Australian Flavour: Cricket, Wine & World Cup

April 29th, 2007
By SWARAAJ CHAUHAN, International Columnist


_Cricket_picture.jpg

Cricket arouses unbelievable passions around the world, especially during the Cricket World Cup tournament in the former colonies of (what was described as) the British empire - ‘where the sun would never set’.

For cricket lovers Saturday was a special day as the TV beamed the 2007 Cricket World Cup final between Australia and Sri Lanka from Barbados in the West Indies. The World Cup was televised in an estimated 200 countries watched by more than two billion television viewers.

As Australia seems to have made a habit of lifting the World Cup often (as it has done during the last three consecutive finals), my favourite place to watch this major cricketing event is the residence of the Australian High Commissioner (as the Ambassador is addressed in the Commonwealth countries).

At the Australian High Commissioner’s home, situated in the lush green heart of New Delhi’s exclusive diplomatic enclave, a huge screen is placed in the sprawling lawns that beams the cricket match, and watched by about 200 to 300 special invitees.

My wife and I reached our host’s home at 8.30 pm. But owing to the rains at Barbados in the West Indies, the match started almost an hour late. This was a good opportunity for the invitees to enjoy the Australian hospitality…excellent Australian wine and beer, and a lavish spread of Indian, Italian and Chinese cuisine.

In the absence of His Excellency Mr John McCarthy (the informal, amiable and friendly Australian High Commissioner to India), the Deputy High Commissioner David Holly played a perfect host. “The match may finish very late at night but you are more than welcome to stay on and watch it until the end,” Mr Holly told me.

Soon we saw on the TV the opening Australian batsmen playing wonderful cricket against the Sri Lankan team, and scoring at a rapid pace. In about two hours time it was becoming clear that Australia would be the winner.

And as the atmosphere at the New Delhi host’s party became more festive, the imbibing of the heady liquid servings, and partaking of the gourmet dishes, rose in equal proportion.

The World Cup has grown as a media event with each tournament. The World Cup venue (from 13 March to 28 April 2007) this year was awarded to the West Indies via the International Cricket Council’s (ICC) rotational policy.

The United States contingent lobbied strongly for matches to be staged at its newly built cricket ground in Lauderhill, Florida, but the ICC decided to award all matches to Caribbean nations for this year’s World Cup.

The 16 competing teams were initially divided into four groups, with the two best-performing teams from each group moving on to a “Super 8″ format. From this, Australia, New Zealand, Sri Lanka and South Africa won through to semi-finals, with Australia defeating Sri Lanka in the final, giving Australia its third consecutive World Cup victory (and fourth in all the World Cup matches that started in 1975).

A basic form of cricket can be traced back to the 13th century, but it may have existed even earlier than that. The game seems to have originated among children of the farming and metalworking communities in the Weald between Kent and Sussex in England.

It originated in its modern form in England and is popular mainly in the present and former members of the Commonwealth. In the countries of South Asia, including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, cricket is the most popular sport.

It is also a major sport in places such as England and Wales, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Bermuda, and the English-speaking countries of the Caribbean, which are collectively known in cricketing parlance as the West Indies. The Indian Cricket Team is currently the highest paid national sports team in the world (in terms of sponsorship).

Though the first match in India was recorded in 1721, when a group of sailors gathered to play in Western India, India’s national cricket didn’t play their first Test match until 25 June 1932 at Lord’s (in England), becoming the sixth Test playing team.

The Indian team has continued to be highly ranked since then in both Test cricket and One-Day Internationals. The team won the Cricket World Cup in 1983 and was runners-up in 2003.




This entry was posted on Sunday, April 29th, 2007 at 3:27 am and is filed under Popular Culture, Britain, United Kingdom, India, Asia, Australia, Africa. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

Should Prostitution Be Legalized? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.