Is American use of Wahhabi terrorists as a foreign policy tool behind the Boston Marathon bombings? For Iraq’s Sotal Iraq, columnist Ahmad Kazem sees the attacks as a fork in the road for the United States, and worries that the American people are so caught up in ‘petty soap operas and mind-numbing television talk shows’, they are easy to convince that they are in danger, and that ‘wars are necessary for their own protection.’
For Sotal Iraq, Ahmad Kazem starts off this way:
Will the Boston bombings be the start of a terrorism transition for America, and an end to America’s support for Wahhabi terrorism and its masterminds in the Gulf? Or will it serve as a pretext to launch a new war, as occurred after September 11, 2001?
In the first instance, it would mean that America has learned from its mistake of supporting terrorism; The second would mean that America is becoming increasingly violent. After the events of 2001 in the era of the Bush presidency, America launched wars directly against Afghanistan and Iraq, bringing great destruction and death to civilians. During the Obama presidency, it has brought less direct destruction and death to civilians by relying on Gulf Wahhabism and its backers. To execute its savagery, America has paved the way for barbarians dressed as Wahhabis, Salafists and members of the Muslim Brotherhood, delegating influence to the idiot Erdogan, the senile Saudi Prince Abdullah, and the prince of the Banana emirate Qatar.
READ ON IN ENGLISH OR ARABIC, OR READ MORE OF THE GLOBAL REACTION TO THE BOSTON BOMBINGS AT WORLDMEETS.US, your most trusted translator and aggregator of foreign news and views about our nation.
Founder and Managing Editor of Worldmeets.US