« Gay Rights: The Religious Who Teach Non-violence, Non-condemnation of GLBT
Poll Shows Clinton-Giuliani Presidential Election Tie And Clinton’s Weakness (UPDATED) »



The Enemy Has Changed But Not The Air Force. It’s Time To Clip Its Wings

November 8th, 2007
By SHAUN MULLEN, TMV Columnist

Print Print

01af_22.jpg
The F-22: A $362 Million Baby (Apiece, That Is)

You know that we live in unusual times when Congress has seen the light and is resisting replacing the U.S.’s mainstay fighter jets with an incredibly expensive Cold War throwback and there are questions about whether the Air Force itself has outlived its usefulness.

The F-15 Eagle is the Air Force’s current all-weather tactical fighter. It entered service in 1974 and is slated to remain in service until 2025. There are some 688 F-15s flying with Air Force and Air National Guard units.

The F-15 is a terrific aircraft but is getting long in the tooth. It has been further strained because of counter-terrorism duty demands, and the entire fleet was grounded last week following a crash in Missouri that raised concerns about possible structural fatigue problems.

Filling in on routine combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan until the F-15 is airborne again is the F-16 Fighting Falcon, another terrific aircraft and the Air Force’s current multi-role fighter. There are 650 F-16s in Air Force service, although some 4,000 are flying worldwide in 23 other air forces, making it the most popular fighter jet. The Air Force’s F-16s also are slated to be phased out in 2025.

Enter the F-22 Raptor, the heir apparent to the F-15 and F-16 and one bad-ass looking aircraft.

The F-22 uses stealth technology to carry out the Cold War mission for which it was designed — attacking advanced enemy fighters. But that mission was redundant before it entered service in 2005 and it is coming on line an era when the enemy is low-tech insurgents.

F-22s are being produced at the rate of about 20 a year with about 100 currently in service. The Air Force originally planned to order 750, but congressional caps as a result of concerns over its suitability for modern-day missions and its cost have limited the number to 277, and the Pentagon now says it will buy a total of only 183. This has had the effect of raising the purchase price to a very dear $362 million per copy.

As Ed Morrissey notes at Captain’s Quarters, “Our entire military strategy relies on air supremacy — and if the F-15 can’t deliver that any more, then we have allowed that strategy to slide into obsolescence.”

Ed is right up to a point, but behind the times.

While air supremacy remains important since China and Iran have air forces (oh, and Putin’s Russia, too), it has taken a back seat to counterinsurgency. The F-22 is not a leap forward but a throwback, and Pentagon claims that recent design modifications to this high-tech behemoth now enable it to fly counterterrorism-support missions are unconvincing and unconfirmed.

This in turn begs the question of where – or even whether – the Air Force fits into a post-9/11 world in which strategic bombing is largely passé, incoming enemy fighters are far and few between, and supporting counterinsurgency missions is Job One.

Please click here to read more at Kiko’s House.



This entry was posted on Thursday, November 8th, 2007 at 4:07 am and is filed under 9/11, Nuclear Weapons, Cold War, War On Terror, Iraq, Military, Afghanistan, Congress. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Gay Rights: The Religious Who Teach Non-violence, Non-condemnation of GLBT
Poll Shows Clinton-Giuliani Presidential Election Tie And Clinton’s Weakness (UPDATED) »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.