Researchers conclude: no relationship between violent video games and violent kids

May 12th, 2008
By JOE WINDISH, Technology Editor


CNet:

Two Harvard researchers have concluded that there’s no data to support the notion that violent video games cause the kids who play them to act out violence in real life, contrary to the vast majority of media outlets that would have the public thinking otherwise. The $1.5 million study, which began in 2004, closely examined 1,200 children after bouts with violent games like Grand Theft Auto and not-so-violent titles like The Sims.

Psychologists Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl Olson found that for most kids, playing these games was nothing more than a stress reliever… Some researchers, including the Harvard psychologists, even suggest that video games have a positive effect on the brain.

Kutner and Olson have written a book, Grand Theft Childhood: The Surprising Truth About Violent Video Games, which they discussed recently on On The Media:

LAWRENCE KUTNER: A year ago, when you had the shootings at Virginia Tech, immediately after that you had the politicians and pundits on the air talking about how this was clearly caused by video games.

Well, if you look at the actual report issued by the State of Virginia that investigated this, when Seung-Hui Cho was nine years old, they say that he didn’t like violent video games. His suitemates, the kids that he shared a dorm room with, said that he didn’t play video games at all, and that really surprised them, because everyone else did.

And that was right in line with our findings, that the boys who don’t play video games at all are left out socially. It’s a marker that there’s some social problems there. […]

In the interviews we did, several of the kids said that they would be angry at a particular classmate or other kid at the school and go into a video game, set up an avatar that looks kind of like that kid, and have a fight with them in the game. And at the end, they said, you know, I felt better. And several of them also said that, you know, now I didn’t feel the pressure to actually fight the kid.

Now, that’s a hint. We don’t know if that’s what’s going on. But most kids, when they play a game, feel better at the end of the session. They’re more relaxed.

If your child is more wound up or more angry at the end of a session, that’s a sign that there may be something wrong, that it’s something you should pay attention to as a parent. That kid’s at greater risk for other issues.

They say kids are really not all that attracted to the sex and violence. “They found it boring,” said Kutner. What kids want are complex characters and very interesting and intricate plots.

We had better hope those researchers know what they’re talking about… ‘Grand Theft Auto IV’ racked up more than $500 million in sales in its 1st week in stores!

As for sex, uh, these “motion-capture” suits are emphatically not for kids!

A REMINDER: You, too, can learn how to design serious games for positive social change at the Games for Change free fifth annual festival in New York City from June 2-4.




This entry was posted on Monday, May 12th, 2008 at 5:57 pm and is filed under Popular Culture, Children, Family, Games, Virginia Tech, Life, Entertainment, Parenting, Computers, Technology, Education. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    It sounds to me like a lot of money was spent to ask some very simplistic questions ..

    Not that these studies arr bad, per se. Every bit of knowledge adds something,
    But the results here are very crude and unsophisticated, as far as I can tell.

    What about age levels, for starters?
    What about about comparing sports with game playing for tension release?
    And so on.

    Years ago, some parents started an outcry against the violence in cartoons and children's books (the wicked witch was pretty wicked, you know). That was pretty ridiculous,.

    This, however is too complacent in its generalizations.
    Parents can't afford to be. They have to consider the nitty grityy questions of balancing time spent on certain activities and the effect on general temperament, long before it reaches the level of violent behavior.

    This should be considered, but it should not be considered as the definitieve answer.

    .

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

Poll: 64 Percent Democrats Want Clinton To Stay In Race »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.