington Post reports that FBI agents witnessed 26 incidents of possible mistreatment at Guantanamo Bay. An example: an interrogator reportedly squatted on a copy of the Koran in an attempt to break the (terror) suspect. Duct tape seems to have been popular as well as an ‘interrogation tool’.

Read more here.



opinions powered by SendLove.to

10 Responses to “FBI Agents Witnessed 26 Incidents of Possible Mistreatment”

  1. Lynx says:

    I obviously am against torture or any of it’s pretty euphemisms (“stess positions” is my personal favourite), but squatting on a book, no matter how important isn’t torture. A symbol is just a symbol. If a terrorist is going to talk because you burn a Koran then I’ll hand you the matches. That’s not to say psycological TORTURE doesn’t exist and shouldn’t be used. Threatening the family of a prisoner, handing them a lock of hair and telling them it belongs to their child is psycological torture, burning a book, no matter how important, is not.

  2. I pointed that out in my post on this, however it should not be done anyway. If not out of respect for other religions, then at least because it will hurt the image of the US tremendously once it comes out. By doing so, you’re not just ‘insulting’ those suspects, but every single Muslim.

    And that’s not something the US can afford.

  3. Paul Silver says:

    I often wonder why we don’t take the opposite approach and treat detainees with extreme kindness and moderate comfort? Have women guards dressed in burkas. Try to appeal to the inner seed of humanity rather than cover it in layers of anger. Imagine treating thousands this way and then releasing back home where their quality of life may even be lower. The Great Satan?

  4. CStanley says:

    I think I get your point, MvdG, and I agree that any kind of desecration to the Koran shouldn’t be done. I guess I have to agree with Lynx too though, that this is sort of a separate issue from torture. I’m more concerned not that this kind of act is torturous to the individual Muslim who witnesses it, but that it is an insult to all Muslims and that is why it is so wrong. In other words, I’m not so much opposed to certain forms of psychological distress being perpetrated on individual detainees (assuming that there is reasonable cause to think that they are enemy combatants or that they have knowledge that is important for the defense of our country). But insulting Islam is a completely separate issue, and any psychological means that are used in interrogation shouldn’t have any relation to that.

  5. I’m more concerned not that this kind of act is torturous to the individual Muslim who witnesses it, but that it is an insult to all Muslims and that is why it is so wrong. In other words, I’m not so much opposed to certain forms of psychological distress being perpetrated on individual detainees (assuming that there is reasonable cause to think that they are enemy combatants or that they have knowledge that is important for the defense of our country). But insulting Islam is a completely separate issue, and any psychological means that are used in interrogation shouldn’t have any relation to that.

    C.S. as happens more often: we are – so it appears – in complete agreement.

  6. SteveK says:

    Paul Silver said: I often wonder why we don’t take the opposite approach and treat detainees with extreme kindness and moderate comfort?

    Well said, Paul. If people could back away from the emotional entanglements of this debate it would seem very hard for them not to see that everyone (you / me; them / us) responds to others in kind.

    Taking this to the next logical step… Treating someone who hates and fears you decently will not be what they expect, it will be a positive step in encouraging them to reevaluate their position. Torture, harassment and humiliation on the other hand will merely fortify their beliefs and be justification to them for their actions.

  7. I believe that this is part of a ‘technique’ used by interrogators for at least several years now (not extremely kind but understanding and not constantly of course).

  8. Kevin H says:

    Paul, I don’t know how well it would work, but I would certainly say we should try it out.

    CS, I think your probably right, but a hypothetical keeps bugging me. What if, in the situation Lynx outlined, the person cares more about the book than the family member? Even if you think its wrong or even constitutes a mental illness, does that change the nature of torture? I’m not sure it does.

  9. CStanley says:

    Kevin,
    I’m not sure I understand you, but I think you’re asking what if some sort of denigration of Islam were the only way to “get to” a prisoner. I guess I find it hard to believe that this would occur, but regardless I don’t think it should be done under those circumstances either (the ends doesn’t always justify the means). Similarly, I don’t condone torturing the person either, it’s just that the Koran/Islam insults are wrong for a different reason IMO.

  10. Sam says:

    Seriously, book abuse is torture? I mean yea, its rude but c’mon. People are being actually, physically tortured and this is what we focus on? The militias in Iraq are taking power drills to their prisoners and we are worried about books? For all I know our boys are doing the same to terrorist suspects. I understand the book represents their religon, but its still just a book.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity