(Updated) Erik Prince Defends Blackwater In Face of Critical Report

October 2nd, 2007
By SHAUN MULLEN, TMV Columnist


01eprince.jpg

The publicity-shy chairman of military contractor Blackwater USA told a House committee today that his controversial company is the victim of “negative and baseless allegations” surrounding a bloody melee in Baghdad last month in which his employees killed at least 11 people and wounded dozens more.

Blackwater chairman Erik Prince, in an opening statement to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, declared that he and his employees are victims of a “rush to judgment” about the September 16 shootings in Baghdad’s Nisour Square.

“Blackwater and its people have been the subject of negative and baseless allegations reported as truth,” Prince said, noting that 30 Blackwater employees have lost their lives in Iraq.

The appearance by Prince, a 38-year-old Navy SEAL and messianic right-winger with close ties to the White House and Pentagon, comes on the heels of a blistering new report prepared by the committee’s Democratic majority staff.

It found Blackwater employees have engaged in nearly 200 shootings in Iraq since 2005, in a vast majority of cases firing their weapons first and firing from moving vehicles without stopping to count the dead or assist the wounded. It also found that the State Department has exercised virtually no oversight and in some cases helped cover up incidents.

In at least two cases, including the notorious Christmas Eve 2006 shooting death of a bodyguard for one of Iraq’s two vice presidents, Blackwater paid victims’ family members who complained.

(Meanwhile, CNN reported that the State Department’s initial report on the Nisour Square incident was written by a Blackwater contractor working in the U.S. Embassy security detail.)

Prior to the hearing, the Justice Department asked Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and Prince to not discuss the bloody Nisour Square firefight because of a pending FBI investigation, but this did not stop the California Democrat from reeling off a list of other allegations against Blackwater that he called “troubling.”

“Privatizing is working exceptionally well for Blackwater,” said Waxman. “The question for this hearing is whether outsourcing to Blackwater is a good deal to the American taxpayer, whether it’s a good deal for the military and whether it’s serving our national interest in Iraq.”

Meanwhile, Republican committee members were less inclined to call out Prince.

Representative Patrick McHenry of North Carolina - where Blackwater is headquartered - castigated Democrats for holding what he called “a knee-jerk congressional hearing,” adding, “contracting is the liberal cause du jour.”

“Congress needs to know what went on over there, but there should not be a rush to judgment,” said Representative Dan Burton of Indiana Republican. “There has not been one congressman or one public official that’s been killed while under the protection of these people, and that should account for something.”

Representative Darrell Issa of California took a different tack, trying to shift the focus to defending “General Petraeus and the men and women who do their job,” while throwing in a veiled treat to Waxman that if he went to Iraq Blackwater personnel might fail to protect him.

The committee report adds further evidence to complaints by the Iraq government, some American officials and even Blackwater’s competitors, Triple Canopy and DynCorp, that company guards have taken a trigger-happy approach to their work and have repeatedly acted with reckless disregard for Iraqi life.

The actions have further exacerbated tensions between occupiers and occupied and embarrassed the White House at a time when it has tried to paint an upbeat portrait of conditions in the capital and brought heightened scrutiny on security contractors who operate with impunity and beyond the law.

The report concludes that the State Department has let Blackwater employees run amok:

“There is no evidence in the documents that the committee has reviewed that the State Department sought to restrain Blackwater’s actions, raised concerns about the number of shooting episodes involving Blackwater or the company’s high rate of shooting first, or detained Blackwater contractors for investigation.”

The State Department, which has paid Blackwater over $830 million, would not comment on the report. In addition to the FBI, it is conducting three separate investigations of the shootings.

Blackwater has reported more shootings than the other two companies combined, but it also currently has twice as many employees in Iraq as the other two companies combined.

The company has dismissed 122 of its employees over the past three years, about one-seventh of its total in-country workforce, for misuse of weapons, drug or alcohol abuse, lewd conduct or violent behavior, according to the report.

Prince noted that he considered any loss of innocent life in the Nisour Square incident to be tragic:

“Every life, whether American or Iraqi, is precious . . . [but] based on everything we currently know, the Blackwater team acted appropriately while operating in a very complex war zone.”

In the notorious Christmas Eve incident, an unidentified 26-year-old off-duty Blackwater firearms technician killed a bodyguard for one of the two Iraqi vice presidents and was so drunk after the shooting that another group of guards working for Triple Canopy had to wrest his pistol from him.

Iraqi police detained the man but determined that he was too drunk to be interviewed. Within 36 hours, according to the report, Blackwater fired the man for possessing a firearm while drunk and arranged with the State Department to fly him back to the U.S., angering Iraqi officials who believed the shooting was murder.

Acting U.S. Ambassador Margaret Scobey suggested that Blackwater claim that the shooting was an accident, apologize for it and pay the dead man’s family $250,000 in an effort to keep the Iraqi government from barring Blackwater, according to the report. Blackwater eventually paid the family $15,000.

Committee Democrats kept coming back to the incident with Representative Carolyn B. Maloney of New York telling Prince: “Well, in America, if you committed a crime, you don’t pack them up and ship them out of the country in two days. If you’re really concerned about accountability, which you testified in your testimony, you would have gone in and done a thorough investigation.”

Prince, who remained unflappable throughout the hearing, replied: “Again, he was fired. The Justice Department was investigating. In Baghdad, there is a Justice Department office there. He didn’t have a job with us any more. We, as a private company, cannot detain him. We can fire, we can fine, but we can’t do anything else.”

Meanwhile, the Senate yesterday gave final approval by a 92-3 vote to a defense policy bill that included the establishment of an independent commission to investigate private contractors operating in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill, which must be reconciled with a House version, faces a veto threat by President Bush because it includes an expansion of federal hate-crimes laws.




This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007 at 7:32 am and is filed under State Department, Bush Administration, Military Affairs, Corporations, Iraq. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

Poll: Most Want War Funding Cut And Favor Children’s Health Care Expansion »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.