Killadelphia: City of Brotherly Mayhem

November 2nd, 2007 by SHAUN MULLEN, TMV Columnist

01amacmioll.jpg

An All Too Familiar Philly (Murder) Scene

The news from bloody Philadelphia just gets more and more horrifying.

I note that the city’s TV newscasts are cast in the “If It Bleeds It Leads” mold, but the mayhem one day this week was so bad that it soaked up 18 minutes of the 30-minute evening newscast on one station, barely leaving any time for really important stuff like the weather and sports.

The mayhem included incidents in which police Officer Charles Cassidy was shot in the head outside a previously robbed Dunkin’ Donuts by a perp who then stole his service revolver, another incident in which four people were wounded, including another officer, by an ex-con who drowned trying to escape his dragnet, and a lock-down at one of the city’s largest high schools.

Officer Cassidy, a 25-year veteran, has died. He was the fourth Philadelphia police officer shot this year, the third this week, and the second in just 12 hours in a city that is chronically poor, undereducated and violent — and shows no sign of coming to come to grips with its demons.

Mayor John Street led the Greek chorus that chimed in on cue after these latest war-zone convulsions in calling for stronger gun laws in a state where local jurisdictions are at the mercy of an adamantly pro-gun majority in the Legislature.

“Unless we can get control over the proliferation of illegal guns, then the people who are most at risk are, of course, the members of the Police Department,” Street said with practiced angst.

Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson belabored the obvious in saying that his officers are being “basically assassinated” by armed and violent criminals.

“The availability of weapons in our city . . . the availability of guns are really completely out of hand here in the city of Philadelphia,” he said. “Legislators have to realize that we have a gun problem.”

That “problem” has resulted in 325 murders in the first 10 months of the year, the highest big-city homicide rate per capita in the U.S., although the pace recently has slowed slightly from the 2006 rate, which resulted in 406 murders.

Meanwhile, New York City, with five times Philadelphia’s population and once America’s murder mecca, has had “only” 220 murders. Chicago and Los Angeles also lag far behind.

Please click here to read more at Kiko’s House.

This entry was posted on Friday, November 2nd, 2007 at 3:41 am and is filed under Poverty, Bush Administration, Black/African-American, Gun Control, State Politics, Racism, Crime, Domestic Programs. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

10 responses about “Killadelphia: City of Brotherly Mayhem”

  1. domajot said:

    When you juxtapose life in Philadelphia wtih the luxury lives of those making laws and distributing resources, the decline of the US begins to take on a heightened meaning.
    There are reasonble comprimises possible between the two views on gun control, but the reasonable have been pushed out of the picture by those protecting the supply of guns at every step and every level. It has reached a point that even doing research on the subject has been made nearly impossible, because of laws protecticng the gun business all the way through the supply chain.

    The NRA is a major reason why I support public financing for political campaigns..

    Maybe if pictures and crime statistics about Philadelphia were distributed more widely abroad, our esteemed leaders might be shamed into admtitting some of the dirty little secrets about how this country works and doesn’t work.
    “Mr. Ambassador, tell me about Philadelphis’ is a question I would love to hear all around the globe.

  2. PWT said:

    Meanwhile, New York City, with five times Philadelphia’s population and once America’s murder mecca, has had “only” 220 murders. Chicago and Los Angeles also lag far behind.

    I would say then, if NY can do it, so can any large city. Follow New York’s example - broken windows, now who was responsible for that effort…..you’d think there would be more mention of that person’s name but it escapes me at the moment. Perhaps it is an unfair comparison and I’m just being more of a jerk today than usual, perhaps not.

  3. domajot said:

    PWT,
    If you’re really interested in NYC, I can tell you that it’s efforts at gun control have worked fairly well.to recuce crime.
    It’s thwarted, however, in tracing the source of the guns coming into NYC by laws in neighboring and other states, like PA, which limit access to the pertinent infomation.

    Guns are big business with a powerful lobby.
    Philadelphis is but one result. NYC is impacted, as well.

  4. MidAmcn said:

    Itsn’t the real problem here is Black on Black violence. Where the MSM always wants to make a huge deal if there is case of white-on-black violenece or slur. They refuse to discuss the spiral downwards of Black Culture.

    A spiral that was started with the explosion of the welfare state with its father-less children and now accelerating with the gloriification of the Gangsta lifestyle.

    Some simple stats (that you can’t blame on just guns becuase many states that are not heavily black have very permissive gun laws).

    ——
    Nationally, the murder rate for African-Americans is more than three times the average: 19 black murder victims per 100,000 people versus five for the general population.

    In Pennsylvania, the disparity for black homicide is even more pronounced: 30 per 100,000, or six times the national average.

    ————

    The Gangsta Culture is just live and well in Philadelphia just like it was in New Orleans just before the storm hit.

  5. domajot said:

    MidAm-

    No, sorry, you’ll have to find another situation to make this yhe fault of the black race.

    The real story is one of inner city poverty where officials have their hands tied by lawmakers who don’t live there imposing restricions on what they can do to combat both poverty and crime.

  6. Sam said:

    The “Gansta Lifestyle” in these areas is already a feature, it wasn’t promoted by music. The only people that hear the music and try to live it are in the suburbs. Those in the inner city are clued into it well before they hear any music, because its not just a song there, its how it is. And poor people violence has existed long before the “wellfare state”, thats just a total cop out. The ghettos were just as bad when they were populated with italians, germans, irish, et al.. Help for the poorest helps far more than it hurts.

  7. PWT said:

    domajot,

    I live in NYC.

    I’m sure its been said before but, gun laws do very little to prevent criminals from obtaining guns. You know, marijuana is illegal but I can walk a few blocks south to Washington Square Park-or north to Central Park for that matter-and purchase some within a matter of minutes (not that I would, they sell crap down there but you get the point).

  8. DLS said:

    Relevent reading

  9. domajot said:

    PWT,

    It depnds on wha kind of gun laws ans what kind of guns.
    As you know, a legal and licensed gun is permissable in NYC. Those are seldom involved in crime, however.
    Tracking down and elimininating the illegal sources for guns could, of course, never be fool-proog, but If it were possible, the supply could be curtailed.
    Just like the indlux of illegal cigarettes was brought under control

    When other states impede the process by passing laws to protect gun dealers, it’s NYC that pays the price, and people say gun laws don’t work. They sure don’t work if they are sabotaged by other states, that’s for sure.

    T

  10. Bones_708 said:

    Dom doesn’t what happened in NYC show that guns are not the biggest reason for crime? That the crime and murder rate was dropped so greatly without any change in the gun laws shows that. NYC had increasing tougher gun laws and the crime rate would go up.

    Another point

    When other states impede the process by passing laws to protect gun dealers

    Since when do other states need to put the desires on other States ahead of their own? Why would protecting the right of gun ownership (that is #2 on the big 10) be labeled as protecting gun dealers? Every state has their own state constitution with varied stances on many issues, is that a problem? Should following their own state constitution and the desires expressed by the constituents of their state really be considered sabotage?

A Medal For Henry Hyde Hypocrite »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.