The Pope and Bush: Brothers in Arms

April 23rd, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN

[NZZ am Sonntag, Switzerland]

Why is it that President Bush and Pope Benedict XVI get along so well? According to this editorial from El Tiempo, Colombia’s largest newspaper:

“Bush sees the world in terms of good and evil, and he considers that only a united front encompassing all 2.2 billion Judeo-Christians will be able to resist Islam. Recent decades have seen increasing religious tension and the spread of theocracies, which now encompass almost all Arab countries.”

In describing Bush’s welcome to the Pope, El Tiempo’s editorial board put it this way,

“The scene of a Protestant-President Bush - being the first to sing Happy 81st Birthday to a Catholic Pope is just as memorable as a Catholic President - Kennedy - got a sensual “Happy Birthday” from by Marilyn Monroe.”

And in explaining the recent behavior of Hillary and Obama toward Catholics and why the Pope ignored “old Catholics of Boston” for “new Hispanic Catholics,” the newspaper says,

“Therein lies the future of Gringo Catholicism. It could also be the future of candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, striving to win back an electorate that always sympathized with the Democratic Party, but which moved toward the Republicans in 2004. These days, both have careful to publicly display their Catholic advisers.”

EDITORIAL

Translated By Douglas Myles Rasmussen

April 21, 2008

Colombia - El Tiempo - Original Article (Spanish)

Benedict XVI and the United States get on well, as demonstrated by the visit of the Holy Father and Bush’s celebration of his birthday.

The most glorious moment for Catholics in the United States occurred in 1961 when, for the only time, a Catholic, Apostolic and Roman politician - John F. Kennedy - was elected president. The most lamentable moment was when, beginning in 2002, it was revealed that some 10,000 cases of pedophilia had been committed by Catholic priests over the course of 30 years. Nearly 3,000 church leaders in the country have been prosecuted for abusing minors and the Church paid $2 billion in compensation. So it was hoped that the first Papal visit since then would refer to the crisis of the “hot sacristies” which left seminaries empty, forced over 800 parishes to close and left 3,238 churches without a full-time priest.

Benedict XVI is showing, during his five-day visit to the United States, that the gentleness of his manner hasn’t reduced the vigor with which he repudiates the pedophilia of his pastors. On at least three occasions he asked for forgiveness, and he met with young people who had suffered sexual abuse. By confronting the situation with strength and frankness, the Holy Father seeks to overcome the shameful attitude of concealment and pusillanimity with which the Church handled the scandal, an attitude that neither John Paul II, nor the Vatican hierarchy, nor the hierarchy of other countries, including Colombia, has not been free of.

His trip seemed less spectacular than those of his predecessor to the same country; but all the same, Benedict’s visit will have better effects on the Catholic community which accounts for 1 in 4 Americans. There were no extraordinary expectations for his trip, except that George Bush exceptionally received him at the airport to show that, beyond honoring the patriarch of a faith or a head of state, he was celebrating a religion. The scene of a Protestant-President Bush - being the first to sing Happy 81st Birthday to a Catholic Pope is just as memorable as a Catholic President - Kennedy - got a sensual “Happy Birthday” from by Marilyn Monroe.

Although it is rumored that Bush might convert to Catholicism, as did former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, it is nothing more than theological gossip . What is true is that Bush sees the world in terms of good and evil, and he considers that only a united front encompassing all 2.2 billion Judeo-Christians will be able to resist Islam, which, with its 1.3 billion adherents, has passed Catholicism as the religion with the greatest number of faithful.

For the time being, the Pope, who presided over full stadiums and spoke before the United Nations, didn’t direct his gaze at the old Irish Catholics of Boston - a city he didn’t even visit.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing foreign press coverage of the Pope’s visit and the U.S. election.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008 at 3:43 pm and is filed under Al Qaeda, Cartoons, Christians, Protestants, Hispanics, Foreign Politics, USA, Neoconservatives, White House, Scandals, Buddhism, Newsweek Blogitics, Pope, Secularists, Islamism, Pope Benedict, Vatican, Newspapers, Judaism, Atheists, Religion, Iraq, Latin America (Central/South), Political Cartoons, Foreign Affairs, Politics, 2008 Elections, Abortion, Democrats, George W. Bush, Evangelicals, Islam, Roman Catholics, Christianity, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Cartoon Commentary, History. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Gallup Daily Tracking: McCain As Flawed Republican Candidate? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.