A version of this story appears on Medium
Update 3 July 10pm Pacific: Maryland Deputy Secretary of State Luis Borunda has resigned.
The Trump commission on election “integrity” made headlines last week when it sent letters to all 50 states asking for private voter data. Missed in that flurry: most commission members are not election officials and collectively they do not reflect the country, either geographically or demographically. And some members have zero elections background.
~~~
After winning the Electoral College vote in November, president-elect Donald Trump tweeted that “millions of people” had “voted illegally,” denying him the popular vote win. Shortly after his inauguration, he told us, via Twitter, that he would launch an investigation into voter fraud.
In February, March and April, the president and White House advisors repeated and elaborated upon this claim. Finally, in May the president established an advisory committee on election integrity via executive order.
The executive order provides the mission for the commission:
The Commission shall, consistent with applicable law, study the registration and voting processes used in Federalelections.
At the end of June, the commission asked states for their voter registration rolls, along with non-public personally identifiable data, but nada on state laws, regulations and processes or specifics related to federal elections. Most elections are local or state contests and measures.
Members of the commission
- Chair, vice president Mike Pence, former governor of IN (R)
- Vice-chair, Kansas secretary of state Kris Kobach (R)
- Election Assistance Commissioner Christy McCormick (R)
- Arkansas lobbyist and former state lawmaker David Dunn (D)
- Indiana secretary of state Connie Lawson (R)
- Maine secretary of state Matt Dunlap (D)
Maryland deputy secretary of state Luis Borunda(R)- New Hampshire secretary of state Bill Gardner (D)
- West Virginia Wood County clerk Mark Rhodes (D)
- Former Ohio secretary of state Ken Blackwell (R)
- TBD
- TBD
- TBD
- TBD
- TBD
- TBD
The Baltimore Sun reports that Borunda notified the Hogan Administration Monday that he had resigned from the commission.
There are no state elections directors on the commission. The state elections directors (pdf) for the four states with active officials on the commission follow:
- Indiana: Brad King, Co-Director Indiana Election Division
- Maine: Julie L. Flynn, Deputy Secretary of State
- Maryland: Linda Lamone, Administrator of Elections, State Board of Elections
- New Hampshire: Anthony Stevens, Assistant Secretary of State
Although the US voting system is highly decentralized, there is only one county official on the commission.
The commission is not demographically diverse.
Of the eight states represented on the commission:*
- Seven have white populations that exceed the national average
- Six have black populations that are less than the national average
- All eight have hispanic populations that are less than the national average
- Five have bachelor degree populations less than the national average
- Six have median household incomes less than the national average
- Six have per capita incomes that are less than the national average
- Four have poverty rates that are less than the national average
- Only one state ranks in the top 10 in population; four are in the bottom 16.
McCormick works in DC and is not included here; she is not an elections official for the District of Columbia, Maryland or Virginia. Pence’s home state, Indiana, is represented by the secretary of state. See this chart for population and demographic details on the eight states.
The commission is not geographically diverse.
There is no representative from the American west. Yet a quarter of the U.S. population lives in states demarcated by the Rockies.[1]
Three of the four states represented by Democratic elections officials (AR, ME, NH, WV) rank in the bottom quarter of U.S. states by population; all rank in the bottom third. One of those representatives is from a county, not a state. The county ranks 651st in population.
Some members have questionable bona fides.
Some members of the commission have no elections experience or a record of voter suppression:
- Blackwell (R): while Ohio SOS in 2004, Blackwell tried to reject voter registration forms, prevent absentee voters from voting if they had not received a ballot in the mail, provided inaccurate information about voting status to former felons, and put a speedbump in front of those attempting to vote with provisional ballots.
- Borunda (R): in Maryland, elections are managed through the state board of elections, not the secretary of state’s office.
- Dunn (D): a lobbyist who once served in the Arkansas state legislature, Dunn told the HuffPo that “he did not have any expertise in elections or voting issues.”
- Pence (R): former governor of Indiana; the governor’s office does not oversee elections affairs; the secretary of state does that. And the Indiana secretary of state is on the commission.
- Rhodes (D): represents a small county in a small state.
Kobach is a polarizing figure for a variety of reasons:
- He wrote Arizona’s strict “show me your papers” immigration law, which the state tabled in September 2016.
- In 2011, Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback (R) signed a strict voter ID law which was architected by Kobach. Courts have overruled Kobach’s efforts.
