What the “Other Hispanics” Say About Our Elections

July 2nd, 2008 by DORIAN DE WIND

In his “ Gallup: Hispanic Voters Overwhelmingly Support Obama,” Joe Gandelman points to a new Gallup Poll that shows very strong support among Hispanic voters for Barack Obama.

The poll itself:

Hispanic registered voters’ support for Barack Obama for president remained consistent and strong in June, with Obama leading John McCain by 59% to 29% among this group.

And, Gandelman adds (from the Gallup piece):

Gallup has interviewed more than 4,000 Hispanic registered voters during this time period. An analysis of candidate support by subgroup within the U.S. Hispanic electorate reveals that many of the well-established divisions in this year’s campaign — such as the gender gap and the marriage gap — are weak or nonexistent among Hispanic voters.

Rather, Hispanics of differing demographic backgrounds all tend to solidly support Obama. It thus appears that there isn’t much beyond a shared Hispanic ethnicity or identity that explains Hispanic voting patterns.

Being part Hispanic-Latino myself, I am naturally interested in the political leanings and aspirations of Hispanics in America. By “Hispanics in America” I mean persons of Spanish (the country, Spain), Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin residing in the United States. And, since we are talking about elections and voting, I should hastily add to my “Hispanics in America” definition: “and who are registered voters.“

All this is very interesting, but equally interesting, I believe, is what the Hispanics and/or Latinos who are citizens/residents of Spain, Central or Latin American, etc., feel about our elections and about the candidates.

But, unless one is ready to do a myriad of personal interviews–and spend a fortune on travel, or telephone calls, which I guess is doable–one has to pretty much rely on what the “Hispanic” media reports on the matter.

An excellent source for such information is the site “Watching America,“ watchingamerica.com. For example in the last couple of weeks, there have been several translated articles from Spain, Mexico and other Latin American countries discussing the subject:

In “The Enormous Fight for the Latino Vote,” in El Diario Exterior, Spain, June 23, we read:

One of the biggest challenges that awaits Democratic candidate Barack Obama is winning the Hispanic vote, because, during the primary elections, he was not very good with Latinos and he will not make it to the White House without their massive support. It will not be easy. Though Latinos have historically voted for the Democrats and they did in even greater numbers during the recent primary elections of the party (in part due to increasing anti-immigration rhetoric from the Republicans), a large fraction of the Latino vote was for Hillary Clinton.

In “Europe’s Obama Distraction” in ABC, Spain, on the same date, one might be somewhat surprised to read:

If Europeans could vote for the next U.S. President today, we would elect Barack Obama, with a noticeable majority over his Republican rival, John McCain. At least that is what some recently published surveys assert. What is even more noteworthy is that the Democratic candidate also exacts a victory among the right-wing European electorate. Surprises will never cease.

But then the author quickly dampens such prospects, and even manages to deliver a slap in the face of the American voter by concluding:

However, it is in foreign policy that the European electorate needs to know with whom it is dealing. John McCain has spent many years forging alliances with European personalities, while the Democratic candidate is absolutely new at foreign policy matters and is only interested in the domestic agenda. When he speaks about international conflicts, the slips of Barack Obama are memorable, but they are beyond the grasp of an electorate that, largely, would not be able to locate Spain on a map.

Finally, a more recent, June 29, article, “Obama and McCain Go After the Hispanic Vote,” in El Universal, Mexico, reports on the convention of the Education Fund of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO), which both McCain and Obama attended and where they made speeches. The following excerpt summarizes what both the Convention and “El Universal” focused on:

Immigration is the theme that captures the audience’s attention. The Democrat accused his Republican rival of turning his back on immigration reform under pressure from his party. McCain promised that a change in the immigration laws was, is, and will be his priority.

I will post some more excerpts in future columns, but focusing more on what the Hispanic people, rather than the Hispanic press, have to say about our elections and our candidates.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008 at 1:15 pm and is filed under Latinos, Hispanics, Newspapers, Voting, Newsweek Blogitics, Spain, John McCain, Immigration, Polls, Latin America (Central/South), Barack Obama, 2008 Elections. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Were ‘Brainwashing’ Techniques Used on US Servicemen in Korea Part of the Training at Guantanamo? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.