Puerto Rico Must Declare Independence to Restore Spanish to its Rightful Place

January 3rd, 2008
By WILLIAM KERN


Time for Puerto Rican Independence? ...
Is the over-dependence on the use of English hampering Puerto Rico economically and socially? According to this op-ed article from Argentina’s Argenpress, Puerto Rico must have its national sovereignty, not only to correct cultural and historical wrongs committed by the ‘United States Empire,’ but to revert to Spanish simply to do business with the growing number of other countries that embrace Spanish over English.

“Those who wish to remain isolated from the rest of the world, either by extending Puerto Rico’s current colonial status or through annexing it as a U.S. state, care little about the fate of the Spanish language, because their worldview has shrunk.”

By José R. Bas García

Translated By Halszka Czarnocka

December 28, 2007

Argentina - Argen Press - Original Article (Spanish)

In Puerto Rico, there remains a constant debate about language that has its roots in the inconclusive political status of the island. There are the same divisions on the issue of status as there are on the defense of Spanish or English. Those who favor independence [for Puerto Rico] see Spanish as an integral part and a unifying factor of the Puerto Rican nationality. Those statesman [those in favor of U.S. statehood] have adopted a seemingly pragmatic position, downplaying the importance of the cohesive value of Spanish and extolling the teaching and use of English as an instrument for achieving better economic conditions. “English is a universal language of business,” they insist. Many, following the false notion that if their children don’t learn English they won’t be able to succeed in life, make great sacrifices to keep them in exclusive and prohibitively expensive private schools, where the teaching is done in English.

But the myth of English seems to be waning. According to a news article [ - in Spanish] published on a Web site devoted to the Spanish language, Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo has ordered the teaching of Spanish restored to her nation’s public schools. Information has been circulated unofficially that suggests the teaching of Spanish in Philippine schools will begin in January 2008.

“The language of Cervantes will return to where it should never have left, despite its ban by the Americans during the first 40 years of the twentieth century,” states the article.

Like Cuba and Puerto Rico, the Philippines were a colony of the Spanish Empire until 1898, when it became, along with the two Caribbean islands, the possession of the United States . The Spanish language has been banned in the Philippines ever since. But the use of Spanish among Filipinos became a form of resistance to the American presence. The ban on Spanish by the American authorities, and then after independence in 1946 through the actions of two of its presidents to remove Spanish from the public sphere, had the effect of dramatically reducing its use.

But despite the attempt to erase Spanish from the Filipino mind, a total eradication of the language has never been achieved. The truth is that, “the perception of the world, the sensibility and rationality in relating to one’s surroundings, and the management of time and space for Filipinos are anchored in two worlds: Asian on the one hand and Western rationality in its peculiarly Spanish form - on the other. This mentality has never been linked to the Anglo-Saxon view of the world,” argues the article, in describing conditions similar to those in Puerto Rico. It adds that anyone who aspires to practice the profession of historian in the Philippines is obliged to be thoroughly familiar with Spanish, since over 80 percent of its historical documents are written in that language.

Beyond the historical and anthropological, there are other reasons for wanting to repair the consequences of the linguistic accident of the Philippines initiated by the United States Empire. The Philippines are not alone in reintroducing the study of Spanish. Brazil, which is a global economic power, made the teaching of Spanish compulsory in its schools in 2005. This raised the global potential of those able to communicate in Spanish to about 700 million people. Brazil was probably motivated for reasons similar to the Philippines: to better understand its trading partners. The Philippines aspires to be part of the Community of Latin American Countries [CIN], which is made up of countries that speak Spanish and Portuguese.

“The chances that the Philippines could become a member of CIN is small … as long as the link with the Spanish language remains broken. That limitation has created obstacles for the Philippines for opening up and gaining access to the market potential of almost 600 million people in over 20 countries on three continents,” points out the article.

READ THE REST ON WORLDMEETS.US

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 3rd, 2008 at 1:12 pm and is filed under Multiculturalism, Latinos, North America, Hispanics, Americas - N & S, Latin America (Central/South). Both comments and pings are currently closed.


Sabato’s Crystal Ball: Two Articles Today »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.