The easy response to calls for more “diversity” is to attack it conceptually. But even defenders of diversification have often struggled to precisely articulate what, precisely, their commitment means. What counts as diversity? Do we want make sure we adequately represent everyone’s favorite color? Why are certain types of diversity seemingly more important to its advocates than others?
I explore these themes and more in Two Models of Diversity. This is an academic interest of mine, and hence this piece is longer and more scholarly in tone (though I try to lighten it up with well-placed basketball analogies). But I think it’s worth a look.