- Kobach has pushed states to demand proof of citizenship, such as a passport or a birth certificate, before allowing people to register to vote. Just before the November 2016 election, five courts overturned these laws in five states?—?KS, NC, ND, TX, WI.
- Last year Kobach defended, in federal district court, the new executive director of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Brian D. Newby, a former colleague of Kobach’s. Newby had unilaterally altered instructions on the federal voting registration form for Alabama, Georgia and Kansas, requiring proof of citizenship before being able to register to vote. The Department of Justice sided with the plaintiffs in the case, an act that led the the judge to remark: “Unprecedented. I’ve never heard of it in all my years as a lawyer.” Kobach told the judge that Newby made the voting-form change upon his request. On September 9, 2016, the D.C. Circuit Court prohibited the EAC from changing the federal voter registration form in a preliminary decision. On June 1, the EAC told the court that they were split along partisan lines over whether the executive director acted within his authority. Therefore the preliminary September 2016 injunction stands.
The commission mission has no mandate to review active voter registrations.
From the executive order (emphasis added)
Sec. 3. Mission. The Commission shall, consistent with applicable law, study the registration and voting processes used in Federal elections. The Commission shall be solely advisory and shall submit a report to the President that identifies the following:
(a) those laws, rules, policies, activities, strategies, and practices that enhance the American people’s confidence in the integrity of the voting processes used in Federal elections;
(b) those laws, rules, policies, activities, strategies, and practices that undermine the American people’s confidence in the integrity of the voting processes used in Federal elections; and
(c ) those vulnerabilities in voting systems and practices used for Federal elections that could lead to improper voter registrations and improper voting, including fraudulent voter registrations and fraudulent voting.
If the goal of the request was to compare voter registrations for duplicates across states: (1) that’s not illegal and (2) members of the Trump family were doxxed for this after Trump asserted that it was illegal.
Moreover, there are two interstate voter registration matching programs, ERIC and Crosscheck. Fifteen states use ERIC, 30 states use Crosscheck, and six states use both programs.
Chasing a non-existent problem
The commission has been criticized for chasing a problem that researchers have shown does not exist: voter fraud.
A study of allegations of voter fraud from 2000 to 2014 found only 31 “credible allegations” of voter impersonation out of 1 billion ballots cast.
Researchers from the Brennan Center for Justice interviewed elections administrators, from 42 jurisdictions, who conducted the 2016 election.
“Improper noncitizen votes accounted for 0.0001% of the 2016 votes [23.5 million] in those jurisdictions.”
In California, New Hampshire, and Virginia—states called out specifically by Trump—“no official … identified an incident of noncitizen voting in 2016.”
Closing thoughts
The flaws are rampant, providing ample ammunition for those who criticize the commission as a witch hunt or an attempt to rollback voter rights. It’s unnecessary (studying a non-existent problem that is touted as a GOP talking point). It’s headed by a man whose efforts are being overturned by the courts, at great expense to taxpayers around the country. It’s stacked against minority voters.
Perhaps the reason the commission is so lopsided is that ethical elections officials are loath to provide a veneer of legitimacy.
The history of voting in the United States is punctuated by voter suppression: preventing people from voting. From our origins — when only landed men were able to vote — to Jim Crow; from refusal (or impediments) to reinstate voting rights of felons who have served their time to modern scaremongering that disenfranchises Hispanic voters.
Many military and overseas citizens are disenfranchised because of logistical problems in transmitting ballots. Although the HAVA requires states to issue provisional ballots, states are not uniform in how they process them (or when they require one).
I’d like to see these voting-related recommendations, which are unlikely to come from this commission as constructed:
- All states move to vote by mail, reducing costs and improving both security (all those computers in the field that have to be stored and transported) and accuracy (assured paper trail) while improving access and eliminating the need for “early voting” polling stations (although there is a need for accessible voting centers).
- Uniform voter registration deadlines, including day-of-voter registration
- Uniform political party declarations for federal offices
- Top-two primary for all partisan races
- Ranked voting
- Tightened requirements on releasing voter registration information
- All states adopt whatever is the most flexible system for military/overseas voters currently in place
~~~
[1] Western states: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY
Header image: Flickr CC
A version of this first appeared at WiredPen
Known for gnawing at complex questions like a terrier with a bone. Digital evangelist, writer, teacher. Transplanted Southerner; teach newbies to ride motorcycles. @kegill (Twitter and Mastodon.social); wiredpen.com