« 4 Arrested in Possible Assassination Plot Against Obama
Clinton Campaign Sniping Through Media Reports Continues »



Russia Recognizes Independence of Georgian Separatists

August 26th, 2008
By DAMOZEL

Print Print

Well, anyone who has been paying attention knew this was coming.

President Dmitry Medvedev has declared that Russia formally recognises the independence of the breakaway Georgian regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

The move follows a vote in both houses of parliament on Monday, which called on Moscow to recognise the regions.

The move, in defiance of a specific plea from the US president, provoked a wave of protest from Western countries. (BBC News1)

Doubtless the western leaders will be mollified to know that he found this “no easy choice.” (BBC News1)

…or not. Condi found it “regrettable.”(BBC News).  I’m guessing she’ll have a lot more to say quite soon.

Meanwhile, the people of the separatist enclaves took to the streets, celebrating with a few rounds of gunfire.

Residents in Abkhazia took to the streets to celebrate the news, firing into the air, Reuters reports, and in the South Ossetian capital of Tskhinvali there were scenes of jubilation.

“We feel happy. We all have tears in our eyes. We feel pride for our people,” said Aida Gabaz, a 38-year-old lawyer in the Abkhaz capital Sukhumi.(BBC News1)

Meanwhile the Georgians, frightened by the guns, are rapidly leaving. (BBC News1)

Since unifying Georgia was Saakashvili’s raison d’etre, this is only going to stir things up further. Though the Russians have mainly pulled out of Georgia, ” it is maintaining a presence both within the two rebel regions and in buffer zones imposed round their boundaries.” (BBC News1)

Meanwhile, they are still counting up the human cost of Saakashvili’s attack on South Ossetia and Russia’s violent and disproportionate response.

The Russians and South Ossetians don’t plan to let Georgians back into South Ossetia any time soon. (BBC News2)

The people who will suffer most in the long term from this conflict are more than 20,000 ethnic Georgians from a mosaic of villages in South Ossetia who have now mostly fled…

Reporters who have passed through many of the villages in the last few days say they are now in ruins.(BBC News2)

And things don’t look so good for 240,000 ethnic Georgians who were forced out of the other separatist enclave, Abkhazia, in the 1992-3 conflict.

Their hopes of return were predicated on a successful peace agreement which now looks more elusive than ever.

Around 50,000 Georgians live in Abkhazia’s southernmost Gali district under an Abkhaz administration.

So far they have managed to stay in their homes, but their future is also more precarious. (BBC News2)

In the meantime, Russia is doing its best to keep out international peacekeepers or international monitors.

Faced with a tightening Russian grip, Western leaders can only fall back on expressing support for Georgia’s right to these territories.

US President George W Bush made this commitment on 16 August, saying: “Georgia’s borders should command the same respect as every other nation’s. There’s no room for debate on this matter.”

This becomes a moral argument, with the Russians answering that after supporting Kosovo’s unilateral secession from Serbia, the West is guilty of “double standards” in the Caucasus(BBC News2)

The two sides continue to argue over who started it. (BBCNews3). As the article notes, the truth may get lost in the process.

[H]uman rights groups and conflict resolution specialists argue that a full investigation into the circumstances and events of the fighting in South Ossetia are an urgent priority.

In a region where ancient feuds shape current events, half-truths from one conflict all too quickly become the myths that fuel the next cycle of violence (BBCNews3).

The above-referenced article contains a pretty good recap of the events leading up to the conflict. But of course the history of separatism in South Ossetia and Abkhazia goes back much further.

CROSS-POSTED, WITH ADDITIONAL LINKS, AT BUCK NAKED POLITICS



This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 26th, 2008 at 10:27 am and is filed under Cold War, Foreign Policy, Bush Administration, State Department, Georgia (Country of FSU), News Roundup, European Union, EU, Condoleezza Rice, War, Foreign Affairs, George W. Bush, Asia, Foreign Politics, Places, Europe. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 7 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« 4 Arrested in Possible Assassination Plot Against Obama
Clinton Campaign Sniping Through Media Reports Continues »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.